Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2008 Election Results According to Religious Devotion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:13 PM
Original message
2008 Election Results According to Religious Devotion
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=38850

Although Barack Obama won a majority of the national popular vote and the Electoral College in yesterday’s presidential election, he did not win a majority of the voters who say they regularly attend church, according to the network exit poll.

Obama’s failure to win among church-going Americans continues a pattern that was also seen in the 2000 and 2004 elections, when Republican George Bush won the presidency.

On Tuesday, Obama defeated McCain in the nationwide popular vote, 52% to 46%.

Among voters who told the exit poll that they attend church once a week, however, McCain defeated Obama, 55% to 43%. McCain also defeated Obama 55% to 43% among voters who said they attended church more than once a week.

Obama ran strongest among voters who told the exit poll they “never” attend church. These voters picked the Democratic candidate over the Republican, 67% to 30%. Among those who said they attend church “a few times a year,” Obama won 59% to 40%; and among those who said they attend church monthly, Obama won 53% to 46%.

Eleven percent of voters told the exit poll they have no religion. These voters supported Obama, 75% to 23%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well yeah! Churchgoing leads to some pretty stupid decisions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, churchgoing STARTS with a pretty stupid decision
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is true...
and it only gets wackier from there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Karlson Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That was uncalled for
And you know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I can cite examples if you are so inclined...
It's not like this was some out of the blue thought or shot from the hip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Karlson Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Examples?
Do these examples indicate that decisions are badly affected all through the religious spectre as a result of attending church? Are they fit to induction and/ or deduction?

Because if not, you were generalising, Sir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. "religious spectre"
is that the same as Holy Ghost?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Karlson Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. No Sir,
Th the religious spectre is the wide variety of religious denominations available to present-day societies.

Just like the colour spectre is the wide range of colours available to present-day eyes.

The discussion I'm trying to have here, is on scientific evidence of your thesis that attending church would affect good judgement. My personal beliefs stand aside of this discussion (my belief in the Holy Spirit included), because the burden of evidence, scientifically, rests with the proponent of the thesis. That would be you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Almost
specter

1. a visible incorporeal spirit, esp. one of a terrifying nature; ghost; phantom; apparition.
2. some object or source of terror or dread: the specter of disease or famine.

Also, especially British, spectre.

spectrum

l. Physics The distribution of a characteristic of a physical system or phenomenon, especially:
The distribution of energy emitted by a radiant source, as by an incandescent body, arranged in order of wavelengths.
The distribution of atomic or subatomic particles in a system, as in a magnetically resolved molecular beam, arranged in order of masses.
A range of values of a quantity or set of related quantities.
A broad sequence or range of related qualities, ideas, or activities: the whole spectrum of 20th-century thought.

2. A graphic or photographic representation of such a distribution.

3.a) A range of values of a quantity or set of related quantities.
3.b) A broad sequence or range of related qualities, ideas, or activities: the whole spectrum of 20th-century thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Karlson Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I see you have caught me on a point of spelling
I admit that I am not a native speaker, and as such make mistakes.

Standing corrected,

B.K.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yeah, I was just joking around with you.
I didn't realize where you were from.

Speaking only one language, I didn't mean to get picky with someone who probably knows four.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Karlson Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. If I may brag for a moment...
*seven*

OK, the bragging is over.

Seriously though, feel free to correct me. It only improves my mastering of a foreign language. Your correction was very instructive and I thank you for it.

Betty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Seven is VERY impressive!
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaplainM Donating Member (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. It reflects a decision to abandon reason in favor of superstition. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Karlson Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I dare you to prove that all religion equals superstition
(without spelling errors, this time)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-25-09 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. I dunno.
su·per·sti·tion (sōō'pər-stĭsh'ən)
n.

1. An irrational belief that an object, action, or circumstance not logically related to a course of events influences its outcome.
2.
1. A belief, practice, or rite irrationally maintained by ignorance of the laws of nature or by faith in magic or chance.
2. A fearful or abject state of mind resulting from such ignorance or irrationality.
3. Idolatry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-25-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Well, for one thing the stats definitely prove that all
that devotion and praying doesn't work. Or another way to put it, the religious have the wrong interpretation of God's will.

Either way you slice it, it doesn't look good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-25-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. If you think reason and faith are incompatible....
....then you're just as ignorant as those you condemn.

They aren't incompatible, they were never meant to be treated as such.

To say they are, to make that blanket statement, proves you to be an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-25-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Asshole, party of one, your table's ready.
"Churchgoing leads to some pretty stupid decisions"

Really?

Wow, you truly are a jackass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. For Obama to have won as many votes as he did, this must mean
Church goers are in the Minority????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Ya - The Immoral Minority
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Religion makes you stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Or maybe being Republican makes folk more likely to lie about their church attendance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-25-09 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. I'd like to see the church/age/politics breakdown
Old people go to church. Old people are Republicans. Therefore, does going to church make you a republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC