|
If Bush would have bothered to send ANYONE in a focused manner against Al Qaeda -- rather than doing the wacky new trifecta in Iraq of "Steal their Oil. Eliminate Israel's Enemies. Bring on Armageddon!" -- the threat of Al Qaeda would be eliminated by now.
Trouble is, while Bush is superb at political assassination and playing well in Peoria, at least among the wackos in Peoria, he stinks at everything else.
If he would attack Osama bin Laden with the sane intense unrelentless ruthlessness and focus as he did John Kerry, who is, um, an American, a long-standing Senator, etc -- this ballgame would have been long over.
As for "Do they really want Bush?" I am not convinced. If he had been HONEST about his agenda, and spoken about what he really has in mind, and not just suggested stuff in code words, I would agree that 51% of American voters (not the same thing as Americans as a whole) back him. Some of us have seen through this guy from the start. Many more have caught on. Many many many more oppose the bastard, but got their brains hijacked by single issues like abortion and gay rights, and voted for him because of the "he's a Christian, in spite of all he does!" meme. I think all but the wackos are going to feel betrayed in a little while....
Kerry fought as an intelligent, articulate statesman -- ooops, too bad that is not the approach that is predictably successful against fascism on the march! Now we seem to be hearing from Dem leadership that "I believe we have peace in our time." BULLSHIT BULLSHIT!! Am I disappointed? By golly yes. Does this miscalculation lessen my support of him? Yes. Cracky -- the stakes COULDN'T have been higher -- and once again, the Democrats didn't quite face up to the grotesque power of their foe.
But here's the irony: John Kerry would have been extremely effective against Al Qaeda. Bush is totally fucking clueless about global terrorism. He sees it as a big opportunity for entrepreneurs! He thinks Al Qaeda can be fought with the tactics of the Cold War (thanks, Condi!). It would have been unpleasant to clean up Bush's imperial fuckup in Iraq, and for that, he should feel lucky he lost.
Um, we have long needed brutal fighters on our side. Um, like guys who want to see democracy in America survive? But I guess our leadership either doesn't care as much as we do, or have their heads up their asses so far or are so incestuous in their gentleman clubs that they are totally fucking clueless as to what is going on.
Bush steals ANOTHER election, leads us FURTHER into disaster, and our leaders call for unity and reconciliation. I really would have preferred a "Boris Yeltsin taking a stand with the people in front of tanks against the military coup attempt" moment, than mewing about unity. I will NEVER shake hands with a war criminal. Doesn't ANYONE in the Democrats get it? They sure don't act like it. The Republicans "get it" -- they are seizing power brazenly right and left. Bye bye democracy, hello one-party fascist state. The Dems think they DESERVE power just because they are "right." The extremist republicans just seize it, and can;t believe how easy we make it for them and don;t give a fuck how they "look"....
When good people DO NOTHING -- well, deja fucking vu.... Well, in our case, good people did SOMETHING, but not enough. We need to be fighting these people like the Nazis they are! but still, mew mew mew mew. I am NOT advocating extremism. I am NOT an extremist. I just want sanity and the Constitution back! THEY are the extremists.
Here we go again -- the Banality of Evil. Friendly Fascism. It does NOT bode well. Bush at least was kinda sorta honest when he talked about a "generational challenge" -- too bad people didn't understand this was code for "world war".
My prediction : look for 15 years, at least, of instability and misery, here, and abroad. And that is the best case scenario. Wait til China decides to go WalMart on us. And anyone still wondering why Pootie Poot is spending money on new advanced nuclear weapons? Does anyone SERIOUSLY think he is planning to use them in Chechnya and that he is not planning for the medium long term? He's playing chess too. And Bush? He just knows high stakes poker, bluffing with an empty hand, and putting up other people's money.
Kerry? He would have been an effective president. Too bad he didn't go to war with the extremists who hijacked our country, and called things by their right names. Given how he understood Nam so profoundly, I thought he might be the Man for the Time, seeing we're now in another stupid unwinnable war. He should have been more honest about what I HOPE he knows we are up against. IF he doesn't get it, then fuck him.
My remaining hopes are with "sane Republicans." But now even they are getting the Swift Boat Vet treatment. I THOUGHT sane Republicans would fight the extremists who hijacked their party and core values, but they are knuckling under to the fascists as well.
Bad times are just beginning, friends. Resist in every way you can.
|