Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some reasons I'm convinced that * LOST

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 07:50 PM
Original message
Some reasons I'm convinced that * LOST
1. Every "irregularity" (or ninety nine point nine percent of them) benefit *. This is a statistical impossibility.
2. The much discussed discrepancies between exit polling and results have never been explained. Exit polls have a historical record of accuracy.
3. There are documented instances of voter suppression in minority/poor areas.
4. Voting machines are owned by openly partisan repukes who not only contribute to *'s campaign, but, in one case, state that they will ensure a * win.
5. The political party screaming that we "have no proof" is the same party that fights mandatory paper trails. Who, in good faith, could be against paper trails and auditing of elections?
6. THE PARTY THAT ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY BENEFITS FROM THESE IRREGULARITIES IS COMPRISED OF KNOWN LIARS AND CHEATS!!!!

To those of you who will close your eyes to all of this, and put your faith in the * administration and its cronies to tell us the truth, I say.... You deserve what you get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Welcome to MY world
I've been here since Nov. 7, 2000. I became a permanent resident on Dec. 12, 2000.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. November 7, 2000?
Wow, I wish I'd known about DU then. I was hopelessly glued to CNN at that time, trying to figure out why a chimp was being allowed to steal the election. I didn't get much help figuring out from CNN; they were too busy helping him steal it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. LOL, I was referring to alternate reality world
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 09:46 PM by Mabus
where the rules were finally thrown out the window and the GOP proved they could lie bald-faced to the American public and the American public would take it.

I guess I refused that day's ration of soma. I found DU shortly afterwards thanks to listserves I was on at the time. People kept linking to DU posts. DU saved my sanity in the aftermath of the 2000 selection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IAMREALITY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Besides all of those, Here's another
The one that Started it for me. That there is no way a President who has so many documented failures in his 4 years in office, with almost nothing to campaign on that was Positive of his performance, Won an election with 9 million more votes then he had previously, despite monumental efforts from the opposing party.

Also, Don't forget the bigger percentage than approval rating standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Good points!
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynx444 Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. never crossed my mind!
i can't believe i had not thought of that before. i didn't realize that dubya got nearly 9 million more votes then in 2000. right there is enough proof for me that there must be massive fraud. i mean come on. he's done NOTHING good for this nation, he's ran us into the ground, and now he's gonna be the president again?

i don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Plus... the DEBATES!
Sorry -- after that first one, mumbling nonsense, no clear answers for anything, compared to Kerry who answered perfectly: COME ON!!!

Maybe I'm an insane idealist, but I just don't see more than half of Americans voting for him after that. No way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IAMREALITY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Oh Yeahhhhh, and
Also the fact that the fraud dumbass bastard has to even be wired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. Of course it did help *
that the media came out after the debates saying that chimp won, even when their own internet polling told them the opposite. The power of owning a lapdog media really can not be exaggerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skylarmae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. but what about the rest of us? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I know!
We suffer too!x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneEyrez Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm with YOU 100%
That's why I've been trying to kick my posting at:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1371524

I want people to BE THE MEDIA and keep all their friends/family knowledgeable about what the media WON'T tell them. I feel that this is going to be common knowledge EVENTUALLY, but I don't want that to be several years down the road when it's too late to undo the damage the little bastard will do in his second term. He's done enough. He's failed in every enterprise he's ever undertaken, including this one. He needs to go home!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Why do even some in our own party say that it's time to
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 08:17 PM by senseandsensibility
move on? Sure, we have to fight for the future, but we can't investigate this until Dec. 13? :shrug: A Demcoratic activist that my husband works closely with today told him it was time to move on.
He's very concerned about his wife, who is taking the loss badly. I feel that some of this denial is based on fear and emotion, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kick!!!
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 07:58 PM by autorank
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I have always believed that the supporters of "It" in this country
are in the minority, even people I know who are "conservative republican" types think that "It" is a terrible president and he is not a true conservative. His supporters are extremists and there is NO WAY they came up with 8 million or whatever extra of them to vote in the last "election". No way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. no way in hell
nothing i've seen, read, or heard over the last 4 years will ever convince me that * "won" this election. with republican defections + a very motivated base of democrats + 2000 nader voters + muslims and arabs + whonever else bush pissed off...no way. no way all those people are less in number than those mythical evangelicals...no way in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Tell Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm sure he knows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whalerider55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. perhaps he listens...
but does not hear.

perhaps he sees but does not understand.

perhaps he knows but does not act.

whalerider55
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thier deception tactics are based on thier inner wars
The rationize war,spying and deception and call it intelligence gathering,they hate our form of intellect where we ask questions instead of thinking we have found fundamental truth to pat ourselves on the back.They have changed words to dupe people,rewritten history to cover thier trails.If we can feel good about anything now and it's hard,we can see that they are thier enemy and any time this rises up it falls.What they have that is different now is the media which isn't the media but a big ad for thier ignorant belief that they are royalty and the world owes them a living. PERSEVERE thier shit doesn't work and they are so lost that they think thier shit doesn't stink.It does stink and it isn't just half this country that smells it,it is most of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimpanzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. POPYCOCK!
Those honest republican 'patriots' would never do anything to undermine the US Constitution or the bill of rights. That is simply blasphemy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. hee hee
Have the repukes ever lied to us before? (yes). Well, have they lied to us RECENTLY? (yes, many times). Well, have they lied to us about election fraud? (absolutely). I rest my case!:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimpanzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. OK - so I exaggerated a bit...
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well said, and here's some documentation for all of the above
VOTE FRAUD Links - a DU Compendium
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=201&topic_id=1984#

VOTE FRAUD Links Compendium - Thread #2
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=201x3223

Updated at least daily, usually twice a day. There's some amazing stuff in there, just amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Thanks for the reminder!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-i-acs Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. One more reason: They don't want it recounted.
If the Repukes were sure they won legitimately, they wouldn't oppose a complete accounting of all votes.

Those crowing about a 'Mandate' shut up tight when I say "Then you shouldn't have any problem with a 100% recount of all votes in all states ..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. Frankly, if you follow Occam's Razor, fraud IS the simplest explanation
So, I for all the reasons he/she states, I agree w/ the
original poster. It's the only thing that ties it all together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drunkdriver-in-chief Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
25. You left out the best reason
Americans would never return to office a man who lied them into a war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. But unfortunatly, 59 million people have.
or am I dead wrong? The truth has to be revealed in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ever_green Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
30. Stolen. There is no question about it.
I don't think we should "face it, we lost" as I hear many people, mostly republicans, suggest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Why should we face something
that didn't happen? We "faced it" in 2000, and look where that got us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latteromden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
32. I am absolutely convinced that Bush lost...
There's one other thing that I just can't get out of my head that tells me that Kerry won and Bush lost.

I was at the Minnesota Kerry HQ on Election Night, and I went to check CNN's website (before they stopped letting us look at the results because we had to keep working) to see if they'd updated their electoral college map at all yet, and they had West Virginia (which was a swing state at one time), Illinois, most of the other southern states called, but not Mississippi. Mississippi was tagged "Too close to call," just like Ohio. It confused me beyond belief. They'd called the rest of the states based on exit polls- was Kerry really doing so well nationwide that Mississippi couldn't be called until the results came in?

I just can't get over it. That was the first thing I thought of the next morning, and it made me incredibly uneasy. They could have messed up with reporting the exit polls, or something, but it didn't sit right with me that MISSISSIPPI would be considered "too close to call" and yet Kerry lost the election. You really can't make Mississippi competitive as a Democrat and LOSE. I don't understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Interesting.
Was it close in Mississippi? I have to confess I didn't pay much attention to that state, assuming it was *'s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latteromden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Not close, but that just made it weirder
It ended up 60-40B, as everyone expected, but the fact that it was just such a sure solid state for him made it all the more strange that it would be considered close for any reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Hi latteromden!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. But so very different from so many other states...
...where the results weren't at all like what was expected.

Good to see that you agree that the expectations going in (as measured by polls) should be used as a barometer against the actual results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueTarheel Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. I thought the same thing
when I saw North Carolina was too close to call at one point- I was proud my home state could possibly go blue (of course with Edwards being from there, too). A little later it was called for * :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. Hi BlueTarheel!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
38. Not to mention that four-, five-, even eight-hour-long
Edited on Sun Nov-21-04 01:10 PM by grace0418
lines at the polls only translated into about 11 million more total votes. That's approximately 22 more votes per polling place, if the figures I found were correct. How do 22 additional people over the course of an entire day translate into the kinds of lines we saw on the news on Nov. 2? Even taking GOP election "watcher" harassment into account, that still seems fishy to me. In several precincts in Chicago, they ran out of ballots because response was so great. It seems to me that if you believe the numbers being reported, you have to believe that millions of people waited in line for hours but then decided not to vote once they got there. It makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
39. Don't go gittin' all logical on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC