davidinalameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-18-10 07:17 PM
Original message |
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-18-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Calling people names has always been a highly effective way to get them to change their minds |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-18-10 08:05 PM by slackmaster
And their votes.
Cursing too. It really wins people over to your views, and gets them to respect your maturity!
|
davidinalameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-18-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. so you think that we can win over bigots |
|
anyway, sometime you just have to send out a big old Fuck You to people you don't like or don't like you whatever the case may be
so...
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-18-10 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. No, but there are people in the middle who can be won, or lost |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-18-10 11:57 PM by slackmaster
Think about it.
The sophomoric "Proposition H8" meme contributed to the victory of Proposition 8 by alienating people who were on the fence. You can't win a close campaign with that kind of amateurish tactic.
I personally know two people who changed their position on Prop. 8 from a weak No on libertarian grounds, to a strong Yes because someone vandalized businesses in their neighborhood by tearing down Yes on 8 materials, spray-painting "No on H8!" on buildings, and breaking a few windows.
One of the businesses they vandalized was a bike shop that's very popular in the area. A few thoughtless acts are sometimes all that's needed to lose an important battle.
You may not be able to win over a bigot, but calling someone a bigot serves only to reinforce their prejudice.
|
JackBeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-18-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. The people you speak of will never change their minds. |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-18-10 11:33 PM by JackBeck
There does exist a moveable middle, but I can guarantee you this video is not addressing them.
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-18-10 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. The video poses a risk of alienating some in the critical movable middle |
|
A shift of just 2% of the voters in California would have defeated Proposition 8. The margin is that close in a lot of places.
I hate seeing a good cause torpedoed by a bunch of amateurs at the helm.
|
JackBeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-18-10 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. The Task Force has been on the ground since Prop 8 passed winning over the movable middle. |
|
You give way too much power to this video if you think it will somehow be the deciding factor in how people will feel about civil marriage equality in CA.
|
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-18-10 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. I won't be sending links to the video out to anyone |
|
Because the issue is too important to risk alienating a single voter.
|
JackBeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-19-10 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. And that, of course, is a choice you're allowed to make. |
|
I'm not here trying to convince you either way, but I wouldn't give too much legitimacy to a random internet video making the rounds years before a referendum to repeal Prop 8 has even gathered enough (any?) signatures, while a legal case has been winding its way through the courts.
But again, the groundwork being executed by The Task Force is significant, since more people can relate to face to face contact by LGBTQ Californians, and will probably remember those conversation if a vote ever comes up again, rather than some anachronistic web video.
|
davidinalameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-19-10 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message |