Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why no penalty for "using a football as a prop"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 04:35 PM
Original message
Why no penalty for "using a football as a prop"
When Holmes did his LeBron chalk-throwing homage?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nickgutierrez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because it's a stupid rule.
There's no good reason to potentially turn a Super Bowl because of a stupid rule like that one. The league may fine him, but even that is a pretty silly step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BulletproofLandshark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. As long as the rule is in place it should be enforced.
Edited on Mon Feb-02-09 08:11 PM by BulletproofLandshark
It sets a bad precedent to abide by an entirely different set of rules for playoff football. Besides, the refs didn't have any problem with calling every other ticky-tack penalty during the game.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mduffy31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Hey
Rules is rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. I was wondering the same thing....
The way they called the game, I didn't think they would let that one slide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good point.
Although I recall some incidents of that during the regular season that weren't flagged, but a fine was levied after the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I know TO was flagged for using one as a pillow
and Ben Watson was flagged for sticking one under his jersey like a baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Jared Allen performed life support on one. :-)
No flag, but a big fine later that week. The NFL should really be consistent about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. Because the fucking NFL wanted the Steelers to win
A Cardinal doing the same thing would have been flagged and ejected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'm not sure about that
but there were a lot of calls (and non-calls) that could have gone either way, and a lot of them seemed to go the Steelers way. This wasn't a "borderline" call though. It was clearly a penalty and wasn't called. The refs can't argue that it wasn't a penalty, but they can claim that they didn't see it. Since the NFL has a policy specific to celebrations, you would have thought at least one of the refs would have had an eye on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSdemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. It was quick and I'm guessing the refs had no idea what he was doing
And if you've never seen the ad in question it just looks like he's shaking the football.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The announcers certainly didn't
one (Keyshawn Johnson?) thought he was pretending to shake Heinz (as in Field) ketchup out of a football "bottle"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. They were probably too busy reviewing the play to see it
The refs can't see everything. One thing I am sick of though is a bunch of whining, crying sore losers talking about the refs wanting Pittsburgh to win. If that were the case, the refs certainly wouldn't have put actual points on the board for Arizona with that holding call. Some people need to get a life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It was a hold...
but before that, I thought that Pittsburgh was going to take the safety on 4th down if it came to that anyway. With the safety, they could move the ball further down the field than they would on a punt, they wouldn't have to worry about screwing up the punt, and since they were up 6, Arizona was still going to need a TD.

Belichick did this a few years ago in a game against Dallas in the same situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You may be missing my point
If the refs were so in the bag for the Steelers, they would not have made that call. It makes people who keep saying that the refs handed Pittsburgh the win look ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I don't think they could ignore that one.
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 02:07 PM by hughee99
He tackled the guy (pulled him down while he was falling) in the endzone. I think quite a few of the calls that could have gone either way benefited the Steelers, but hey, that happens in every game. I don't think the refs outright blew any calls except for the endzone celebration, though that was pretty obvious to anyone at home since he did it right in front of the camera. In the end, both teams had their chances and the Steelers came up big while the Cards didn't.

I get your point about the whining, but other than that, I didn't see anything to whine about, and if that's the only real complaint, then it was a pretty well-officiated game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. NFL admits a penalty should have been called. They just didnt see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. Because the refs wanted the Steelers to win.
I have no problem with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC