Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What exactly is lgbtq?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
Green_Lantern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:56 AM
Original message
What exactly is lgbtq?
As opposed to lgbt? Someone used the term lgbtq on a show I was watching last night and I was confused by the way it was used.

I know it means lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, and questioning but the person using it was presented as being offended by lgbt(leaving out the q).

Any thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. LgbtIq
I is for our intersexed kin and q is for queer and questing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought the Q was for queer
because some self identify as such
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. They missed out the "I"
Intersexuals. I always thought the "Q" was for self-identifying "Queers", people who don't fit into the other labels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm still trying to figure out when GLBT became LGBT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Because the latter sounds more like a sandwich! Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I've been in a few of those kind of sandwiches, I'll tell ya that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Depends on who's writing it down, really.
I see both here on DU. GLBT and LBGT. Looking at the profile of the writer generally explains the choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I personally use both - but I think the LGBT became more popular in the last few years for a couple
reasons. Mostly - and I may get flamed for this - but women are the backbone of our movement. Women are the ones that are there in both leadership and dedication. I think there are more elected lesbians than gay men (thats certainly the truth in So CA). Im sure others have experienced the opposite too - but that has been my experience since coming out 15 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Some People Are a Bit Obsessive About Inclusiveness
GLBT has always been more than enough of a mouthful for me. As long as we respect our intersexed allies and continue to fight for their rights as much as our own, I don't find it necessary to slap an I on to GLBT. As for the Q...well, no one's ever been able satisfactorily define it. If you're not gay, or bisexual, exactly what are you? What is "queer" supposed to mean? And "questioning" is neither a sexual orientation nor a gender identity. Whenever I see a Q at the end of GLBT, it always makes me roll my eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes. I've always been in favor of excluding people who are over-inclusive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Touche!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smashcut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. I always thought Q was for "questioning"
I guess it could also stand for "queer" (as many are saying here) which can be an alternative to identifying as gay...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwearshoesinky Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's easier if we accept that there's three spectrums.
There's your improved scales of attraction started by Kinsey much much improved which demonstrate that the vast majority of people are somewhere in between exclusive opposite attraction and exclusive same attraction. Folks can also be outside of this if they have little or no attraction to anyone or have other priorities in life.

Second spectrum is gender which is of course a societal construction. There's a range between encompassing "masculine" and "feminine" traits at least how they are understood in the present. These expectations for gender do change dependent on time and geography. In Western society though, you have these poles and then a range of people in between based on self identification or how they are placed based on society's norms. In this you have people who are transgendered who are transitioning between genders or you also have gender queer folks who reject the label of gender and step outside of this spectrum similar to how asexual people are outside of the attraction spectrum.

Lastly, even biological sex is a spectrum. You have male XY and female XX as well as a range of chromosomal variations which we know as Intersex such as XXY, XXXY, etc. Also, there is a large range of ambiguity in live births that aren't even based on chromosomes but other factors in vitro.

I think that having an expansive alphabet is necessary because people like to be able to compartmentalize and have solid definitions. However, the truth is that there is a wide range of variation that requires more effort and energy to define to the lay person on the street. It's easier to say, I'm like you but I like my gender or sex than I like men but red headed women are also the bees knees so on a scale of 0 (being exclusive heterosexual) and 6 (exclusive same-sex attraction) I'm a 1.5. Of course for the vast majority of the population in the middle there can be variation based on time, experience vs. fantasy, or ease of identification when explaining sexuality to other people such as saying I'm gay when really you're a 5 on a sexuality scale.

Can of worms, it scares people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meldread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. I remember an older debate about GLBT vs LGBT.
Basically, during that time GLBT was more commonly used and the argument centered over the fact that some lesbians were angered that the G came before the L. Since that time I've always written it as LGBT, in part to avoid being offensive / causing an argument, and in part because I didn't (and still don't) give a damn if the G or the L comes first. :P

Frankly, I find it silly to keep adding letters. Pretty soon, we might as well start with A and end with Z.

I'm all for inclusiveness, but at some point the acronym becomes difficult to use and remember. I'm at the point where I'm ready to stop using it all together and just use "Queer" as a universal term. Queer would signify anyone who is different, odd, and that is either not accepted by the mainstream or identifies with such individuals. That makes it a universal word that can be adopted by the movement to extend not only to LGBT people, but any other person that might identify with us and our cause be they gay, straight, or just a little bit strange - so long as they accept other people who are not accepted - then welcome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC