|
I tend to remember little details like that. Comes in handy when bozos in Las Vegas sportsbooks come up with ridiculous arguments, similar to yours.
Cincinnati passed for more than 300 yards in what would have been the most embarrassing defeat in Buckeyes history, narrowly avoided. Clarett was out that game with injury. Admittedly I was wary of blue collar Ohio State all year as a Canes fan so I remember every desperate Ohio State escape. If they'd lost one time among all the razor finishes -- Cincinnati, Penn State, Illinois, Purdue, Michigan -- Miami would have cruised in a title game against an up tempo foe like Georgia, Oregon or upstart USC.
Ohio State was so busy knocking out QBs with their relentless greatness that Texas Tech, Cincinnati, Washington State, Indiana, Northwestern, San Jose State, Purdue, Illinois and Michigan all passed for 247 or more yards, prior to Miami's 304. Those were some fabulous halfback passes, obviously a flurry of them every game.
Ohio State would have won 8 out of 10 from Miami? Do you have a shred of comprehension how much of an adjustment that would require? There's a money line equivalent to claims like that, believe it or not. Teams that win 8 out of 10 can't be projected to win a string of close games. To be asserted to win 8 out of 10 you have to believe Ohio State warrants point spread favoritism equating to a 4/1 favorite. I realize the media never points out fundamentals like that, preferring talking head rambling idiocy. A 4/1 money line favorite aligns with an 11 point favorite in college football, which is almost exactly what Miami was favored by at game time (11.5). The money line was 4/1 in the Canes' favor. So you are comfy to adjust the rightful spread by 22.5 points. Well done. :rofl:
I bet Ohio State and thought the spread was inflated by several points. My estimate then and now is the Buckeyes would win 3 out of 10, which equates to Miami as roughly a 6 point favorite. IMO, if the teams played multiple times the spread would properly settle in that range.
Otherwise, Buckeye fans conveniently ignore the entirety of the game when posting a video of the controversial play. From the outset the referees had established that it would not be a tightly called game, notably in the secondary. Contact was allowed all night. The ABC crew and particularly radio announcing crew pointed it out repeatedly, including on 4th and 14 in OT when Gamble was not called for a blatant push off. The same referee who was closest to the decisive play did not call offensive interference on Gamble, and he was extremely consistent in not calling anything on Glenn Sharpe, Miami's freshman DB who covered Gamble on the controversial play.
Krenzel sat on his ass after that play, with dejected expression and head tilting downward, hardly begging for a call. He understood the way the game had been officiated. Terry Porter bailed him out and improperly rewrote history several seconds later.
BTW, normally when I dominate a head-to-head argument in a sportsbook it's worth at least 20 bucks, the pre-stated wager. Consider yourself fortunate. :)
|