Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Child Left Behind faces changes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:54 AM
Original message
No Child Left Behind faces changes

WASHINGTON -- Unable to push education fixes through Congress, the Bush administration is taking its own pen to the No Child Left Behind law.

The Education Department plans to make a host of changes to the education law through regulations being unveiled Tuesday, according to administration sources who spoke on condition of anonymity because the new rules had not yet been published.

Among the biggest changes will be a requirement that by the 2012-13 school year, all states must calculate their high school graduation rates in a uniform way.

...

Education Secretary Margaret Spellings has been taking steps in recent months to make changes from her perch. However, the proposed regulations amount to the most comprehensive set of administrative changes she has sought so far.

Washington Post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Will this nightmare still exist after W is gone?
I thought this was a summer job for Neil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Let's all hope not
Worst education disaster in this nations history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-22-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Only if the new Dem Prez does nothing about it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Of course it will still exist. It's a bipartisan nightmare,
with Ted Kennedy and George Miller working hard to keep it going.

It will be here until public ed is finally completely discredited and privatized, or until the public finally closes the door on the use of high-stakes testing as an accountability measure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. here you go
U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings Announces Proposed
Regulations to Strengthen No Child Left Behind
Focus on Improved Accountability and Transparency, Uniform and
Disaggregated Graduation Rates and Improved Parental Notification

FOR RELEASE:
April 22, 2008 Contact: Samara Yudof or Elissa Leonard
(202) 401-1576

U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings today announced proposed new regulations to strengthen and clarify No Child Left Behind (NCLB). The proposed regulations focus on improved accountability and transparency, uniform and disaggregated graduation rates and improved parental notification for Supplemental Education Services and public school choice. The Secretary made the announcement at the Detroit Economic Club in Detroit, Mich.

"I'm proposing new policy tools that will give families lifelines-and empower educators to create dramatic improvement," said Secretary Spellings. "Many are actions that have gained broad support through conversations on how to strengthen No Child Left Behind. While I will continue working with legislators to renew this law, I also realize that students and families and teachers and schools need help now. So, at the President's request, I'm moving forward to empower educators to take actions that families have been waiting for."

The Secretary noted that these new regulations build on NCLB's positive results and are consistent with the law's core principles of annual testing, publishing data and helping schools that fall behind. She added that in her travels to nearly two dozen states-which included meetings with governors, state school chiefs and state legislatures-discussions focused on how states and districts can improve struggling schools, more accurately measure dropout rates and chart student progress over time.

Several of the proposed regulations seek to clarify elements of the law that demand school systems be accountable for results and transparent in their reporting to parents and the public, including requiring that states publish data from the Nation's Report Card alongside data from their own tests for students. The Secretary emphasized that measures of student academic achievement may include multiple types of questions and multiple assessments within a subject area. In addition, a state's accountability system must ensure the inclusion of all sub-groups of students by adopting appropriate N-sizes.

Building on the Department's growth model pilot program, the proposed regulations would outline the criteria that States must meet in order to incorporate individual student progress into the State's definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Secretary Spellings is also proposing to strengthen the provisions of the law on school restructuring. Schools in restructuring need the most significant intervention, and a recent study found that 40 percent of schools in restructuring did not implement any of the restructuring options under the law. The proposed regulations will clarify that restructuring interventions must be more rigorous and that interventions must address the reasons for the school being in restructuring.

To continue the dialogue and address some of the more technical needs of the states and their departments of education, Secretary Spellings proposed the creation of a National Technical Advisory Council. The council will be made up of experts in the fields of education standards, accountability systems, statistics and psychometrics and be tasked with advising the Department on highly complex and technical issues and ensuring state standards and assessments are of the highest technical quality.

Noting that, according to a recent study, 75 percent of high school students in Detroit public schools do not graduate on time, Secretary Spellings announced the Department would build on the work of the National Governor's Association to establish a uniform graduate rate that shows how many incoming freshman in a given high school graduate within four years.

"Over their lifetimes, dropouts from the class of 2007 alone will cost our nation more than 300 billion dollars in lost wages, lost taxes and lost productivity," said Secretary Spellings. "Increasing graduation rates by just five percent, for male students alone, would save us nearly eight billion dollars each year in crime-related costs."

All states would use the same formula to calculate how many students graduate from high school on time and how many drop out. The data would then be made public so that educators and parents can compare how students of every race, background and income level are performing.

States will be allowed to use an interim calculation on a transitional basis, but every high school in every state will be required to report new graduation rates for accountability purposes no later than 2013. In the meantime, each state will be responsible for setting a graduation rate goal and for disaggregating data by subgroup to report and determine AYP. Beginning in the 2008-2009 academic year, in order to make AYP, a school or district would have to meet the graduation goal or demonstrate their continuous and substantial improvement from the prior year.

Additionally, the Secretary is proposing rules to ensure parents are notified in a clear and timely way about their public school choice and supplemental education service options. The proposed regulations will ensure that states make more information available to the public about what tutoring providers are available, how these providers are approved and monitored, and most importantly, how effective they are in helping students improve.

"Research has shown that effective tutoring programs can reduce the achievement gap by 10 to 15 percent," said Secretary Spellings. "The problem is, these options will not make a difference if parents don't know they're available. I hope these proposed regulations will assist parents in getting the extra help their children may need to succeed."

The regulations proposed by the Secretary are published online in today's Federal Register for public comment. Hard copies of the Federal Register will be available on Wednesday, April 23.

For further information on how the regulations will strengthen NCLB, including a link to the Federal Register, please visit http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/reg/proposal/.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Education is mostly local yet the Bush administration's
Leave No Child Behind is a failure. Schools complain they have to pay for too many tests. They have to teach to them and can't get much else done.

Who profits off the tests? A Bush boy of-course.

NCLB should be discontined. It is a bad way to do eduction. If children are to "succeed" in our society they need to have parents at home who can help them and participate in their education programs. With two jobs and high divorce rates how can this happen? Lack of good jobs and security in our society make our families less effective and successful. This is reflected in our children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Education Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC