Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A question that has always puzzled me concerning marriage...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 08:41 PM
Original message
A question that has always puzzled me concerning marriage...
Let's assume for the sake of argument that the Supreme Court in Washington State rules that gays be allowed to be issued marriage licenses and I go the next day and have get one and have it witnessed and notarized and submitted.

What happens if the legislature turns around and decides to change the constitution in the state?

Do I stay married or can the legislature legally dissolve my marriage contract?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. I say you are married.
But I am not a fascist neocon closet-case homophobe judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, I certainly "feel" married, regardless.
After 16 years of being together, I can't imagine being without my true love and lifepartner and to me, that is what marriage is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. As an ordaned Pagan priest...
...I'd be happy to marry you any time you like.

To hades with the government's opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. There would probably be a provision in the newer bill
that would address the status of marriages conducted and authorized under the auspices of the previous bill. No doubt that provision would be void those marriages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaltrucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't know about the legalities
But my personal view is HELL YES gay marriage should
be legal. Then you'd be as miserable as the rest of us!

Just kidding. Keep up the fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Honestly. I give up. I can tell you that most of the actrivists are on yo
your side but it's not enough. We'll see. What you can do is make it obvius about phone banks. Make it obvious that's it's an issue..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Minor point, Washington State's constitution can only be amended by the
people.

QUOTE
ARTICLE XXIII
AMENDMENTS

SECTION 1 HOW MADE.
Any amendment or amendments to this Constitution may be proposed in either branch of the legislature; and if the same shall be agreed to by two-thirds of the members elected to each of the two houses, such proposed amendment or amendments shall be entered on their journals, with the ayes and noes thereon, and be submitted to the qualified electors of the state for their approval, at the next general election; and if the people approve and ratify such amendment or amendments, by a majority of the electors voting thereon, the same shall become part of this Constitution, and proclamation thereof shall be made by the governor: Provided, That if more than one amendment be submitted, they shall be submitted in such a manner that the people may vote for or against such amendments separately. The legislature shall also cause notice of the amendments that are to be submitted to the people to be published at least four times during the four weeks next preceding the election in every legal newspaper in the state: Provided, That failure of any newspaper to publish this notice shall not be interpreted as affecting the outcome of the election.
UNQUOTE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. The legislature can *not* dissolve your marriage
However, they could certainly propose an amendment that, if approved by the voters of Washington State, would prohibit the recognition of same sex marriages. That would put you and your partner in the odd position of having a perfectly legal marriage that no one is allowed to recognize as valid. That, in turn, would doubtless merit consideration by the United States Supreme Court, which I expect the Legislature would be desperate to avoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC