Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boy George slams gay marriage sham

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:17 PM
Original message
Boy George slams gay marriage sham
Former CULTURE CLUB star BOY GEORGE has ridiculed same-sex 'weddings', insisting marriage is an outdated institution that has no place in modern or gay culture.

The KARMA CHAMELEON hitmaker was amazed by SIR ELTON JOHN and DAVID FURNISH's decision to have a civil ceremony on 21 December last year (05) - the first day British laws permitted the unions.

And he predicts many gay 'marriages' are destined for the divorce courts.

He says, "Gay unions, what is that all about? I haven't been invited to any ceremonies and I wouldn't go anyway. The idea that gay people have to mimic what obviously doesn't work for straight people anymore, I think is a bit tragic.

http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/boy%20george%20slams%20gay%20marriage%20sham_20_02_2006

Hmmmm ... I wonder why Boy doesn't get invited to any gay weddings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boy George is a joke
he has no idea what others want or need. He often opens his mouth when he knows nothing - which is a shame - I love his voice just not his thoughts:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. he doesn't get invited because the hosts
are probably afraid that the police will show up to arrest the little druggie

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Hahahaha
No one invited her!She's too modern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. "you're gonna miss me blind" - not if you don't go away nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. to be very honest part of me agrees with him
which is not to say that i dont think we should have the right to get married ..

but some people like the radical queer identity...i see his point... though i think gay people should have the right to decide whether to go the radical queer route or the married-in-suburbia route...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. some of us do both
When the time came to settle down, I jumped at the oportunity. that was in 77
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. women owning their bodies and legally extending gay folk
Edited on Wed Feb-22-06 08:32 AM by xchrom
the same rights and privileges of straight folk are both extremely radical paradigms.

one can still live the radical queer life -- but changing society to see gay folk as equal in all things is huge step towards liberating straight folk as well as gay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. again to re-iterate i really want us to have equal rights
i just happen to understand where he is coming from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. i just think b.g. has a misunderstanding what a
radical paradigm acutally is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Marriage works for many, straight and gay.
Just because marriage doesn't work for all straight people doesn't mean it should be denied to gay people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. he's partially right
as an institution it's a little ridiculous to conceive that "marriage" in its rigid traditional form is the "foundation" of a successful society or should continue to be thought of that way when what we mean is that contractual animal husbandry is the foundation of a successful society.

But we are a sentimental people and we like ceremony and process and those things reinforce commitment between two adults, so as a social tradition for cementing unions, the process of marriage, from engagement to death is very important, however it evolves.

It's also important legally, because in this country the accident of blood kinship overrides any other form of social bond, except marriage. That means that without a legal definition that grants "kinship", everyone who is not married or blood bond is considered a legal stranger and taxed and treated accordingly.

Boy George, you might take a civics lesson in your spare time to re-connect to reality on the street.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Siyahamba Donating Member (890 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. If you don't like them, don't have them.
But don't stand in the way of others who want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Reckless, reckless.
Don't people like Boy George realize that making negative comments about gay marriage only provides right wing fundamentalist christian extremists like Bush, Robertson and the Traditional Family Coalition ( :puke: ) even more easy ammo to argue that gay people should not be allowed to marry or enter into a domestic partnership??? :wtf:

I can just hear Bush and other right wing wackos now: "...even Boy George predicts many gay marriages are destined for the divorce court, so why should we allow gays to marry???!!!! Besides I have more important things to do like invade another sovereign country."

You know, Boy George has every right to speak his feelings, but he should be more sensitive and think about the potential consequences.

Maybe I'm misinterpreting this, but I feel we have enough trouble as it is fighting for basic civil rights.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Blow me Miss George.
Miss Thang needs to worry more about keeping her nose out of the coke and before she sticks it in other people's relationships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well he doesn't speak for me!
And when I marry Sapph, I am not mimicking anything straights do. What I am doing is committing my life and love to only her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
16. Well. Maybe -- just maybe -- "Boy George" hasn't absorbed the
bald-faced fact that marriage is about rights. Rights in law. Rights that are denied to GLBTs. "Boy George" may be dancing to another tune, since he apparently accepts second-class citizenship. It makes for news though, correct? It got his name in the newspaper, correct? How sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
17. Well, I suppose for an embittered queen like Boy George...
who apparently isn't in a relationship. Or, if he is, doesn't care about partnership benefits and the benefits that come from marriage/civil unions...fine, whatever.

But there are scores of us who do care about these things. And about not being treated as second-class citizens.

Opinion noted, Boy. And now we'll be fighting for our rights. Go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC