The down side of being an atheist...

[GKirk]

...you don't get to say "I told you so!" when you die. :)

[notesdev]

1. You can always have it

etched on your gravestone

[AmandaRuth]

2. also

no one to talk to during sex. :) :* :evilgrin:

[cullen7282]

3. lmao

Thanks for my first laugh of the day!

[toddaa]

6. You do realize that some forms of sex involve more than one person

:evilgrin: back at ya.

[AlecBGreen]

8. or only one person

:P

[toddaa]

9. That just brings us right back to the Imaginary Friend

And where'd all the kleenex go?

:P back to you

[cleanhippie]

10. Well played, sir.

:applause:

[AlecBGreen]

18. i bow before your superior ass-handing skills

well played

[cleanhippie]

19. That was pretty funny.

Gonna have to remember that one.

[rock]

4. So it's exactly the same as for the religious

How ironic

[laconicsax]

5. +1

[GKirk]

7. I suppose I should have said...

...the downside of being an atheist and being right is not getting to say "I told you so".
Versus a believer being right and getting to enjoy watching me burn in hell for all enternity.

[dimbear]

11. Hitler, Gandhi, Franco, Carl Sagan, all in the same place now.

That actually ticks me off.

Still, it's the facts.

That's the downside.

[laconicsax]

12. I don't think that being dead makes for a sort of fraternity.

You don't exist, then you do, then you don't again.

[MikeH]

13. I would not be too quick to say that it is the "facts"

Hitler, Gandhi, Franco, Carl Sagan, all in the same place now.


That actually ticks me off.

Still, it's the facts.

Perhaps it is true. I don't know.

Given what you know, I would understand that you regard it as being an overwhelming probability.

However it is possible, however unlikely it might seem to you, that they might still be alive in a next world.

I don't think science can absolutely prove for certain that these people are all "in the same place" right now.

Sometimes science does find things out that go against previously accepted conventional wisdom.

Maybe overwhelming probability, but I would not say those are the "facts".

Personal disclosure: I would consider myself to be just on the believing side of agnostic, and closest to being a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deism">Deist. I used to be a Christian, but am not any more. However I have some of my own reasons for having problems with being an atheist. I consider both the matter of God and the matter of life after this present life to be open questions for me.

[dimbear]

14. I hope you are right.

I believe you are wrong.

In either case I wish you luck.

[MikeH]

16. Thanks

:)

[kwassa]

15. All four of them are in the ground? What's wrong with that?

Good fertilizer.

[Deep13]

17. True, but you get to not care that you told them so. nt