Scurrilous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-16-08 07:03 PM
Original message |
trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-17-08 08:52 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Antoine Winfield was long overdue. |
|
Problem was, he hasn't ever gotten a lot of interceptions. He's just an excellent cover corner who tackles better than 99% of the players in the league. Not flashy, just reliable. His big plays this year (sack, strip, recovery, TD against Carolina, returned blocked FG for a TD on national TV against the Saints) probably made the difference.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-18-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Not getting a lot of ints can at times be a compliment, of course. |
hughee99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-17-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Congratulations to Brown alum and (relatively) local kid Sean Morey |
|
Making the pro-bowl for NFC special teams.
|
underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-19-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I am in no way a 'Skins fan but London Fletcher got ripped |
|
he has been all over the field all season. He kept them in several games with outstanding plays.
Matt Ryan should not only be in the Pro Bowl but should be at least the NFC MVP.
|
BulletproofLandshark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-21-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
The Skins have IIRC the 5th ranked defense in the NFL and didn't get any Pro Bowl invites, Yeah, I'm biased, but Fletcher, as well as Chris Horton, both deserved to be there. And I also agree with you on Matt Ryan.
|
DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-21-08 01:10 AM
Response to Original message |
|
is a glaring omission. He leads the league in passes defended despite getting very few opportunities. He's basically shut off half the field in most Giants games this year. Woodson and Samuel are there off reputation.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message |