Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barry Bonds' lawyers take another swing at government's case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 12:39 PM
Original message
Barry Bonds' lawyers take another swing at government's case
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 12:40 PM by JonLP24
Former San Francisco Giant Barry Bonds, who used to spend this week each year at baseball's All-Star Game festivities, instead is locked once more in a legal tangle over the federal government's attempt to rejuvenate its perjury case against him.

In court papers filed Wednesday, Bonds' legal team is contesting federal prosecutors' latest legal salvo aimed at persuading a federal appeals court to allow them to use crucial evidence against Bonds, including three positive steroid tests allegedly linked to baseball's home run king.

Bonds' lawyers asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reject the government's effort to overturn a San Francisco federal judge's decision earlier this year excluding the evidence. U.S. District Judge Susan Illston barred prosecutors from using the evidence on the eve of Bonds' trial in March, concluding that the drug tests and other evidence, such as drug logs, could not be linked to the former superstar without the account of his former personal trainer, Greg Anderson.

Anderson has repeatedly refused to testify against Bonds, even serving a year in federal prison at one point after being found in contempt. Bonds faces 10 counts of perjury and one count of obstructing justice for allegedly lying to a federal grand jury in December 2003 about using steroids as he chased baseball's all-time home run records.

"The government determined it would have great difficulty obtaining a conviction without the cooperation of Mr. Anderson," Bonds' lawyers wrote to the 9th Circuit. "It therefore put Mr. Anderson in jail for over a year. Because that bore no fruit, the government seeks instead to obtain a conviction based on hearsay — untested, unconfronted out-of-court statements.
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_12846698

Barry Bonds' lawyers want to keep ban of allegedly positive steroid tests from perjury trial

A team of lawyers defending Barry Bonds from perjury charges filed an appellate brief Wednesday arguing that the federal judge overseeing the BALCO prosecution was correct to exclude allegedly positive steroid tests and other evidence from the slugger's upcoming trial.

The government seeks to "obtain a conviction based on hearsay - untested, unconfronted, out-of-court statements," Bonds' seven lawyers said in a 68-page argument filed with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

Early this year, U.S. District Court Judge Susan Illston barred the evidence when it became clear that Bonds' former trainer, Greg Anderson, would refuse to take the stand, apparently making it impossible for prosecutors to link the evidence to Bonds.

In March, just days before the Bonds trial was set to begin, prosecutors decided to appeal Illston's decision. Since then, both sides have argued over whether documents seized during the BALCO raid constitute hearsay.
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/2009/07/16/2009-07-16_barry_bonds.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why hasn't the government withdrew its paperwork? Or does it enjoy being
humiliated in the courtroom?

No lawyer is any match against the bonds (so to speak) of friendship and loyalty and a smart federal judge.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. They'll never wirthdraw...they know he's guilty and are p*ssed that
Bonds thinks everyone is stupid enough to agree with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. So what are they going to say on the day they officially lose?
Are they going to whine and bitch that Bonds is still really guilty no matter what .. or are they going to have respect for Lady Justice, of our court system -- apologize to Barry and myself, and admit they made a mistake?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hey, OJ is still guilty...
...we're talking about the law here, not justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I can understand why prosecutors would relentlessly pursue a double
killer like OJ ... especially since there was so much evidence.

But going after Barry like this is a disgrace.

The judge is being so nice, giving them an opportunity to bow out and save some of their dignity, by telling them ahead of time they don't have enough evidence to win beyond a reasonable doubt.

Then again, what do you expect from Alberto Gonzalez the liar's guys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Was it a steroid enhanced swing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC