NYT article on ACT's efforts in Ohio

[bones_7672]

"Who Lost Ohio?"

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/21/magazine/21OHIO.html?oref=login&pagewanted=1&oref=login

[Eric J in MN]

1. Interesting quote in article.

''For the life of me, I can't see how we could lose Ohio,'' (Steve) Rosenthal had told me over lunch in Washington the previous week. ''The only way they win Ohio is to steal it like they did Florida four years ago.''

------

Now check out this list:

http://fairnessbybeckerman.blogspot.com/2004/11/first-hand-reports-by-other-ohio.html

1. Too few polling machines, particularly for rush-hour voting, poorer areas/large numbers of people. (3 to 4 hours at the very least, some waited up to 8 and 9 hours)

2. Numerous calls reported, "There are not enough machines. We need more people."

3. Machines were breaking down. One polling location had only two machines for very large group. (9 calls)

4. There were many reports throughout the day of non-functioning machines. Many people were getting frantic. Others were leaving. Many were demanding that paper ballots be sent. This Election Protection project lawyer and the others at her calling center tried to call ES&S to tell them that machines were malfunctioning. The Board of Elections said the machines had calibration problems and someone would come out. The Board of Elections was inundated with calls about the machines malfunctioning.

5. There were numerous reports of voters trying to select Kerry and Bush was selected on the screen instead. The voters would try repeatedly to get Kerry to come up. Voters were only allowed three "pushes." They were told they could request a different machine, but of course by the time they were on the phone with the Election Protection project workers, it must have been too late.

6. There were also reports of voters getting to the review screen and seeing "No Selection." For president. This was often at the same polling places where machines were breaking down. Voters could not get their vote for Kerry for president to register.

7. Numerous reports of "Presidential choice not selected." Ballot would not register "Kerry".

8. There were also reports of many Republican challengers at polling locations and no Democratic challengers. This Election Protection project lawyer had at least one voter who was told by a Republican challenger that she was not on the list at her polling place. When she called the Board of Elections office they told her that she was indeed a registered voter in the proper precinct. An Election Protection project person had to make calls to ensure that the voter could vote. How many other voters allowed themselves to be turned away by the GOP challengers?

9. Another GOP challenger asked a voter for a Green Card in order to get a provisional ballot. The voter called in to find out what a Green Card is. Of course, this was a trick. Voters must be citizens.

10. Machines at some polls had to be re-set after every voter. This took so long that people started to leave. This Election Protection project lawyer and her colleagues sent food out to the voters. They sent food out to voters at different precincts at least three times during the day to encourage them to stay in line.

11. Issue 1 "Defense of Marriage" was holding up line. Voters did not understand what the issue, Defense of Marriage, meant. (LOL, you gotta laugh at this one)

12. One Election Protection project lawyer bought 6 lamps and extension cords after numerous reports came in of a polling place that was so dark both inside and out that voters could not see to vote. It was gray and dark and raining for much of the day in northern Ohio. People were waiting in line for multiple hours in the rain.

13. Many people in one poor, black, polling location had their water turned off, if their bill was un-paid, coincidentally, on the morning of the election. The Water Department/utility told voters to stay home to wait until the matter was resolved, because the voters needed to let someone into their unit. The Zell Milleresque Democratic mayor of Youngstown endorsed George W. Bush. The Water Department/utility company did not come. This Election Protection project worker and colleagues went to the peoples' homes so some of the voters could vote.

14. Voters cars were being ticketed. Voters felt their cars were properly parked. This was reported in both Mahoning County and Trumbull County.

15. No provisional ballot was offered to a man who filled in/requested an absentee ballot, but did not receive the absentee ballot. When he arrived, he could not get a provisional ballot.

Note: Reports are now coming out that many people in Ohio who requested absentee ballots did not receive them. Some of these voters who did not receive their absentee ballot were given a provisional ballot when they went to the polling place, others were not, still others had to have Election Protection project people fight to get them their provisional ballots. How many walked away disenfranchised?

---------------------

Please send the list above to reporters and pundits, using the email addresses at:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x816939

[shraby]

2. I get a "page not found"

[Eric J in MN]

3. Thanks, try again (nt)

nt

[bones_7672]

4. try again, it works. n/t

[jmknapp]

5. The article is sloppy in its facts

The article says that Kerry barely won Franklin County. BS! Unofficial totals in the county show Kerry with 275,577 votes out of 513,429 cast. That's 8%! And that total includes the excess 3,893 votes given to Bush in Gahanna 1B. Correcting for that Glitch(tm), Kerry had 275,577 out of 509,536, or 54% to Bush's 45%. That's a 9-point win baby.
Kerry's winning margin of 45,278 votes compares to a Gore 2000 margin of 4,156 votes. The ACT, MoveOn et al GOTV and registration efforts were phenomenal in the county.

Franklin County's voter rolls were expanded 25% since 2000, with 167,225 newly-registered voters. Looking at the precincts where these newly-registered voters lived, they were at least 60-40 Kerry, and probably more as the 527 efforts concentrated on likely Kerry voters.

The overall margin of victory was impressive in Franklin County, but unfortunately was throttled over what it might have been but for the machinations of the Board of Elections. They headed off ACT and MoveOn at the pass (the polling booths) by shortchanging Democratic precincts on the number of voting machines. Thus the urban vote (where the 527s were concentrating) was held to a level that the rural counties could overcome.

see: http://www.copperas.com/machinery