Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does threat of excommunication by church for use of contraception in Catholic countries cause

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:38 PM
Original message
Does threat of excommunication by church for use of contraception in Catholic countries cause
Edited on Fri Sep-25-09 07:41 PM by clear eye
major suffering? Is the lack of affordable contraception and its use in places like Mexico a result of enforced opposition by the Catholic church? Is this threat a cause of economic hardship on the family level and does it result in the inability of the economies of Catholic countries to create jobs in proportion to the workforce? Other faiths oppose contraception but as far as I know Catholicism is the only one that threatens the follower w/ not being allowed to worship alongside the rest of the community.

How do Catholic and other fellow religious DUers see this issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. my mother was threatened with excommunication
She kicked out a drunken abusive husband. She had no choice, he was abusing the first child and she was pregnant with the second. She couldn't go to church or receive the sacrament until she was on her deathbed, when a local priest took pity on her. It was horrible for a devout catholic.

Things may have changed here since then, but the threat is very real. AND very painful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Is using birth control grounds for excommunication? I know that abortion is,
but I thought BC was just a big sin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. No. It is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenniferj Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Cherie Blair has been open about taking BC and
she is well known as a famous Catholic... She is not ex-communicated though some tradionalists may suggest that she should be...
If you look at Catholic families in the UK or the USA most of them are now small families of two or three children...Not like it used to be with huge families...It seems the fundermentlists are less likely to use BC than most practicing Western Catholics... Many practicing Catholic uses BC and see it as private matter....Plently of priests seem to operate on a don't ask, don't tell policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Used to be when I was catholic. Never heard it was changed
Funny thing is that the guy who developed the birth control pill was Catolic. He thought he had done Catholics worldwide a great favor by developing a method where they could have unprotected sex and not reproduce.
He was crushed when I believe it was Pope Paul condemned the artificial birth control and excommunicated the developer - can't remember his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why would the church want to take away someone's
cellphone privelages and what do cell phones have to do with contraception?? Oh I remember, it's the phone sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. I spent three years in a Catholic Institute in Mexico
First grade through third grade elementary.

I learned that devils can dress like a penguins (nuns).

You want to talk about major suffering? There it is.

I did not lose my faith in God, but I definitely lost my faith in the Church.

I will be forever grateful for those three painful years that opened my eyes to the difference between faith and Church.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've never heard of anyone threatened with excommunication
for using contraceptives. Most Catholics "agree to disagree" with the Pope about this. Surveys show that Catholic couples use family planning to the same degree as non-Catholic couples in the US and Western Europe. Affordable contraception is more widely available to poor women in large cities in Mexico than it is in large cities here in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Interesting.
Especially about the availability of contraception in Mexico. I don't think public opinion is so relaxed about this issue in many majority Catholic countries. Are you including Ireland and Italy in that survey? Is the treatment of contraception (a sin but no excommunication) the same everywhere in the Catholic world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Vatican affirms bishop's excommunication of Call to Action...
Edited on Fri Sep-25-09 08:24 PM by clear eye
http://www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=22281

LINCOLN, Neb. (CNS) – The Vatican has upheld Bishop Fabian W. Bruskewitz's decision 10 years ago that membership in Call to Action 'is totally incompatible with the Catholic faith' and results in automatic excommunication....

"Call to Action, founded after the U.S. bishops' national Call to Action conference in Detroit in 1976, works to change church teachings in such areas as mandatory celibacy for priests, the male-only priesthood, the selection process for bishops and popes, and opposition to artificial contraception."

And that's in the RC minority U.S., though it's not clear in the article which aspect of CtA's work was the cause of the ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. The RCC will never get serious about this. They fudge their membership numbers as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm old. I was told no contraception by a priest in the early sixties, I walked
out and never looked back.

No man was tellin' this woman how to live.

(rant off)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jemelanson Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. The underlying principal is whether or not the "Church" has the
Edited on Sat Sep-26-09 01:14 PM by jemelanson
right to control women.
"In most primitive societies it was unthinkable that male sexual desires should take precedence over the needs of mothers and their children. Patriarchy everywhere sought to change this, through religious sanction. Women were to serve men's sexual urges even when preoccupied with motherhood. This was the meaning of God's announcement to Eve: 'I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception, in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be subject to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee' (Genesis 3:16). In this context, "sorrrow" meant labor pangs, as well as the harried life of a mother with children too close together, and the illnesses and injuries caused by spreading a mother's care too thin.
The Judeo-Christian culture insisted on men's control of women's bodies. Wives were not to imitate sexual relations, but they were never to deny their husbands. The Catholic church laid down the law that no wife could accuse her husband of rape even if he forced her with accompanying brutality. Sexual "release" was his conjugal right ( but not hers).
The church interpreted the fable of Genesis as God's mandate to compel women to bear as many children as possible, even at the cost of the children's or the mother's health and welfare. Men refused to deal with the problem of over-production and women were forbidden to do so, by the church's tradition. In pagan times, women used some fairly effective birth-control devices, ranging from vaginal sponges to abortifacient drugs. Many churchmen believed the witches inherited secret knowledge of such things, which contributed to the vigor or witch- and midwife-persecutions." this was taken from the book by Barbara G. Walker "The Woman's Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets"
pages 13-104. Along with this Birth-control was considered as nothing else than mutual masturbation. The church did not view sex as masturbation when it was for a husband's benefit as long as it was not mutually satisfying. In the 17th century the church said that the only purpose of marital sex must be conception and that if the woman receives too much pleasure she cannot conceive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC