Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Mexico school bans all clubs after gay-straight alliance forms

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
The Philosopher Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 02:03 PM
Original message
New Mexico school bans all clubs after gay-straight alliance forms
from Pink News

A school board in New Mexico has voted to ban all school clubs after a gay-straight alliance applied for recognition.

Officials on the Clovis school board said the ban was a coincidence but the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) questioned the timing.

The alliance was approved by the principal last month who apparently did not realise that the district superintendent must approve new clubs.

District superintendent Terry Myers told the Albuquerque Journal that the gay-straight alliance’s application did not trigger the ban.

...

Micah McCoy, of the ACLU of New Mexico, told Reuters: “This sort of tactic has been used in the past by school districts to discourage gay-straight clubs from forming. A lot of alarm bells went off when we saw this.”

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2011/04/28/new-mexico-school-bans-all-clubs-after-gay-straight-alliance-forms/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Pinknews+%28Pink+News%29">Click Here To Read More


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Officials on the Clovis school board said the ban was a coincidence"

And the Clovis school board has some swampland they'd like to sell us.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yeah - great role models for kids, huh?
Not only are they bigots, but they are obvious liars too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billy Burnett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pathetic. 2011 and still in the dark ages.
:mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. A coincidence? Ya right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louslobbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sure, why would "Officials" on the Clovis school board lie? This was just a coincidence, nothing to
see here folks, move along now with your day. Approving a "new" club, especially if it is a club with the name "gay" in it, would never trigger a ban, I mean, where has that ever happened before? No "officials" of a school board would ever be homophobic after all, aren't many members of these school boards Christians? And Christians are loving and caring and good. They care for the homeless and poor and help the suffering. This couldn't have been a tactic to discourage gay-straight clubs from forming, that is just unthinkable in this wonderful, loving, accepting and tolerant America.......Total Sarcasm as if you didn't know. Go ahead school boards and faculty, keep hate and division in our schools alive and well New Mexico, teach your young people to hate others not like them and watch the continued destruction of this country.
Lou
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. I am curious just how wide the impact is going to be and the rationale given
Does it impact sports teams like football and baseball? What about the Debate and Chess teams (assuming they have them)? Was the reason cited cost, liability or something else? The article does not say and I am quite curious what possible explanation they would have for such blatant discrimination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. No on sports
and probably no on debate and chess though that would vary by district. Sports teams are offical extra curriculars and not clubs. The debate and chess might well be clubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Any clue to the official rationale in this case?
I really want to see what reason they could possible cite and it not be discriminatory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I would bet they are willing to say they are discriminating
I think they probably can do it. It is an all or nothing deal though. Either you let all clubs in or you let no clubs in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. The comeback will have to be from the other groups that are now canceled
Edited on Thu Apr-28-11 06:01 PM by ProgressiveProfessor
If the board remains resolute, there will be a anti Gay/anti GSA backlash blaming them for the loss of the Chess, Debate, and other groups. Seen it before.

Still looking for the reasoning to cancel all clubs...it will have to be a real doozie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I am not sure they will have to give one
I could be wrong since NM has at least some form of lgbt protections but I think that if they close all clubs, no matter what reason they use to do so, they can skate federally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. If it was a board action, I would expect a public vote and some discussion
If the superintendent did it on his own, perhaps not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I meant legally
I am presuming that the community agrees with them on this, or at least they think the community does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. They should immediately form a club that meets after school.
Since the ban apparently applies only to clubs meeting during school hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thanks_imjustlurking Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. ? Why would clubs meet during school hours anyway?
Edited on Fri Apr-29-11 07:31 PM by thanks_imjustlurking
School hours are for school. Guess I better go read the link in the OP.....

The school board voted to ban any extra-curricular school group from using school premises during school hours. The ban also means that groups cannot use school resources.


I understand the first sentence, and am surprised they're just getting around to that - I would have thought it would go without saying.

Does the second sentence mean a club can't use a classroom to meet *after* school? The whole thing seems screwy to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Philosopher Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Schools are different from each other
But at the one I went to, we had a 20 minute period for everyone that they could use for different reasons, from catching up on homework, to tutoring, to group meetings. This was early in the day for us, so it was during school hours, not an after-school thing.

I assume if the school reported here didn't have time like the above for clubs, they'd still withhold support because after school meetings would still have to be approved by the school and it would be on school property. The school would be forcing everyone to meet on their own time and resources and not everyone can meet that. During school hours, or right after school, gives everyone the best chance to be a part of a club or activity.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thanks_imjustlurking Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Ah, I see.
I have never been a student at or worked at a school that has an activity period such as you describe. If such exists, it certainly should be open to everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Philosopher Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. There's always the option
to also meet during lunch. I went to a small school, so a bunch of us were able to leave the cafeteria and go sit with a teacher in their office and have a nice talk. If we had been more enterprising, I don't know why we couldn't have spent that time doing a club activity. Of course, I imagine larger schools (or even schools for these kids nowadays) treat lunch time like a lock down. You are where you need to be and nowhere else, so this might be a little hard. But I would enjoy it, because that's what I experienced when I was in high school.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetiredTrotskyite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. I Swear, These People Would Rather Forbid EVERY Club...
rather than let GLBT kids and straight kids have a place to build bridges. I suspect the really hateful ones know that there will be students who will hassle the GLBT kids, blaming them for the loss of their clubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. We often live in "The Age of Stupidity." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC