Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Ed Reform Is Done

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU
 
teacher gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 11:05 PM
Original message
How Ed Reform Is Done
Edited on Fri Sep-25-09 11:23 PM by teacher gal
Cross-posted at GD


The following letter-to-the-editor, published in Education Week, is by Professor David Marshak of Seattle University.

Education Week
Published Online: August 31, 2009
Published in Print: September 2, 2009
LETTER
Common-Standards Process: Rigged From the Beginning?

To the Editor:

The national-standards-development timeline of the Council of Chief State School Officers, the National Governors Association, and Achieve Inc., a key player in the endeavor, is a dead giveaway to the closed, predetermined nature of the process ("Openness of Common- Standards Process at Issue," Aug. 12, 2009).

July 2009: Work groups are named.
July 2009: Three weeks later, draft college- and career-readiness standards are complete.
December 2009: The entire draft K-12 standards in language arts and math are complete.
January 2010: The standards are approved, and the effort to blackmail the states into signing on begins.

Anyone who has ever done curriculum- or standards-development work knows immediately that this timetable signals a process in which the end product has already been decided upon at the beginning.

This project is entirely closed off from educator and citizen engagement. And, as usual, there is not a single person on either development team who actually interacts with children or adolescents— just a bunch of directors, managers, and associates.

It is typical of the arrogance and stupidity of American educational policy development in our time that we have the policy developed exclusively by people who have no personal engagement with the institutions of schooling, people who are bureaucrats and paper- pushers and wouldn’t know how to engage a child if their ample salaries depended on it.

Of course, this is the logical conclusion of modernist consciousness, to which living wisdom is irrelevant. And this negation of wisdom is one of the key reasons that all of our modernist institutions are collapsing.

No doubt national standards and national tests will be shoved through, which will lead inevitably to ever-greater efforts to transform our schools from places with real educative purposes into test-prep factories.

David Marshak
Bellingham, Wash.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
teacher gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-25-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Something tells me I should stay off of DU
It starts with a "U".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jinto86 Donating Member (787 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. I know Iowa is a weird state...
What with us not even having state education standards until a year or two ago, but I had a professor who was also a high school english teacher (night class), who worked on the state standards. From the way she talked about it, it seemed like educators were making most of the decisions. I could be wrong about them making most the decisions... but then again... like I said before, Iowa is a weird state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. To clarify, this is how the current movement towards
national standards is being handled?

No educator input.

I wonder if they know, remember, or care, that, according to Marzano at least, the standards we currently have on the books would take kindergarten through grade 21 to effectively teach?

I'm sure, with a process that quick, they are cobbling stuff together from the 50 versions of state standards already out there. (?)

That's why education reform doesn't work, and why things keep getting worse. Educators are deliberately cut out of the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. 50 sets of standards and one way to hold us all accountable
Makes perfect sense! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-26-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Of course it does.
At least as much sense as every other mess politicians make of "reforming" public education. ;)

It's more efficient than having actual educators direct the reforms.


Isn't it? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm curious, do they have experts making these curricula?
I know the American Chemical Society is working hard to create national chemistry standards, and to my knowledge, they aren't shutting teachers out (because many teachers are members of ACS, who even has a yearly award for high school teachers).

A schedule that compressed for a government project is going to turn out garbage. Believe me, I work for a government contractor; it happens every damn day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC