Statistical Analysis of Election tampering in Ohio. *Important*

[slay]

Richard Phillips did an excellent analysis of election tampering that occurred in Ohio. Here is a link to the original thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1380992&mesg_id=1386320&page=

[DrCorday]

1. The lines were so long...

Is there a comparison out there of average wait times for voters in historically democratic precincts versus republican precincts? I've heard rumor, but I'd like to see numbers. I think there's a red flag in that arena too.

[Carolab]

2. It appears he submitted this to the courts

Do you know whether he did or not?

[slay]

3. Not sure, but here is a link to his website..

Richard Hayes Phillips has a some similar posts relating to the election tampering in Ohio on his website:
http://web.northnet.org/minstrel/cleveland.htm
and
http://web.northnet.org/minstrel/ohio.htm
and
http://web.northnet.org/minstrel/columbus.htm

[Liberty Belle]

4. Stopping ceretification of Ohio's vote

Did you read the part where he asks that the Ohio Secretary of State be prohibited from certifying the election results? Can someone find out where this testimony was given and if any action was taken? Was this part of the Cobb suit tossed out yesterday, or something else?

[bones_7672]

5. You really don't get it, do you?!?

No state of federal official is going to do ANYTHING with a statistical analysis of unofficial results. NOTHING, ZIP, NADA. All these posts about THIS egghead, THAT egghead, and their white papers is a big freaking waste of time and energy!!!

Without solid evidence of ACTUAL vote tampering there will be NO ACTION to stop the certification of the Ohio election on 12/3. And the way it looks now, there will be no recount completed before the electors are chosen on 12/13.

But, hey, if it makes you feel better, keep fighting the egghead battle. But is won't matter a bit in the long run.