Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

106% voter turnout in Wyoming

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:30 PM
Original message
106% voter turnout in Wyoming
This is one way to jack up the popular vote.

Somebody put this on their blog, and I didn't believe it until I looked it up.

You can see for yourself on the Wyoming Secretary of State's web page at the bottom of the right hand chart titled GENERAL ELECTIONS.

If for some reason the number at the bottom isn't 106%, I saved a copy at about 10:52 am 11/27/2004, attached below.

A Wyoming paper explained this by saying same day registration accounted for the disparity, which as the blogger who posted this noted, would mean if turn out was as high as it was in Ohio and Florida, 36% of voters would have registered election day. That's a lot of procrastinators to get off their dead ass at the last minute.

The numbers faked aren't gigantic in the grand scheme of things, but it does go the pattern we saw in Florida in 2000, and in Florida, Ohio, and elsewhere this year of doing anything to win, including manipulating the numbers.


http://soswy.state.wy.us/election/profile.htm


FROM THE ORIGINAL BLOG:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00000987.htm

Eagle-eyed commentor Tracy updates us with a Nov 6th item from Wyoming's Casper Star-Tribune offering this "explanation":

"This was an exciting election day in Wyoming, with many people registering at the polls," Secretary of State Joe Meyer said Wednesday.
...
"It is possible to have a voter turnout of more than 100 percent because Wyoming statutes allow voters to register at the polls on election day," he said.
...
"Having Wyoming's Dick Cheney on the ballot has probably driven our high voter turnout the last two presidential elections," Meyer said.


So that explains that. For the record, Ohio, which doesn't have same day registration, but was the most contested state in the union this year had a registered voter-turnout of 69.86%.

Presuming interest was as high in Wyoming -- the reddest of the red states, where Bush won handily -- as it was in Ohio, that would mean that some 36% of the total electorate registered on Election Day in Wyoming.

As I said...keep moving...nothing to see here...these aren't the droids you're looking for...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I bet if you asked that 36% they wouldn't be able to remember (or prove)
that they registered to vote that day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't this the same state that Cheney bragged about...
delivering to the * Campaign 2 days after the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cavanaghjam Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. All it would take for such results
in a state so sparsely populated would be for Cheney to vote twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't suppose there are public records
of who registered on election day? Aren't voting records and rolls public? Can't anyone look at the "one week before the election" rolls vs the "election day" rolls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Wyoming population
I visited there once, and it's so thinly populated it makes Alaska look like New York.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You would think...

they would have a record of exactly who registered to vote on Nov 2... Aren't they obligated by law to keep such a thing? Couldn't this be a part of the FOIA filed by Bev?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Can Anybody say Ukraine???
:think: This and the other 'abnormalities' of our presidential election is what our republican administration is using to say that the Ukrainian election does not meet international standards of a fair and valid election. WHAT HYPOCRITES!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC