Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just how gay IS Judge Roberts?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 04:27 PM
Original message
Just how gay IS Judge Roberts?
1) Judge John Roberts did pro-bono work for gay rights

Roberts Helped Block Colorado's Anti-Gay Measure
http://www.nysun.com/article/18115

---


2) Worked as a lobbyist for the cosmetics industry (and lied about it).

Roberts Failed to Disclose Lobbyist Work
http://www.freep.com/news/nw/roberts5e_20050805.htm

Roberts omits stint with cosmetics group
http://tinyurl.com/cvl7b

---

3) Adopted two children under possibly questionable circumstances. Lots of gay men do that, you know. S

NY Times Confirms Roberts Adoption Inquiry
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/8/4/225949.shtml

Closet liberals
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/d50a3dce-0489-11da-a775-00000e2511c8.html

---


4) Have you seen how he dresses his kids? Pastel Liederhosen?

Judge John Roberts’ 1950s Family
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/11409

Photos:
http://tinyurl.com/drcyt
http://tinyurl.com/9kpcg

---

5) Roberts' wife is a feminist.

Nominee's Wife Is A Feminist After Her Own Heart
http://tinyurl.com/7u7qc

I married a feminist
http://tinyurl.com/c6zom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. blackmailability (e.g. closeted homosexuality) is a serious concern
Edited on Fri Aug-05-05 04:34 PM by wli
The question should be raised in a more serious context.

ON EDIT: If he's got a secret, e.g. is a closet case, he needs to either come out of the closet or get out of the business of public policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian_Expat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. This is the same logic that gave us anti-gays-in-the-military. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. no, it's not. It's the closet that's the issue, not gayness.
i.e. come out of the closet or FOAD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Define "feminist."
She's a feminist against abortion. Sounds like a front group for Republican women who are so kidding themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Protected daughter of privilege
who never had to fight for anything. Young women have no idea what it was like growing up in the '50s and '60s. You had three choices, teaching, nursing or secretarial work. Realizing in college in the early '60s that I really did not want to teach, I thought about switching my major from music education to music business and did not because it would have been too shocking. My parents would have been furious because what in the world would a woman do with a business degree. I could not let them down by pursuing such a frivolous route. Of course, nowadays, no one would think a thing about it if a woman got a business degree.

I'll never forget our Catholic neighbor who gave her husband six babies in nearly as many of years while working HIS way through medical school at some menial job. -- Can you imagine? And as soon as he was finished with his education, he divorced her leaving her with the children. I've never figured out how anyone could do that. Ah the good old days when men were men and women were . . . . well, . . . . "protected."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I knew a girl who put her husband thru law school.
The day he passed the bar he made up divorce papers and brought them home for her to sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. How sick.
Lawyers have to pass a so-called character examination, at least in California, but, of course, it doesn't mean much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. It happened in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh puh-leeeeez! You've seen his haircut ...
... strictly "Great Clips" with nary a sign of mousse abuse! It's like sooooooo 1988 that Roberts could never be confused with a gay man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Options Remain Donating Member (475 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I would fall over dead laughing.
if Bush forces him in and three weeks later he comes out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. WTF?
"Adopted two children under possibly questionable circumstances. Lots of gay men do that, you know."

Do what,exactly? Adopt children, or adopt children under questionable circumstances?

These generalizations are really stunning. So what if the guy did like other men? He's not advertizing the fact if he does, which is what gets people all flipped out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sorry, that sentence was un-clear. I didn't mean gays adopt questionably
Edited on Fri Aug-05-05 05:29 PM by IanDB1
I should be more clear.

Also, the entire post was meant tongue-in-cheek anyway.

Anyway, welcome to DU.

If you'd been here longer, you probably would have had a better idea of the context in which I'd meant that post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Peace
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SocialJustice18 Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Please spare me
I know this guy is a conservative and how much it would hurt us in the long run if indeed he is voted into the Supreme Court. Should we really question the guy's sexuality just because he helped our fellow comrades in a case? Or that he worked on a case for cosmetics? We have no right to question his sexuality on the basis of adopting children. At least the children aren't in foster care right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC