Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An exercise in critical thinking.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:23 AM
Original message
Poll question: An exercise in critical thinking.
Which does more damage to society?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. The blend of both is especially toxic.
I voted 'capitalism.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And when they are blended, which is using which?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Good question. It's a tree house pact, done out of sight of decent folks,
that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Does it matter?
Both are a means of controlling society economically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Of course it does.
Historically ruling classes use religion, along with racism, nationalism and the rest, to divide people and maintain control. The ends and motives for this are patent. What is the overriding motive for religion to control society? It's much simpler to just go for the power without the overlay of a theology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. But, to the average person
getting fucked by the system, does the distinction between "religions control capitalism" and "capitalism controls religion" really matter? They're getting fucked no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. It's important to know which system is doing the fucking.
If your job vanishes, I doubt you want to discuss the evils of religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. But, if your religion is being used to quash your opportunity to find employment
You should definitely discuss it. Are most people that self-aware?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I can't think of a single economic crisis that traces its root cause to religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Our current crisis can be traced back to the "moral majority"
The MM had a large impact on getting Republicans elected who started the deregulation of financial markets. The moral majority was a religious-based movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. No, I think this one is bigger than Jerry Fallwell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. And abetted by the Democratic party
Which makes it even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. I voted for religion
Simply because we can mitigate some of the damage of capitalism through legislation. Legislating religion in the U.S. is nigh on impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. That's assuming capitalism does not control the legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Ideally, voters should be smart enough to vote
for a legislator that is not controlled by capitalism. Unfortunately, that doesn't happen very often.

This is where the combination becomes extremely toxic. When large religious groups are able to control how their members vote, and those groups are controlled by capitalists, the results are not good for most of the population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. It has nothing to do with being smart.
If capitalism controls the funding, media and agenda of an election, the outcome is foregone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. That's a pretty fatalistic point of view
Does that mean that you or I are making bad mistakes in our voting decisions? Should I have gone straight-ticket Republican last election rather than straight-ticket Democratic? Should I just throw a dart at the board to make my decision, since by your logic "the outcome is {a} foregone {conclusion}".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. It is only if you believe elections are the chief means of social change.
Capitalism doesn't buy that. We would be foolish to accept that as true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I don't think of elections as the primary means of social change
Edited on Sun May-02-10 11:58 AM by EvolveOrConvolve
However, I do think they have a large impact on the regulation of capitalism.

On Edit: I also believe that elections have little impact on the regulation of toxic religion. Rather, I think it's the other way around: toxic religions have a large impact on our elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Capitalism can be regulated.
In theory.

Religion not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Can it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Ever heard of the New Deal? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Sure. Ever heard of Goldman Sachs?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Goldman's shenanigans don't reflect the effectiveness of the New Deal
Edited on Sun May-02-10 05:50 PM by uberllama42
The New Deal regulatory regime was dismantled years ago, and you know that. The fact remains that the Savings and Loan debacle didn't happen until the regulations preventing it were dismantled, and the housing crash of 2008 didn't happen until the regulations preventing it were dismantled.

Just because capitalism isn't regulated the right way in the US today doesn't mean it can't be.

edit: spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. No but it shows the difficulty of regulating captalism.
It's like drawing a line down the middle of a river.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. Interesting question.
When a religion becomes a capitalist enterprise, it's not a religion any more. Most religions more resemble media empires than any real practice of faith.


When capitalism becomes a religion, it stops working as well. The sub prime crisis was little more than made up faith in the quality of derivatives divorced from reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkstar3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. I voted for religion, but of course you saw that coming. If you'd like to read why...
Your question is too limited. Are we talking worldwide, or just in the US? Are we talking about over the course of history, just currently, or just from now to the indistinct future?

If you limit your question only to the US and only to the present and near future, I think you can make the case that capitalism does more damage to society than religion. I don't think I would agree with that case, given the incredible number of religiously-motivated actions taking place of late, but I still think you could put together an argument and have a real discussion on which causes more damage if you are using these qualifications of time and location.

Now, if you zoom out to the entire world, it really doesn't matter what timeframe you limit your question to, because religion most certainly does more damage to society than capitalism. You need only look at the worldwide plight of women, gays, and local religious minorities to see just how divisive, destructive, and horrific religion has been to society as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
23. Since you were conveniently non-specific
...and just put "religion", the answer is pretty obvious.

Capitalism is just a tool, it can be used for good or ill. Religion is a mindset. You want to know when Capitalism gets really, REALLY destructive? When people stop treating it like a tool and start treating it like a religion. When they adopt unquestioning FAITH that it will always work right in any situation without understanding exactly how instead of dealing with the subject objectively and empirically.

And that's without getting into all the other areas of life religious attitudes turnthe critical thinking parts of peoples brains off with detrimental results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. As Karl Marx said, "Religion is the opiate of the masses."
I think faith is what enables unbridled capitalism to do so much damage... how many right-wing churches out there specifically endorse unbridled capitalism as part of the tenets of their faith? Religion is the force that enables capitalism to do so much damage to society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Marx was saying that religion was the anesthetic that dulled the pain
created by capitalism. I've never seen any serious examination of Marx that said he thought religion was the greater of the two evils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
31. It starts with corrupted religion and then goes from there
Ones does need to define what religion is and how that religion is practiced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Read Engels. Religion comes much later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
34. What does this have to do with critical thinking?
Especially if you're implying that critical thinking would lead to one clear answer in favor of either religion or capitalism.

Personal value choices that are non-rational (not necessarily the same as irrational) will enter greatly into what one considers "damage". For me, the idea of living under the delusions of religion is in and of itself a form of damage. Others, even some people who say their "believers" are pretty flippant about factual truth and quite happy for people to believe anything, whether it's demonstrably true or not, if it gives them things like "comfort" and "purpose".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Your post has nothing to do with critical thinking.
It has lots to do with inescapable presuppositions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Please, don't trouble yourself with things like pointing out exactly...
...what you're criticizing, the banal literalism of actually saying what you mean in detail, when the smug "you should know what I mean, and if you can't figure it out, you're not worthy of it" attitude is working so well for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Ok, I won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. Nothing wrong with
Capitalism as an Economic system as long as it is transparent and well regulated. (I know, it often isn't) but it is a sound financial platform.
Religion, on the other hand, is all based on untruths and lead people to waste there time at best and horrible wrongs at worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. The capitalism you describe is as nonexistent as the religious untruths you despise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironbark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #35
45. Chocolate covered Capitalism.
Chocolate and Slavery:
http://www1.american.edu/ted/chocolate-slave.htm
There are about 600,000 cocoa farms in Cote d'Ivoire (Child Labor Coalition). Estimates of the number of children forced to work as slaves on these farms are as high as 15,000 (Save the Children Canada).

http://povertyworlddevelopment.suite101.com/article.cfm/child-labour-and-human-trafficking-in-the-cocoa-trade
“The United States of America is the biggest consumer of chocolate with big Corporations such as Nestle sourcing some of their cocoa beans from some West African farms that are reported to use child labour. U.S Congressman Eliot Engel proposed legislation in 2001 that required that any chocolate sold in the U.S should carry labels stating that it was Slave-Labour-Free or Child-Slave-Labour-Free, but settled for an industry regulated six-point plan, whereby the corporation’s would work towards sourcing their cocoa from child labour-free farms. Engel with Senator Tom Harkin set up the ICI (International Cocoa Initiative) in cooperation with the cocoa industry, which would work towards eradicating child slavery in the cocoa trade.

Despite these efforts, the giants of chocolate are well aware of the inhumane practices involved in cocoa farming and it is apparent that for some manufacturers, supply and demand dictates their actions.”

US Cocoa traders currently make up to one million dollars a day speculating on the price of Cocoa.
Wall St traders interviewed for ‘Chocolate: The Bitter Truth’ http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2010/s2885745.htm
declared they had no interest in the origins of the Cocoa beans or who was involved in picking them.

That's >one single issue< within the context of Capitalism.

Please show me a parallel within the context of religion.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
40. "Capitalism" and "religion" are vague and abstract terms, either of which
might (or might not) refer to a variety of particular distinct concrete events located at specific places in definite time

The discussion in this forum hardly ever (if ever) reaches the level of identifying the actual contexts within which any "production of consciousness" occurs; the differing myths, by which people understand the local worlds in which they live, are produced in a multiplicity of manners: by upbringing, by the socialization from of the schools, by traditions reflecting events fifty or a hundred years earlier, by interaction with neighbors and coworkers whose social position usually reflects one's own position, by the instruments of mass media and mass entertainment (both conditioned by corporate interests) -- all of which are almost always invisible to the individual who navigates these cultural seas

Anyone actually interested in social change and a general project of human liberation must work with other (real definite concrete named sweating eating working) humans and must experimentally attempt to unmask the actual social forces that would support or oppose the needed democratic changes. Clear thinking is rare indeed, because the forces of reaction have every material motive to keep us thinking incoherently like idiots about nothing whatsoever

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Agreed, especially your last sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironbark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. Also agree.
“"Capitalism" and "religion" are vague and abstract terms…”

Capitalism may be restrained, governed or laissez-faire.
Religion may be a term referring to a Revelation/Scripture, the Church/organizations arising or the laity/members thereof.

I will, however, stand by the observation that a direct contemporary causal link can be made between unrestrained capitalism and the death of tens of thousands that cannot be made in regard religion.

“The discussion in this forum hardly ever (if ever) reaches the level of identifying the actual contexts within which any "production of consciousness" occurs; the differing myths, by which people understand the local worlds in which they live…”

LOL!
Why should such discussion ever attempt to do so when the truth is known and revealed in drive by Blipvert backed by animated emoticon? ;-)
I do apologise Struggle, I know that what you propose aught not strike me as improbably funny….but it does ;-)

None the less…In light of the OP and your observation re "production of consciousness"…I had wondered what the OP poll results might be if the 34million American annual recipients of aid and assistance from the Salvation Army (alone) could afford a computer…or domicile to house it?

“…by the instruments of mass media and mass entertainment (both conditioned by corporate interests) -- all of which are almost always invisible to the individual who navigates these cultural seas”

Do you remember the media hours/days immediately following 9/11? The footage played almost as a continuous loop of an old woman and a handful of youth in the West Bank dancing/celebrating? Played over and over again on Fox’n’ CNN it gave the impression this was the response of the entire Muslim world.
It took six months and release of the documentary ‘Letter to America’ to reveal that on the evening of 9/11 ten thousand Iranians came spontaneously onto the streets of Tehran and held a three night candlelight vigil.
Citizens of “The Axis of Evil” navigating these cultural seas.

“Anyone actually interested in social change and a general project of human liberation must work with other (real definite concrete named sweating eating working) humans and must experimentally attempt to unmask the actual social forces that would support or oppose the needed democratic changes.”

Amen.
Simply.
Amen.

“Clear thinking is rare indeed, because the forces of reaction have every material motive to keep us thinking incoherently like idiots about nothing whatsoever”

Ahhhhhhhh Struggle…..The new Priest/Shamans of the First Church of Unfettered Capitalism (“forces of reaction”) have us by the short’n’curlies in ways we cannot even imagine-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyQjr1YL0zg

Watch it and weep…They "have every material motive" and put a spell on us all.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironbark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
42. Great thread rug and fascinating/revealing results .
A cursory scan of the posts thus far reveals very little in the way of >specific< (or verifiable in degree) damage done by religion. Most are broad brush generalisations-

“Both are a means of controlling society economically”
“fucked by the system”
“if your religion is being used to quash your opportunity to find employment”
“deregulation of financial markets” (tracked to Moral Majority)
“large religious groups are able to control how their members vote”
“Most religions more resemble media empires”
“the idea of living under the delusions of religion is in and of itself a form of damage”
“ religion most certainly does more damage to society than capitalism. You need only look at the worldwide plight of women, gays, and local religious minorities to see just how divisive, destructive, and horrific religion has been to society as a whole.”
“Religion, on the other hand, is all based on untruths and lead people to waste there time at best and horrible wrongs at worst.”

The only real counter voice offering the damage done by capitalism appears to be yours rug ;-)

I find this non specific general bias a little surprising as unrestrained and poorly regulated capitalism flows millions of barrels of oil down pristine coastline.
Perhaps the OP question might be rephrased to ask- “What is more likely to kill the planet/us all …religion or capitalism”?

My vote is that capitalism (unrestrained) is far more likely to pose such a threat.

In terms of specific and verifiable/quantifiable damage-
Unrestrained Capitalism leads to the daily death, maiming, disability and impoverishment of tens of thousands-
Tobacco and Alcohol, Arms sales, Pharmaceutical price fixing, Environmental destruction, Agricultural mismanagement, Multinational Monopolies and Third World Exploitation…
the specific list of the damage done by capitalism goes on and I am yet to see >any< post that can point to parallel damage from religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Actually, perusing the OP's posts
He doesn't seem to have made any case against capitalism. He usually avoids having any content in his posts, so this isn't surprising, but you're giving him too much credit. Other than naming Goldmand Sachs as a company that has done bad things, he hasn't put up nearly the case that's been made against religion so far.

And since you asked for a list of bad things motivated by religion:



  • First and foremost is the brutal repression of women, which has been the hallmark of almost every religion for all time. Endless amounts of repression and exploitation of women have been justified or motivated by religion throughout history.

  • Hundreds of wars have been fought explicitly over religion. The Crusades are the most-cited example, but you could point to a dozen conflicts from recent decades in which the major motivator is religious division: Northern Ireland, Sudan, Sri Lanka, the civil war in Iraq, Kashmir, Palestine.

  • The Catholic Church in particular was a powerful force in the brutal extermination of Native Americans during the conquest of South America. This was an imperialistic exercise before the advent of modern capitalism and led to the deaths of millions. The church aided in this slaughter because the heathens had to be "saved" and brought to Christ.

  • The Aztecs, by the way, vivisected human beings daily in order to vitiate their fickle sun god.

  • Incalculable resources have been wasted pursuing superstitious escapades: the pyramids, cathedrals, giant temples and statues are testament to this, though most of the religious waste in human history hasn't left behind some stone infrastructure in its wake. What might Aquinas have achieved if he hadn't wasted his life trying to justify ever word Aristotle wrote in light of every word St. Paul wrote, as if it mattered?

  • Believers have stood stalwart in the way of scientific progress. The Catholics have been on the wrong side of just about everything, from the days of intimidating Copernicus and Galileo to the sitting pope's lies about condoms.

  • The continued denial of gay rights in this country in almost exclusively the result of religiously motivated bigotry.

  • And don't forget the buggery. Centuries and centuries of powerful religious people sodomizing children. Not just the last few years.



So there is a partial list of things that have been done due to religious beliefs or by organizations that have power due to people's religious beliefs. Now what do we do? How do we know whether this is more or less damaging than capitalism? Or is this just a pissing contest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironbark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. In Brief ;-)
•“First and foremost is the brutal repression of women, which has been the hallmark of almost every religion for all time.”

Inheritance rights for women
“Among the pagan Arabs before Islam, inheritance rights were confined exclusively to the male relatives. The Quran abolished all these unjust customs and gave all the female relatives inheritance shares”
http://www.islamicity.com/mosque/w_islam/inhrt.htm
In the same pre Islamic society a female child was considered worth less than a camel and often buried alive in the sand.
If you are going to claim “brutal repression of women” as a “hallmark” of religion you will need to come up with an explanation for women in their millions voluntarily embracing religion.

•“Hundreds of wars have been fought explicitly over religion. The Crusades are the most-cited example, but you could point to a dozen conflicts from recent decades in which the major motivator is religious division: Northern Ireland, Sudan, Sri Lanka, the civil war in Iraq, Kashmir, Palestine.”

First casualty of war is Truth. You believe the leaders call to arms for a war “fought explicitly” over WMDs?
Prior to the crusades European Aristocracy was running out of fiefdoms for young princes in exactly the same way the West is running out of oil…rapidly and disastrously. The Middle East, then as now, was a prime >material< target…and any propaganda served its acquisition.
“Northern Ireland, Sri Lanka”? The post 9/11 inquiry conducted by the Pentagon into the origins/causes of terrorism found that religion was not the key causal factor. They found the common feature in terrorism was the perception of ‘foreign troops’ on their land…making specific reference to the conflict in Northern Ireland, Sri Lanka as examples and citing the US presence in Saudi Arabia. Religion, it was concluded, served primarily as a unifier in raising opposition to such foreign presence. (The Roman Empire had 33 military bases on foreign soil, the British Empire had 34…America currently has some 38 military bases on foreign soil)

•"The Catholic Church in particular was a powerful force in the brutal extermination of Native Americans during the conquest of South America. This was an imperialistic exercise before the advent of modern capitalism and led to the deaths of millions. The church aided in this slaughter because the heathens had to be "saved" and brought to Christ."

Not even the blunt instrument of Wiki will pay that one-
“European diseases (smallpox, influenza, measles and typhus) to which the native populations had no resistance decimated the American population, as wells as cruel systems of forced labor (such as encomiendas and mining industry's mita) under Spanish control. Following this, African slaves, who had developed immunity to these diseases, were quickly brought in to replace them.The Spaniards were committed to converting their American subjects to Christianity and were quick to purge any native cultural practices that hindered this end. However, most initial attempts at this were only partially successful; American groups simply blended Catholicism with their traditional beliefs. The Spaniards did not impose their language to the degree they did their religion. In fact, the missionary work of the Roman Catholic Church in Quechua, Nahuatl, and Guarani actually contributed to the expansion of these American languages, equipping them with writing systems.”
Disease and forced labor introduced by Colonial expansionist interests…no mention of “Catholic Church in particular was a powerful force in the brutal extermination”.
Got a link for that?

•“Believers have stood stalwart in the way of scientific progress. The Catholics have been on the wrong side of just about everything, from the days of intimidating Copernicus and Galileo to the sitting pope's lies about condoms.”

- Rene Descarte 1596-1650 mathematician and philosopher
René Descartes one of the key thinkers of the Scientific Revolution in
the Western World. honoured by having the Cartesian coordinate system
used in plane geometry and algebra named after him. He did important
work on invariants and geometry. His Meditations on First Philosophy
partially concerns theology and he was devoted to reconciling his ideas
with the dogmas of Catholic Faith to which he was loyal.
I see everywhere the inevitable expression of the infinite in the world
- Louis Pasteur 1822-95
As a blind man has no idea of colours, so have we no idea of the manner
by which the All-Wise God perceives and understands all things.
- Sir Isaac Newton 1642-1727
The scientific picture of the real world around me is very
deficient...Science cannot tell us why music delights us, of why and how
an old song can move us to tears.... Science is reticent too when it is
a question of the great Unity... of which we all somehow form a part, to
which we belong. The most popular name for it in our time is God.
- Erwin Schroedinger 1933 Nobel prize in Physics
"My view of the World" 1918
There can never be any real opposition between religion and science.
Every serious and reflective person realizes, I think, that the
religious elements in his nature must be recognized and cultivated if
all the powers of the human soul are to act together in perfect balance
and harmony.
- Max Planck winner of the 1918 Nobel prize in Physics
"Where is Science Going" 1918
"Something unknown is doing we don't know what"
-Sir Arthur Eddington
Religion and science are the two wings upon which man's intelligence can
soar into the heights, with which the human soul can progress. It is not
possible to fly with one wing alone! Should a man try to fly with the
wing of religion alone he would quickly fall into the quagmire of
superstition, whilst on the other hand, with the wing of science alone
he would make no progress, but fall into the despairing slough of
materialism. - 'Abdu'l - Baha "Paris Talks" 1911
Fred Hoyle (British astrophysicist): "A common sense interpretation of
the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as
well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces
worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the
facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost
beyond question." (2)
George Ellis (British astrophysicist): "Amazing fine tuning occurs in
the laws that make this possible. Realization of the
complexity of what is accomplished makes it very difficult not to use
the word 'miraculous' without taking a stand as to the ontological
status of the word." (3)
Alan Sandage (winner of the Crawford prize in astronomy): "I find it
quite improbable that such order came out of chaos. There has to be
some organizing principle. God to me is a mystery but is the
explanation for the miracle of existence, why there is something
instead of nothing." (6)
John O'Keefe (astronomer at NASA): "We are, by astronomical standards,
a pampered, cosseted, cherished group of creatures.. .. If the
Universe had not been made with the most exacting precision we could
never have come into existence. It is my view that these circumstances
indicate the universe was created for man to live in." (7)
George Greenstein (astronomer): "As we survey all the evidence, the
thought insistently arises that some supernatural agency - or, rather,
Agency - must be involved. Is it possible that suddenly, without
intending to, we have stumbled upon scientific proof of the existence
of a Supreme Being? Was it God who stepped in and so providentially
crafted the cosmos for our benefit?" (8)
Arthur Eddington (astrophysicist): "The idea of a universal mind or
Logos would be, I think, a fairly plausible inference from the present
state of scientific theory." (9)
Arno Penzias (Nobel prize in physics): "Astronomy leads us to a unique
event, a universe which was created out of nothing, one with the very
delicate balance needed to provide exactly the conditions required to
permit life, and one which has an underlying (one might say
'supernatural') plan." (10)
Roger Penrose (mathematician and author): "I would say the universe
has a purpose. It's not there just somehow by chance." (11)
Tony Rothman (physicist): "When confronted with the order and beauty
of the universe and the strange coincidences of nature, it's very
tempting to take the leap of faith from science into religion. I am
sure many physicists want to. I only wish they would admit it." (12)
Vera Kistiakowsky (MIT physicist): "The exquisite order displayed by
our scientific understanding of the physical world calls for the
divine." (13)
Robert Jastrow (self-proclaimed agnostic): "For the scientist who has
lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad
dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to
conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he
is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for
centuries." (14)
Stephen Hawking (British astrophysicist): "Then we shall… be able to
take part in the discussion of the question of why it is that we and
the universe exist. If we find the answer to that, it would be the
ultimate triumph of human reason - for then we would know the mind of
God." (15)
Frank Tipler (Professor of Mathematical Physics): "When I began my
career as a cosmologist some twenty years ago, I was a convinced
atheist. I never in my wildest dreams imagined that one day I would be
writing a book purporting to show that the central claims of Judeo-
Christian theology are in fact true, that these claims are
straightforward deductions of the laws of physics as we now understand
them. I have been forced into these conclusions by the inexorable
logic of my own special branch of physics." (16) Note: Tipler since
has actually converted to Christianity, hence his latest book, The
Physics Of Christianity.
Alexander Polyakov (Soviet mathematician): "We know that nature is
described by the best of all possible mathematics because God created
it."(17)
Ed Harrison (cosmologist): "Here is the cosmological proof of the
existence of God – the design argument of Paley – updated and
refurbished. The fine tuning of the universe provides prima facie
evidence of deistic design. Take your choice: blind chance that
requires multitudes of universes or design that requires only one....
Many scientists, when they admit their views, incline toward the
teleological or design argument." (18)
Edward Milne (British cosmologist): "As to the cause of the Universe,
in context of expansion, that is left for the reader to insert, but
our picture is incomplete without Him ." (19)
Barry Parker (cosmologist): "Who created these laws? There is no
question but that a God will always be needed." (20)
Drs. Zehavi, and Dekel (cosmologists): "This type of universe,
however, seems to require a degree of fine tuning of the initial
conditions that is in apparent conflict with 'common wisdom'." (21)
Arthur L. Schawlow (Professor of Physics at Stanford University, 1981
Nobel Prize in physics): "It seems to me that when confronted with the
marvels of life and the universe, one must ask why and not just how.
The only possible answers are religious. . . . I find a need for God
in the universe and in my own life." (22)
Henry "Fritz" Schaefer (Graham Perdue Professor of Chemistry and
director of the Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry at the
University of Georgia): "The significance and joy in my science comes
in those occasional moments of discovering something new and saying to
myself, 'So that's how God did it.' My goal is to understand a little
corner of God's plan." (23)
Wernher von Braun (Pioneer rocket engineer) "I find it as difficult to
understand a scientist who does not acknowledge the presence of a
superior rationality behind the existence of the universe as it is to
comprehend a theologian who would deny the advances of science." (24)
Carl Woese (microbiologist from the University of Illinois) "Life in
Universe - rare or unique? I walk both sides of that street. One day I
can say that given the 100 billion stars in our galaxy and the 100
billion or more galaxies, there have to be some planets that formed
and evolved in ways very, very like the Earth has, and so would
contain microbial life at least. There are other days when I say that
the anthropic principal, which makes this universe a special one out
of an uncountably large number of universes, may not apply only to
that aspect of nature we define in the realm of physics, but may
extend to chemistry and biology. In that case life on Earth could be
entirely unique." (25)
"The human mind is not capable of grasping the Universe. We are like a
little child entering a huge library. The walls are covered to the
ceilings with books in many different tongues. The child knows that
someone must have written these books. It does not know who or how. It
does not understand the languages in which they are written. But the
child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books - a
mysterious order which it does not comprehend, but only dimly
suspects." - Albert Einstein
"The statistical probability that organic structures and the most
precisely harmonized reactions that typify living organisms would be
generated by accident, is zero."- Ilya Prigogine (Chemist-Physicist)
Recipient of two Nobel Prizes in chemistry
I. Prigogine, N. Gregair, A. Babbyabtz, Physics Today 25, pp. 23-28
"The really amazing thing is not that life on Earth is balanced on a
knife-edge, but that the entire universe is balanced on a knife-edge,
and would be total chaos if any of the natural 'constants' were off
even slightly. You see," Davies adds, "even if you dismiss man as a
chance happening, the fact remains that the universe seems
unreasonably suited to the existence of life -- almost contrived --
you might say a 'put-up job'."- Dr. Paul Davies
(noted author and Professor of Theoretical Physics at Adelaide
University)
Sir Francis Bacon - established the scientific method of inquiry based
on experimentation and inductive reasoning.
Nicolaus Copernicus Catholic canon who introduced a heliocentric world view.
William Turner the "father of English botany"
John Napier Scottish mathematician known for inventing logarithms,
Napier's bones, and being the popularizer of the use of decimals.
Johannes Kepler His model of the cosmos based on nesting Platonic solids
was explicitly driven by religious ideas; his later and most famous
scientific contribution, the Kepler's laws of planetary motion, was
based on empirical data that he obtained from Tycho Brahe's meticulous
astronomical observations,
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us
with senses, reason and intellect has intended us to forego their use
and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can obtain by
them. He would not require us to deny sense and reason in physical
matters which are set before our eyes and minds by direct experience or
necessary demonstrations.
- Galileo Galilei 1615.
..science can only be created by those who are thoroughly imbued with
the aspiration toward truth and understanding. This source of feeling,
however, springs from the sphere of Religion... science without religion
is lame, religion without science is blind.
- Albert Einstein "Ideas and Opinions" 1954
The glory and greatness of the Almighty God are marvellously discerned
in all His works and divinely read in the open book of heaven
- Galileo Galilei 1564-1642
Blaise Pascal well-known for Pascal's law (physics), Pascal's theorem
(math), and Pascal's Wager (theology).
Nicolas Steno a pioneer in both anatomy and geology
Robert Boyle Scientist and theologian who argued that the study of
science could improve glorification of God.
John Wallis As a mathematician he wrote Arithmetica Infinitorumis,
introduced the term Continued fraction, worked on cryptography, helped
develop calculus, and is further known for the Wallis product.
Gottfried Leibniz A polymath who worked on determinants, a calculating
machine
Isaac Newton (He is regarded as one of the greatest scientists and
mathematicians in history.
Thomas Bayes Bayes' theorem. Fellow of the Royal Society
Firmin Abauzit A physicist and theologian.
Carolus Linnaeus father of modern taxonomy, contributions to ecology.
Leonhard Euler mathematician and physicist,
Maria Gaetana Agnesi mathematician
Isaac Milner Lucasian Professor of Mathematics
Michael Faraday
Charles Babbage
Gregor Mendel "father of modern genetics"
Asa Gray - Gray's Manual remains a pivotal work in botany.
Louis Pasteur Inventor of the pasteurization method, a french chemist
and microbiologist. He also solved the mysteries of rabies, anthrax,
chicken cholera, and silkworm diseases, and contributed to the
development of the first vaccines.
Lord Kelvin Thermodynamics. winner of the Copley Medal and the Royal Medal,
Pierre Duhem Thermodynamic potentials
Dmitri Egorov mathematician - differential geometry
John Ambrose Flemingthe Right-hand rule and work on vacuum tubes,
Fleming valve. the Hughes Medal.
Max Planck founder of Quantum mechanics (1918 Nobel Prize in Physics
Edward Arthur Milne astrophysicist and mathematician proposed the Milne
model and had a Moon crater named for him. Gold Medal of the Royal
Astronomical Society,
Arthur Compton Nobel Prize in Physics.
Georges Lemaître proposed the Big Bang theory. Roman Catholic priest
Sir Robert Boyd pioneer in British space science
von Weizsäcker nuclear physicist Bethe-Weizsäcker formula.
Charles Hard Townes 1964 Nobel Prize in Physics 1966 wrote The
Convergence of Science and Religion.
Freeman Dyson the Lorentz Medal, the Max Planck Medal, and the Lewis
Thomas Prize.
John T. Houghtonco-chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change gold medal from the Royal Astronomical Society.
Micha? Heller mathematical physicist relativistic physics and
Noncommutative geometry.
Eric PriestSolar Magnetohydrodynamics , won the George Ellery Hale Prize
Francis Collins director of the US National Human Genome Research Institute.
John D. Barrow English cosmologist implications of the Anthropic principle.
Denis Alexander Director of the Faraday Institute and author of
Rebuilding the Matrix - Science and Faith in the 21st Century.
Christopher IshamTheoretical physicist who developed HPO formalism.
Martin NowakEvolutionary biologist and mathematician best known for
evolutionary dynamics.

And that's just a partial list of Western scientists who were believers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Muslim_scientists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC