Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Columbus Ohio official -- pleased as punch with election - PHOTO!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 11:27 AM
Original message
Columbus Ohio official -- pleased as punch with election - PHOTO!
PS Franklin County is Columbus, where MANY things went wrong.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gawd - that guy must weigh 300 pounds - has he been EATING the ballots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Elections officials should be nonpartisan.
Why haven't the powers that be thought of this before?! Oy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truman01 Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree with you but. . . .
Who is really NON-partisan? How can you not have an opionion? I guess you could run without a party affilitation but that is a matter of symantics isn't it? Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, but
there are many people that don't even pay attention to politics. They may belong to one party or another, but they may not.

But it seems as though these jobs are stepping stones to state office, and that should be curbed. Maybe if we promoted long term civil service employees to a rotating seat?

I dunno. It's an obvious conflict of interest though. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phlesh Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. This is the guy that was in charge of the machines...
and he held back 2000 machines while dealing more out to the repub areas and less to the demo and minority areas... this guy is a damn criminal...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truman01 Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I agree it is a conflict of interest n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. They have obviously been willing to put in very partisan election staff
and by both parties. One problem is how do you get a non-partisan human? The current system is good for the powers that be in a lot of different places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. RICO
Is there a possibility of class action suits under federal RICO statutes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gosh Darn Those Glitches!
From CNN.com, Nov. 5

Glitch gave Bush extra votes in Ohio
Friday, November 5, 2004 Posted: 4:15 PM EST (2115 GMT)


COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) --

An error with an electronic voting system gave President Bush 3,893 extra votes in suburban Columbus, elections officials said.

FRANKLIN COUNTY'S unofficial results had Bush receiving 4,258 votes to Democrat John Kerry's 260 votes in a precinct in Gahanna. Records show only 638 voters cast ballots in that precinct.

Bush actually received 365 votes in the precinct, Matthew Damschroder, director of the Franklin County Board of Elections, told The Columbus Dispatch.

State and county election officials did not immediately respond to requests by The Associated Press for more details about the voting system and its vendor, and whether the error, if repeated elsewhere in Ohio, could have affected the outcome.

Bush won the state by more than 136,000 votes, according to unofficial results, and Kerry conceded the election on Wednesday after acknowledging that 155,000 provisional ballots yet to be counted in Ohio would not change the result. (Full Ohio results)

The Secretary of State's Office said Friday it could not revise Bush's total until the county reported the error. ...

In the Ohio precinct in question, the votes are recorded onto a cartridge. On one of the three machines at that precinct, a malfunction occurred in the recording process, Damschroder said. He could not explain how the malfunction occurred.

Damschroder said people who had seen poll results on the election board's Web site called to point out the discrepancy. The error would have been discovered when the official count for the election is performed later this month, he said.

The reader also recorded zero votes in a county commissioner race on the machine.

Workers checked the cartridge against memory banks in the voting machine and each showed that 115 people voted for Bush on that machine. With the other machines, the total for Bush in the precinct added up to 365 votes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Woah Baby! Damn are these Republicans hot, or what?
Personally I will cast my vote for the "or what" option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC