Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

N.C. Couple Refuse To Pay Taxes To Protest Gay Marriage Ban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 01:08 PM
Original message
N.C. Couple Refuse To Pay Taxes To Protest Gay Marriage Ban
http://www.365gay.com/Newscon06/01/013006taxProtest.htm

A Hendersonville, North Carolina same-sex couple is refusing to pay Federal and North Carolina Income Tax to protest the refusal of both levels of government to recognize them as a couple.

Merrill, a 71-year-old artist and gay activist says the protest will involve about million dollars worth of stock sales and income.

"I have no intention of paying Federal and State Income taxes because my same sex partner and I cannot be legally married and receive the same tax benefits as other married couples," Merrill said in a statement on Monday.

The IRS says it is legally bound by the Federal Defense of Marriage Act to treat same-sex partners as single. North Carolina also has a DOMA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. OUTSTANDING
Gays should start dumping the tea into harbors coast to coast. Equal protection under the constitution my ass.

GO MERRILL!!! (I'd make the letters bigger but I don't know how.)

Now lets have a constitutional amendment banning divorce. What God loving "christian" would object??

Who the fuck on this planet can define marriage to other human beings? "Christians" with hearts full of hate?


GO MERRILL, GO MERRILL, GO MERRILL .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoshWatermanMN Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have thought about this for some time
We need to have a nationwide, organized effort of civil disobedience to make this point stick. I will be happy to participate myself (I am in MN, as you can guess from my screen name. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. good for them.
I hope they at least escrow what they would have paid as a legally married couple so they're not taken apart by failing the good faith test.

However, at 70, open an account in Lichtenstein, transfer it to a Cayman Islands offshore limited partnership, and drop it into a CIBC third party double signature business account and reinvest in the U.S. as a foreign entity.

If you want to do it legally there are actually a number of ways to thumb your nose at the IRS and state tax authority, provided you're willing to move your money and assets.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. My partner and I own a business together - since we can't take the
marraige deductions, we simply rely on the business ones. Everytime we go out to eat, unlike a married couple, the gov't has decided that we are business partners for that meal (and we always talk about something at work). Any trips are strictly business research since, in the gov'ts eyes, we're only business partners. And so on. They really would make more money from us by recognizing our relationship the same as they do Billy-Bob & Mary-Sue down the road who managed to get knocked up in 10th grade and had to get married to keep from embarrasing their families (who all completely overlooked her 7 month's along bulging belly under that white wedding dress) Since they live with her folks during the week to go to school, then his folks on the weekend - it could get interesting if they get claimed as Married Filing Joint and Dependent at one house and Dependent at the other house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is great
and I hope it spreads. As others have noted, it needs to be an organized process with millions participating.

This type of thing needs to be our "Rosa Parks" moment. Although not paying taxes is not going to have the media appeal of refusing to give up a seat on a bus.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. alll-riiight!
way to go!
:applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. No taxation without representation!
If you pay taxes like everyone else, you should get the same rights as everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC