|
At the beginning of the College Basketball season, maybe even before, the big name was O. J. Mayo. Mayo was supposed to be the best high school basketball players in the country. He decided to go to USC, but it seems that USC may not be having the best season. Once the college basketball season started the name many people starting saying was Michael Beasley, who goes to Kansas State. His team also may not be having the best season ever. Both USC and K-State are having winning season, but it is not guaranteed that either team will get into the NCAA tournament. I am not writing all this to criticize Mayo and Beasley, but to ask a question.
It seems that team with players who get less attention are having much better years. Last night both USC and K-State lost their games. However, Mayo and Beasley each scored more than 30 points. My major question is are Mayo and Beasley ball hogs who should pass the ball more, or are their teams just so bad to the point that Mayo and Beasley have to score so much.
In the bill up to last night's game of Kansas versus Kansas State most of what I heard was how great Beasley was. However, during the game, the second half of which I watched, Kansas outplayed K-State. Kansas won the game with a score of 88-74. However, Beasley scored 39 points. All the other players on the K-State team were in single digits. Does that show that the other players on the team are not that good, or does it show that the other players defer to Beasley, because he is the big name on the team, and that may hurt the team?
In terms of USC, Mayo scored 37 points, but his team lost to Arizona State 80-66. So I have the same question about the Trojans. Is it that the other players on the team are not that good, or is it that the players defer to Mayo, because he is the big name on the team, and that hurts the team?
|