Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keith Olbermann from Cooperstown on Pete Rose In Hall of Fame (You Tube)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 09:42 PM
Original message
Keith Olbermann from Cooperstown on Pete Rose In Hall of Fame (You Tube)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent, Jack.
You open the door for Pete....you open it for all the scalawags. Tru's right. Shoeless Joe. Get ready.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Selig is only opening the door to the Roiders. Let Rose in, then
Rose-Barroid-2012!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. As KO said . . .
Becuase of the roiders, Rose's sins look a lot more venial. Taking steroids can endanger one's health and there were cases of children ruining theirs because they took PEDs.

Whether or not the roiders are to be honored as great players in the future is an issue will have to be discussed on its own merits. It's a separate matter.

As for Pete Rose, for my money he should be in the HoF. He played the game as it ought to be played. No one ever accused Rose of giving less that everything he had for the most minute advantage for his team. It isn't the use of steroids that really make him look good, it's the sight of millionaires running out a ground ball 45 feet and giving up. Where is the Pete Rose intensity in these players?

Rose has served a 20-year suspension, served a prison sentence and admitted his wrong doing. He paid his pound of flesh long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I didn't say it nearly as well as you did, but I think Pete Rose belongs
in the HoF. He always annoyed the hell out of me (being a Pirates fan), but what he did as a player has shown me that he earned his way into the HoF. He never took any PED to advance his career.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Then you need to put Shoeless Joe Jackson in as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Why?
There are those making the case for Jackson. The late Ted Williams was among them. Their case for Jackson has nothing to do with Rose. But let's put that aside and assume the Jackson is guilty as charged and should stay out of the HoF. Let's assume that Jackson and others took money to fix the 1919 World Series.

Pete Rose is guilty of nothing that grave. He bet on games, including some involving the Reds while he was their field manager. He is not accused of fixing any games, let alone the World Series.

We can have a discussion about the merits of allowing Rose in the HoF without bringing up the Black Sox scandal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. WOW!
Do you really think that what Rose did was not serious? Amazing.

The dude bet on his own team while Managing it. You do realize that a Manager handles the pitching decisions---the lineup, etc?

What---you don't think that can influence a game?

Oh but the argument is---there's no proof he did--- well--- there's no proof he didn't.

So--- don't you think that a ban for life from baseball for those who bet on their own team---especially a Manager--will send a message to others who are contemplating doing it?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. It kills me to agree with you, but I'm gonna do it anyway...
...I think we're dealing with Cincy fans here who look the other way when it's one of their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I mean come on---
A Manager betting on his own team stinks to high heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I think what he did was serious
I also think the message has been sent.

I also think that small time gambling is not as serious a matter as fixing the World Series. To put them on a par, as you do, is like taking away one's driver's license for drunk and disorderly conduct because all he had to do was get behind the wheel of his car and mow down a pedestrian and it becomes felony drunk driving.

Of course it is a serious matter. Is it a serious enough matter to give Rose a lifetime ban with no possibility of repeal? No.

Also, what kind of threat does make to most players threaten to keep them out of the HoF? An idle one. A .240 hitter who averages 15 to 20 home runs with 60 RBIs a year and who fields his position just adequately isn't going to Cooperstown. What sort of penalty does he pay for gambling? If you want to be fair to Rose, then he should face a lifetime ban, which in this case means his baseball career has been abruptly terminated and nothing else. But, like Paul Hornung and Alex Karras in the NFL, he may simply be suspended for a year, or just fined, as were many other NFL players who were also caught gambling in 1962.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe he can spend an extra day or two there. Watching Howard Dean
substitute for Keith is quite a pleasure.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Dean did quite well, mad.
Very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oops. Sorry. I was talking about Howard Dean allowed in the Sports Forum?
Edited on Wed Jul-29-09 10:55 PM by madinmaryland
:shrug:

Not trying to bring GD:PPffth-2004 into teh Sports Forum.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Say you're sorry, Pete, then we'll talk...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. Gambling is an addiction
People who suffer from experience the same kind of rush that people experience from using cocaine. Then requires larger and more frequent rages to experience the same kind of rush. Treatment would've been the appropriate route instead of this kind of ban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC