Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BCS: Week 2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 07:35 PM
Original message
BCS: Week 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good. Now maybe Oregon will get by USC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not a surprise...the BSC is SEC rigged...
let's just hope all the SEC teams have 3 losses..and even then the "impartial" rankings might get them into the Championship Game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. How does everyone feel about Boise and TCU at #3 and #4??
Once again, the majors CANNOT suffer a letdown any given week. Take the Sooners. Meanwhile, these two feed on chump change. How would Boise fare in the Pac-12? TCU in the Big Eight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't have a problem with it
If Boise St can end up undefeated they deserve a shot. It would be only fair because in that case that means Boise State had 2 consecutive undefeated season. If a mid-major goes undefeated two seasons in a row and doesn't appear in a title game than the rankings aren't fair to them and their needs to be a system where mid-majors have a shot on the field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But how would Boise do in the PAC-12, Jon?
Week in, week out against primo competition? Sorry, man. I certainly don't have a problem with their out of conference slate. But I do with the rest. Win two early season games and their in? That's about what it amounts to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Better than most teams
But it would depend on recruiting mostly. It just depends how good they are and the year. Also not every team in any conference is primo competition. The Pac-10 has California who Nevada killed (Boise State opponent also in the top 25). Fresno State defeated Cincinnati by two touchdowns who Oklahoma only beat by 3. Hawaii is having a good year as well who just defeated Nevada at home. They do have some quality opponents within the conferece(only 3 this year) and they defeated Virginia Tech (who is in the top 25) and Oregon St who could finish the season in the top 25. Anyways like I said going undefeated two straight seasons should be enough for them to be in a title game. Either way it is not their fault they're locked into conference opponents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. You can't bring up comparitive scores. Doesn't work. So you think Oregon would beat Texas 100-7?
Again. My point. EVERY week the majors have to get up. Or risk getting beat. The mid-majors just don't face that type of competion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. I noticed you capitalized EVERY
Oregon just got done playing the bottom half of the conference which is sad to say because it includes my team (who gave Oregon the toughest game of the season) and Portland State as well as New Mexico. UCLA, Washington State, and Arizona State are not exactly teams you get up for. Though I'm very impressed with their win against Stanford. If you compare scores you can get idea how good a team is. UCLA has been blown out in 3 games. They are not "primo competition". Though I understand how comparing scores can be problematic. Arizona State lost to Wisconsin by 1, Oregon State by 3, and Oregon by 10 but they lost to California (who Nevada killed) by 43 points. Does that mean California would beat Wisconsin, Oregon State, or Oregon? Does that mean California would beat those teams? Probably not but they are very hot and cold team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #20
37. POST OF THE DAY! -eom-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. That's Boise's formula Condem..
schedule one or two decent teams at the beginning, then spend the rest of the season playing patsies, while at the same time sniveling about how you have been disrespected if you're not rewarded for beating up on schools like NMS, SJS, Idaho, Louisiana Tech etc..




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. It is all they can do
Are willing to acknowledge that? That Boise State are locked into conference opponents. They could schedule non-conference patsies like the big schools but they choose not too. They are doing what they can to give them the toughest schedule possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyiowan Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. On this we totally agree!
There are great teams locked into less than stellar conferences. And it's a problem. A solution for which I don't have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyiowan Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. There is a substantive difference...
in terms of the toll a major conference schedule takes. It requires remaining focused mentally and emotionally not to mention the injuries a team sustains playing tough opponents week after week. I don't have a solution for the whole BCS conundrum, but I do think that the mid-majors have it easier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I really don't think mid-majors have it easy
They can go undefeated all they want and even in years with only 1-loss teams they still get shut out of the National Championship. I agree that the major conferences overall are tougher but a lot of those teams *cough* Florida *cough* schedule very weak non-conference games and they also have weak opponents within major conferences. Anyways I've wondered how a team like Boise State can make it and figured it would take them to schedule tough non-conference opponents (which they have) and go undefeated multiple seasons(which they might). It is only fair if there is only 1-loss teams and they happen to be undefeated. Playoffs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyiowan Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I suppose I think that it's the year in and out part
that is totally different. I just happen to think that is easier to do in a mid-major. The SEC, Big 12, Big Ten, PAC-10 schedules are hard to survive undefeated year after year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Don't forget about Utah
They will play TCU. And only one of them can remain undefeated. Boise State will join the MWC and Utah will join the PAC12. Both will be contenders again next year.

As far as the Big12 - those schools must be very glad that they didn't invite TCU to join in 1996.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. El. You missed your calling.
Stand-up comedy is all you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. At least my back yard doesn't look like a carnival freak show!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyiowan Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. It's just a carnival...
Won't be a freak show 'til you get me that blue horse!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I think everyone knows that neither of these teans goes undefeated in a strong conference
A good season would have them with at least two losses and in a scrub bowl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. I was under the impression that the Ducks would be #1
Well, no matter, 2 is good enough. And clubs like Auburn serve a purpose, for they keep Boise, and any other team that is big on talk and short on a decent resume, from attaining a position they don't deserve..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. The ducks have historically been dissed by the bogus computer system
The NY Times recently had an excellent piece of just how bogus it's "numbers" are and there's also a new book on the system that pulls a lot of previously disparate information together.

Numbers Are a Weak Spot in the B.C.S. Standings


Since the inception of the B.C.S. in 1998, it has used the computers as a shield against cries of partisanship in the polls that make up the other two-thirds of the formula. One of the computer rankers for the B.C.S. is Richard Billingsley, a stress-management expert from Hugo, Okla.

His knowledge of college football history is encyclopedic. His knowledge of mathematics, the foundation of any accurate computer-ranking system, is not.

“I’m not a mathematician,” Billingsley said. “I’m not even a highly educated man, to tell you the truth. I don’t even have a degree. I have a high school education. I never had calculus. I don’t even remember much about algebra. I think everyone questions everything I do. Why is he doing that? Does he know what he’s doing, a crazy kook in Oklahoma?”

The short answer is no. Billingsley’s ranking system is vilified by professional mathematicians and a subculture of amateur computer rankers. His is not the only one. The stringent rules placed by the B.C.S. on the computers — they must, for example, exclude margin of victory from their formulas, making 10-7 equivalent to 70-7 — turned them into the laughingstock of the numbers community. Two of the computer analysts, Jeff Sagarin and Kenneth Massey, acknowledge that their rankings for the B.C.S. are not the most accurate they can produce.

More: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/17/sports/ncaafootball/17score.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. They should include margin of victory
Edited on Sun Oct-24-10 08:53 PM by JonLP24
but cap it off at 21 points for the maximum points scored in margin of victory to prevent teams from running up the score just to score more BCS points. Of course there will be teams kicking unnecessary field goals up by 18 or so but 21 is a good limit I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Not only that but consider:
How the Ducks rank in the NCAA: LaMichael James (161.8 yards per game) still leads the nation in rushing, ahead of Michigan quarterback Denard Robinson (156.6) and Oklahoma State running back Kendall Hunter (147.3).

Darron Thomas has climbed to 18th in passing efficiency, and his 9.50 touchdown percentage (17 of his 179 passes have been for scores) equals that of Stanford's Andrew Luck and trails only Boise State's Kellen Moore.

As a team, Oregon leads the nation by a wide margin in total offense (569.1 yards per game) and scoring offense (55.1 points per game).

The Ducks (308.4 yards per game) rank third in rushing offense, behind the grounded attacks of Air Force (326.5) and Georgia Tech (317.4) and just ahead of Auburn (303.3).

The Ducks rank 30th in total defense (331.6 yards per game), with 12 teams stingier on yards per play than Oregon's 4.50. And they are 12th in scoring defense (15.9 points per game).

Oregon also leads the nation in turnover margin (25 takeaways and 13 giveaways), and its punt return defense (7 returns, 8 yards) has been spectacular but not as good as Notre Dame's (7 returns, 3 yards).

More: http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindducksbeat/2010/10/oregon_football_ducks_preparin.html">Oregon football: Ducks, preparing for USC, are still No. 2 by BCS logic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Remember Belotti's famous remark?
“I liken the BCS to a bad disease, like cancer" The Ducks were outright robbed that year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. TCU vs Boise for the NC,
Could very well happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. If that happens..
I think they'll be a major outcry. Many think the BCS buster stories are cute and all that, but the vast majority of knowledgeable football fans know these two teams couldn't compete in a major conference week in and week out and still retain those impressive records.

IMO, these two teams don't even deserve to be in the top ten, let alone the top two..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Long way to go, Upton.
But at this point, peering into the crystal ball, the SEC, Big Twelve and the Big Ten will have one loss teams. Which leaves Oregon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. No Duck fan forgets that
That Ducks team could easily have beaten either of the teams that played in the Rose Bowl for the national title but had to settle for the Tostitos bowl and #2 ranking to end the season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. USC, depa.
Please. By all means. Run up the score.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Yep..
and the Nebraska team that was picked by the BCS formula over the Ducks was ranked below them in the polls, had given up over 60 points to Colorado in their final regular season game and didn't even win their conference. Of course, they were routed by Miami in the title game. It was one of the most outrageous injustices I have ever seen in college sports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. And the Ducks, #2 in both major polls at the time- got bounced down to #4 by the bogus computers
Edited on Sun Oct-24-10 09:21 PM by depakid
then turned around and creamed Colorado in the Tostito bowl 38-16 (and it wasn't even that close).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. well, I think it's a stretch to say the Ducks could easily have beaten the Hurricanes
"That Ducks team could easily have beaten either of the teams that played in the Rose Bowl for the national title ..."

The Miami Hurricanes were undefeated that year, unlike the Ducks. Yes, I think the Ducks could have handled Nebraska, and I totally agree that the Ducks should have gone to the Rose Bowl that year to see if maybe they could knock off the Hurricanes--but nothing about that game would have likely been easy for Oregon. (That might not be what you meant, though. :))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Let's just say it wouldn't have been as easy as thrashing Colorado
but still one I'd have put money on (especially if the spread were to favor the canes).

And I'm not much of a gambler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
33. If Michigan State wins this week then they are in the driver seat
That is a big if though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC