Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Methodist Bishops Protest Ruling in Exclusion of a Gay Congregant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 12:47 PM
Original message
Methodist Bishops Protest Ruling in Exclusion of a Gay Congregant
A recent decision by the highest court of the United Methodist Church to reinstate a pastor suspended for barring a gay man from his congregation has touched off widespread alarm within the denomination and prompted the Council of Bishops, the church's elected leadership, to issue a unanimous rebuttal.

Like other mainline denominations, the United Methodist Church, the country's third-largest denomination, has been struggling with the role of gay men and lesbians in the pews and in the pulpit. The church has traditionally welcomed gay people, though it does not ordain "self-avowed practicing homosexuals.".

On Monday, the Church's Judicial Council, its equivalent of the Supreme Court, ruled that the Rev. Edward Johnson had rightfully used his pastoral discretion in refusing to accept an openly gay man as a member of his church in South Hill, Va.

Many Methodists had expected an outcry over the decision from liberal congregations clustered mainly in the Northeast and the West Coast. But Methodists all over the country, including those from historically conservative regions, have voiced alarm at the decision, lay and clergy members said. Stephen Drachler, a church spokesman, said that its headquarters in Nashville had received about 400 e-mail messages on the issue and that the Council of Bishops had received about 200. About two-thirds of the messages opposed the ruling, Mr. Drachler said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/05/national/05methodists.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am glad to see this
I was honestly much more upset at this decision than the one defrocking the minister. Gays would have to feel unwelcome after that decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC