Taverner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 12:53 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Atheists should be called... |
|
Edited on Fri Apr-18-08 12:55 PM by Taverner
|
TZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message |
1. atheists. Although I kind of like freethinker .. |
|
Some people may not realize what freethinker means. Good diplomatic answer in some awkward situations when you don't want to argue religion. I HATE HATE HATE the term brights though..Its very..arrogant.
|
Taverner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yeah thats my thought too |
|
I like Freethinker because its everything Bright Claims to be, but is not.
Dawkins is right saying we shouldn't define ourselves in opposition to something. That's why I like Freethinker - its not arrogant (like Bright) but it is a positive, rather than a negative (Atheist)
|
Rambis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. Which god is it you don't believe in? |
|
The protestant or the catholic? Question asked by a woman in Belfast of an English visiting author-
|
billyskank
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Well you know there's good ones and there's bad ones. |
Fox Mulder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
4. How about calling the atheist by his/her name instead of... |
|
labels based on their non-religion.
:shrug:
|
billyskank
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Goodness no, we can't do that. |
|
Edited on Fri Apr-18-08 01:02 PM by billyskank
Religious people must be known by their religious delusion and atheists must be known by their godlessness otherwise we wouldn't know who to hate.
|
Taverner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Are you against pronouns too? |
billyskank
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. No I'm just against stupid fucking bullshit like this. |
Taverner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. As an Atheist/Freethinker/Bright I like to know how to identify myself |
|
If we eliminated labels altogether, communication would be impossible.
Think about it - if you couldn't label anybody you'd be unable to describe anything. Try describing the firemen who ate hot dogs with the nurses at the police barbeque without labels. It means nothing.
As you can see I have had a problem with this "labels are tyranny" shit since the 90's when it infected college campuses.
|
Taverner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Because if I were to list the name of every Freethinker in the world when describing a group |
|
It would take all fucking day.
Thats why you use pronouns and such. You say "the men over there" or "the people over there" or "the freethinkers at Rational Response"
Capice?
|
Tommy_Carcetti
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Nah, I better not. n/t |
|
Edited on Fri Apr-18-08 01:08 PM by PeterU
|
Schema Thing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Other: Often, and by beautiful, bright women |
regularguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Pesonally, I'm just not religious. |
|
The term Atheist is ok, I guess. I really hate the term "Brights". I know they claim that it wasn't meant to be as obnoxious as it sounds, but humility would prevent me from calling myself a "Bright".
|
Orsino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Atheists. The other terms paint with overly broad brushes. |
|
Atheists are as capable of being rigid thinkers as anyone else, I imagine.
|
KamaAina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
15. ...on Saturday night, because... |
|
...they don't have anyplace to go in the morning. :evilgrin:
|
Aristus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
16. the "a-" in atheist, meaning not or non-, should not be read as having negative |
|
connotations.
Another "positive negative" is the "Non-" in Non-Commissioned Officer. This military designation is one of pride and honor, suffering no negative qualities simply because of the implied abscence in the use of "Non-".
I don't think of atheist as a negative term, and I'm a Christian.
|
Anon18
(2 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
From the dictionary...
the·ism Pronunciation Key – noun 1. the belief in one God as the creator and ruler of the universe, without rejection of revelation (distinguished from deism). 2. belief in the existence of a god or gods (as opposed to atheism).
So being an Atheist is NOT negative, it's just the opposite of someone who has the belief system of a Theist.
None of us will know for sure who is right till we've passed on! How delightful!
|
ScreamingMeemie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Is one really a "free thinker" if they have to label themselves something?? |
|
I tend to believe not so much. I am neither atheist nor a believer of any religion. I just am.
|
StopTheMorans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message |
HeresyLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-18-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message |
Kitty Herder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 12:33 AM
Response to Original message |
20. Whatever they want to call themselves. Or by no label, if they don't want one. nt |
moggie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-21-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message |
kwassa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message |
22. Many freethinkers are not atheists |
|
so that idea is out. Many rational people are not atheists, either.
|
trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-23-08 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
26. So let me get this straight. |
|
You not only personally get to decide who is a Christian™, but now you have the audacity to tell atheists what they can or cannot call themselves?
Bold, kwassa. And oh-so-tolerant.
|
TechBear_Seattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message |
23. ... Whatever they call themselves |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-22-08 08:38 AM by TechBear_Seattle
If a man calls himself an atheist, call him an atheist. If he calls himself a Bright, call him a Bright. If he prefers to be called a non-believer, then he is a non-believer.
With regards to myself, call me anything but Late For Dinner. :hi:
Edited for spelling.
|
frogmarch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-22-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:10 AM
Response to Original message |