Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arkansas Code: Act 858 -- UNCONSTITUTIONAL! (A Win vs. Censorship)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Entertainment Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 08:55 AM
Original message
Arkansas Code: Act 858 -- UNCONSTITUTIONAL! (A Win vs. Censorship)
Edited on Fri Nov-19-04 08:58 AM by khephra
Press Release



The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund welcomes the November 16 ruling of U.S. District Judge G. Thomas Eisele of the federal court in Little Rock, Arkansas who ruled that Act 858, amending the Arkansas Code, is unconstitutional. The amendment criminalized the display of books which are inappropriate to younger minors but constitutionally protected as to older minors and adults.

The challenge to the law, resulting from its amendment in 2003, was brought by a broad-based coalition of plaintiffs including That
Bookstore In Blytheville, along with trade associations representing bookstores, librarians, book publishers, comic book publishers and retailers and distributors in Arkansas, as well as the ACLU of Arkansas.

The CBLDF and co-plaintiffs believed that the law unconstitutionally required retailers and libraries to prevent all minors from accessing constitutionally protected materials that may be considered inappropriate for younger minors. By requiring plaintiffs physically to segregate such material, the statute unconstitutionally restricted adults and minors from browsing materials protected by the First Amendment.

Judge Eisele had directed certified questions as to the meaning of the amended statute to the Arkansas Supreme Court. Based on the response from the Supreme Court, the judge found the display provisions "facially unconstitutional under the First and
Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution because such provisions are overbroad and impose unconstitutional prior restraint on the availability and display of constitutionally protected, non-obscene materials to both adults and older minors."


CBLDF Director Charles Brownstein says, "This is a victory for readers and retailers in Arkansas whose First Amendment rights have been preserved by this well-considered decision."

Plaintiffs in the suit include That Bookstore In Blytheville, American Booksellers Foundation For Free Expression, Arkansas
Library Association, Association of American Publishers, Comic Book Legal Defense Fund, Freedom to Read Foundation, International Periodical Distributors Association and the ACLU of Arkansas.

Michael A. Bamberger, a New York-based partner with Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, was lead counsel for the plaintiffs and was assisted by John L. Burnett of Lavey & Burnett, Little Rock, Arkansas.

For more on this decision by the Arkansas court, click here. For Newsarama's original coverage of Act 858, click here

http://newsarama.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=21769
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks Khephra, for posting this. Keepin' an Arkansawyer
informed.

Good news. : )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernlad Donating Member (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for posting (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Entertainment Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC