Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Article from Oakland Tribune about the Berkley presser

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
YellowDoginthehouse Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:16 PM
Original message
Article from Oakland Tribune about the Berkley presser
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess that makes Republicans the "ghost" party
Ghost votes, scary candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowDoginthehouse Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shelley806 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks; interesting article, but I'm confused. I thought the problems
in Florida were the optical scanners. Does anyone have a link to the original report? Not just the news article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. original study
I agree -- the work done here at DU indicated the Florida optical scan counties had some of the biggest variances from expected tallies.

So, these UC results were puzzling in light of those results.


Paraphrase of UC Berkeley findings on presidential vote:
The more "blue" a Florida county was in 2000 presidential tallies, the more unexpected "red" votes were observed in 2004, in those Florida counties utilizing electronic voting.

http://ucdata.berkeley.edu/
University of California - Berkeley
UC Data - Data Archive & Technical Assistance
first entry under VOTING

Working Paper:

The Effect of Electronic Voting Machines on
Change in Support for Bush
in the 2004 Florida Elections

by Michael Hout, Laura Mangels, Jennifer Carlson, and Rachel Best

With the assistance of the UC Berkeley Quantitative Methods Research Team
Last revision: 11/18/2004


Summary:

- Irregularities associated with electronic voting machines may have awarded 130,000 excess votes or more to President George W. Bush in Florida.

- Compared to counties with paper ballots, counties with electronic voting machines were significantly more likely to show increases in support for President Bush between 2000 and 2004. This effect cannot be explained by differences between counties in income, number of voters, change in voter turnout, or size of Hispanic/Latino population.

- In Broward County alone, President Bush appears to have received approximately 72,000 excess votes.

- We can be 99.9% sure that these effects are not attributable to chance.

Details:

Because many factors impact voting results, statistical tools are necessary to see the effect of touch-screen voting. Multiple-regression analysis is a statistical technique widely used in the social and physical sciences to distinguish the individual effects of many variables.

This multiple-regression analysis takes account of the following variables by county:
- number of voters
- median income
- Hispanic population
- change in voter turnout between 2000 and 2004
- support for President Bush in 2000 election
- support for Dole in 1996 election

When one controls for these factors, the association between electronic voting and increased support for President Bush is impossible to overlook. The data show with 99.0% certainty that a county’s use of electronic voting is associated with a disproportionate increase in votes for President Bush.

The data used in this study come from CNN.com, the 2000 US Census, the Florida Department of State, and the Verified Voting Foundation - all publicly available sources. This study was carried out by a group of doctoral students in the UC Berkeley sociology department in collaboration with Professor Michael Hout, a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the UC Berkeley Survey Research Center.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From the paper, pg. 4: "Essentially, net of other effects, electronic voting had the greatest positive effect in percent voting for Bush from 2000 to 2004 in democratic counties."

The most numerically important of the Florida counties with discrepancies under this model, Hout said, would be: Broward, Palm Beach, and Miami-Dade.

From the press conference on Nov. 18, 2004, paraphasing:

Simply put, the more "blue" a Florida county was in 2000 presidential tallies, the more unexpected "red" votes were observed in 2004 in those Florida counties utilizing electronic voting.

~~~~~~~~~~~

PS Here's another story on it.

Researchers: Florida Vote Fishy

by Kim Zetter
Wired.com
12:18 PM Nov. 18, 2004 PT
<http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,65757,00.html>



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC