Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Outcry as clergy say calling God 'He' or 'Lord' encourages wife-beating?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
heidler1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 04:52 PM
Original message
Outcry as clergy say calling God 'He' or 'Lord' encourages wife-beating?
Church of England leaders warned that calling God 'He' encourages men to beat their wives.

They told churchgoers they must think twice before they refer to God as 'He' or 'Lord' because of the dangers that it will lead to domestic abuse.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-408190/Outcry-clergy-say-calling-God-He-Lord-encourages-wife-beating.html

I agree.

Opinions Please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. It can lead to people internalizing the idea that males have divine authority over females. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. EXACTLY. That's why man made God in HIS image and not hers.
So she would be clear on who da boss were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. When I was a teen my mother made me go through 'confirmation'
whatever that is. The only memory I have of it, other than it's intrusion on my Saturday afternoons, was when the preacher told us that God had no gender. I asked why we always refer to God as the father & 'he.' I asked why we couldn't come up with a special pronoun to refer to God since God has no gender. The other kids laughed & then so did the preacher. :eyes: I thought it was a valid question then & still think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. It was, and it is, a valid question. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I would not ascribe a cause-and-effect relationship
This is a bit leap of logic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. God has a penis?
What for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heidler1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Mary might know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't know whether it encourages wife beating.
But She might prefer something other than "He." ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think men who beat their wives use that as an excuse.
They want power over someone. It's that simple. They have a deep need to control someone else, whether it's their wife, girlfriend, or child, and they will use whatever means to explain away that need that they can.

Men have used many and myriad excuses to hang onto their social power for eons, from religious to scientific to social crap. There's no reason to assume that this is anything different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good for them
I don't know about beating... that seems to be a few steps farther along that road. But insisting on portraying God as male certainly underlines the idea that women are secondary humans. I'm all in favor of gender-neutral language in church! I think it's one of those situations where our language *shapes* our understanding - even if it's on a sub-conscious level.

God is all genders, and none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Religion/Church is sexist..
They have that "A women should be see and not heard' motto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. 1 Timothy 2:11-15
2:11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
2:15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.

More:
http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/1tim/2.html




http://www.morethings.com/fan/carrie-sissy_spacek/piper+laurie-martyr_mom05.jpg

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. "He," maybe, but "Lord?" Is "Lord" now a sexist term? How else should you translate Adonai?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Gauger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. That's one of the stupidest fucking things I've ever heard.
Who the fuck are these people? You know what I think would encourage men to beat their wives? Saying, "Beat your wife." Anything less than that and you have a rather heavy burden of proof in terms of showing causality.

Additionally, doesn't their opinion as to whether or not god is indeed male have any bearing on the matter? Of course, the very fact that they are in church shows that they have little if any regard for fact to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Remember the story is in the biased, RW Daily Mail
The report itself, primarily how the church and clergy should respond to domestic abuse, points out

we have chosen to adopt the more wide-ranging term
‘domestic abuse’ which views violence in a broader context of
behaviour over time


and gives, among examples, as well as 'physical' and 'sexual':

Psychological
For example, shouting; swearing; frightening; blaming; ignoring or humiliating
someone; blackmailing them; threatening harm to children or pets if they
misbehave; ridiculing every aspect of their appearance and skills; keeping them
deliberately short of sleep; being obsessively and irrationally jealous; keeping
them isolated from friends and family; threatening suicide or self-harm.

Financial
For example, the illegal or unauthorized use of someone’s property, money,
pension book or other valuables; forcing them to take out loans; keeping them
in poverty; demanding to know every penny they spend; refusing to let them
use transport or have money to pay for it.

Spiritual
For example, telling someone that God hates them; refusing to let them worship
(e.g. not allowing a partner to go to church); using faith as a weapon to control
and terrorize them for the abuser’s personal pleasure or gain; using religious
teaching to justify abuse (e.g. ‘submit to your husband’), or to compel
forgiveness.


So it seems reasonable to say that the language and attitudes in a religion could possibly be a cause of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Gauger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I'm the last person you need to convince that religion can be harmful.
I am always astounded that people are offended at the claim that ideas can be dangerous. Nationalism, for instance, is a terribly dangerous idea. And I certainly understand that ideas can lead to or facilitate abuse. But the gender of a a deity that does not even exist is not something that I would reasonable expect to engender abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hendo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Thats just insane n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. And women who walk around without burqas encourage rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC