Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military Recruiters Met With Protests Over Anti-Gay Policy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 09:55 AM
Original message
Military Recruiters Met With Protests Over Anti-Gay Policy
http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/10/100405military.htm

Military recruiters have been met with demonstrators on two campuses as students protest 'don't ask, don't tell' the Pentagon's ban on gays serving openly in the armed forces.

At Stanford in Stanford, California, and the University of Iowa in Iowa City, students decried the Solomon Amendment, a law which allows the federal government to withhold funding to universities which deny the military access to students.

Twenty-four law schools went to court last year to fight the law, arguing that the military ban on gays serving openly violated the schools' policies on equal rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. this is a tough call
obviously, the school has a right to bar anyone they want that doesn't meet their code of standards, from recruiting on campus. I put this in the same vein as a Law Firm that won't interview women, or a Consulting Firm that won't hire Jews. Both should be banned, and if the school feels that a certain employer, say the US military, does not want to interview candidates, based on some qualification banned by the school, then they shoudn't be there.

on the other hand, I would not want the school to take money from that law firm or consulting firm either.

So I propose a compromise. Since the military has different employment standards that the rest of the federal government, which it does, and a different personell scheme, you can reasonably state that the military is a different, and discrete employer than the civilian workforce of the Government. So there are two different pots of money in play here, the Military money (of which there is a lot for R&D, especially, and other government money (health research, etc.) If a school takes money from the military, they must allow military recruiters on campus. no question. If a school takes other, non-military money from the government, they can ban the section of the government that actively discriminates from recruiting on campus, but still allow say, the CDC, or the Social Security Administration. that applies to all parts of the School, sorry Harvard Law, but the physics department takes military money, you cannot ban recruiters from campus.

but that would never work, would it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC