Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH Staff Refuse to Include Gay Military Family Representatives at Military Families Event

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 12:56 PM
Original message
WH Staff Refuse to Include Gay Military Family Representatives at Military Families Event
This is a major slap in the face - this is not an event on military property and many of the family representative invited are not even involved in the military.

http://www.taylormarsh.com/2011/04/12/wh-staff-refuse-to-include-gay-military-family-representatives-at-military-families-event/

From Servicemembers United, a statement issued today “on the White House’s refusal to allow a civilian representative of gay and lesbian military families to be present at First Lady Michelle Obama’s and Dr. Jill Biden’s ‘Military Families Initiative’ kick-off event at the White House.” SU’s Ex. Director, Alexander Nicholson, said:

“It is rather unfortunate that both East Wing and West Wing staff have refused to allow a representative of gay military families to even be in the room at an event that is supposed to honor their commitment and sacrifice. We have been trying for nearly two weeks to get just one spot for one of our community’s representatives at this event. The First Lady’s office has used the continued enforcement of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ as an excuse to exclude us, even though they know that ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ does not apply to the civilians who work at their advocacy and service organizations. Many straight organizational representatives have been invited to this event, including some with few or no military families in their constituencies. Yet our thousands of gay military families are shut out from being represented today because of nothing but lingering political homophobia. Gay and lesbian military families should not have to fight this hard just to stand in the back of the room in 2011.”

The repeal of DADT process will be completed fairly soon, and at that point, I suppose future events, and the programs the “Military Families Initiative” will provide, will include gay, lesbian and bisexual families (transgender individuals and families are not included in regard to DADT repeal). Discharges under DADT have slowly decreased over the last several months, and even the Marines had to acknowledge in a recent congressional hearing that, in fact, the training was going well. The dire predictions that currently serving heterosexual men and women would stampede to civilian life haven’t come about. They wouldn’t have anyway, in my opinion, but the current job situation would certainly be a discouragement to leaving the military.
The “Military Families Initiative” seems like a very good thing, especially given the multiple deployments, and no real end in sight of that changing.

Interestingly, and something I’ve not seen mentioned in most of the LGBT source stories about this whole thing, the initiative that is getting so much WH attention will be overseen by Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the guy who was relieved from command in Afghanistan after the Rolling Stone interview in which senior civilian leaders were disparaged. The NYTimes posits: “The appointment of General McChrystal, who commanded elite Special Operations units before taking over the mission in Afghanistan, can be seen as an effort to mend any perception of a civilian-military breach following his forced retirement.” ( http://tinyurl.com/65rbfpp )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. But...but...but...the easter egg roll!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Lily Ledbetter! Lily Ledbetter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. But Michelle has pretty arms
Isn't that enough for you people? After all, it's only been two years. Puppy . . . puppy . .. look at the cute puppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Will donnie boy be there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. But his hands are tied by DADT, Dontcha know that?
Michelle can't risk breaking the law by honoring former military members and their families, because we all know DADT covers servicemen and women for life.


Won't SOMEONE think of President Obama's Reelection campaign????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'd hate to see the First Lady taken away in cuffs by MPs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Karlson Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why does this news not disappoint me?
I distinctly remember a time when I could be disppointed by Barack Obama and his entourage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC