Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

3/4 Page Antigay Ad in today's Denver Post

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 08:48 AM
Original message
3/4 Page Antigay Ad in today's Denver Post
"Why Doesn't Senator Salazar Believe Every Child Needs a Mother and a Father?"

Anyone else see these today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. does it say who paid for the advertising?
naturally it doesn't mention that all those children won't ever get a parent -- let alone a ''mom and dad''.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Here's a pic of the ad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Family Action... what a bigoted bunch of MFos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. ah yes -- focus on the family!
co-creators of the fictioonal war on christians.

tapeworms sucking cat piss is what they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wonder how many single parents are going to find that ad insulting
Sure, as a single dad, I recognized that it would have been easier to have their mom around, but given her personality and mental condition - they wouldn't have necessarily been better off.

Even taking away the gay bashing of the ad, as a single dad, I still find it offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. what we really need to know is
what percent of adoption applications do we make up?

Is it 10 - 15% or more? Hard numbers, either way, would be something to beat them over the head with.

It's such a non-issue, especially in a metro/urban area. I think the reason lawmakers are pulling back from it generally speaking is that we do make up a significant number of adoptions and they can't justify keeping these kids in state custody when there are parents of any kind who are willing and qualified to adopt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good question
I tried searching around to find this number, but haven't had any luck so far.

I think you're right - defending state custody (esp. with all the bad press THAT'S been getting recently - here in CO a woman was just arrested for keeping her 11-yr-old foster son in a dog cage!) is getting harder to do, when there are good homes for them to be placed in permanently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. this is a Focus on the Family production . . .
Edited on Wed May-31-06 10:33 AM by OneBlueSky
James C. Dobson, founder and CEO . . .

http://www.family.org/cforum/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainbowreflect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. That basic ad has been on the radio here in Nebraska.
Against Chuck Hagel. The first time I heard it I about :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ironically, the banner ad on this page right now . . .
. . . is for Faith Bible Chapel - the local antigay cesspool here in Denver. :puke: is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustFiveMoreMinutes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. '.. needs at least one or more Mother and Father'
With today's divorce rate and remarriage, MANY kids have 'two dads', or 'two moms' (or more of course). We have the biological parent and then another or more of the step-kind of parent. It's not unusual today for ANY Heather to have 'two moms'.

And let's take the ad to the other extreme... EVERY kid needs a mom&dad.. so let's..

* Force widlowed parents to remarry immediately.
* Outlaw orphanages
* Not allow parents to enlist/serve in the military
* Require state approval for divorce

or else I guess NO politician really believes EVERY child needs a mother and father!

ANd note, how cute and freckled and white the poster child is.

Do you think Focus on the (white) Family would ever put up a black, hispanic, mixed race child on a poster?
Maybe they need to put an * by Child and in the footnote say 'white anglosaxon protestant, we dont really care
about urban, non-whites'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. "...meanwhile homosexual marriages are threatening to spread
across the country..."

RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!! :puke:

Where's the ad talking about the hypocritical christians and their high divorce rates and broken families??

Yes, it's quite the outrage having children grow up with two loving same sex parents. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I guess divorce doesn't impact the "sanctity" of marriage.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. I have NEVER understood why WE don't run ads that say:
Why does James Dobson and Focus on the Family think that adult fathers should bathe with their sons and show them their peepees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
15. So I take it that Family Action
supports a law forbidding divorce? I suppose it would also be prudent in the event of the death of one spouse to require the widow(er) to remarry immediately, so the child(ren) does not go without the all important other parent for any significant length of time. It doesn't matter if there is adultery, spousal abuse or child abuse/neglect--so long as the child(ren) have that crucial father and mother. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. As a child I used to cry myself to sleep
wishing my parents WOULD divorce. These people have no clue what it is really like for kids to grow up in a household of one male and one female married parents who hate each other, fight all the time, etc., etc. Happiness for me as a child was when neither of them were home at the same time. Hear that, Mr. Dobson, et. al? Yes, my parents stayed married for the rest of their lives (good christians) and went for the last 10 years of their lives not talking to each other, living in the same house. When Dad died, my Mom said to me, "Thank God. Now I can finally find some peace." Sacred, holy, sacrament of marriage?

But I can contrast my childhood with the cousin's. He was raised by his Mom and her Partner, openly back in the 1960s. Absolutely no comparison to the peaceful, loving home he had. It did not matter the gender of his parents. They loved each other and they loved him. It truly showed in the kind of home life he had. I would have gladly given my right eye to be able to run away and live with them.

It really all comes down to LOVE.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. Did Senator Salazar vote for the Iraq war?
If every child needs a mother and a father, then why... since the dawn of time... have we sent so many fathers off to war?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC