henslee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-19-04 10:13 AM
Original message |
With votes myster. poppin up in FLA, shouldn't Castor who lost by 1.1% |
|
somehow demand a recount? I mean another DUer just posted that 1.1% triggers an automatic recount. We all know those votes are there.
|
MrUnderhill
(650 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-19-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
1. The "other poster" was incorrect. |
|
1.1% does not trigger a recount. It's tens of thousands of votes above the recount threshold.
|
henslee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-19-04 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
MrUnderhill
(650 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-19-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I don't think that's necessary... |
|
It's still a discussion worth having - whether Castor should demand a recount on the basis of identified fraud?
|
Kralizec
(982 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-19-04 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
3. This inaction woul again add to circumstatial evidence that something is h |
|
appening behind the scenes. The thing is, the Dems and Kerry are a little too quiet. This can mean two things. Our country has crossed the line to a new era of gov't. If you think the last 4 were bad just wait. The lack of press and fight from Dems could be just that they are under hard control now and that the Dems are a dispowered party, left only to give the show of a fair system. OR They could all be acting funny because they know something we don't. Otherwise he SHOULD be at least sniffing around...
|
NewYorkerfromMass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-19-04 10:19 AM
Response to Original message |
5. .5% was the threshold in 2000 |
|
but it could certainly get closer upon recounts.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 11:25 PM
Response to Original message |