I hate the psychopath,control freak,elitist,bully humans,I said there are exceptions to my hatred for humans before.I said there are good people out there ok?
I also said I didn't literally think I was a cat.You missed that one too, I see. Seems you'd rather believe I think I am, literally feline so you can feel superior or something by calling me crazy. you are using selective perception about what I am saying here because you are fucking defensive.
I said all this in my posts before. but you obviously ignored that point because it didn't fit in with the false image you and other hostile people are trying to fit me into.
My feline identity thing(and the body mods I am working on) comes from the same motives,it feels the same way INSIDE me.It actually has to do with feeling complete, making my body match my spirit,which is a "normal" process for a trans-gender person to struggle with, including this queer male androgyny feline..
And every trans-person sufferers because they need their inside self to match their outside body to feel comfortable in their own skin to be complete.My feliness is like my transgendered, it is my path to self wholeness,you are degrading and calling 'crazy'. And no you can't try to tell me how I feel by saying how is my feline identity so different than my trans identity when both struggles for me have to do with matching up my spirit inside my body to the body outside to create a sense of wholeness?? IT ISN'T ANY DIFFERENT.That's my truth.
Some GBLT's apparently are bigots about body mods,and some think body mod is only a fetish,for some it might be, but for me it is as valid and important to me being whole as getting my male chest reconstruction done .That is what you seem to not get.
What this all boils down to is this is about empowerment,power,and the right to identity and a person's the path to finding completeness.
Some gay guys will never be complete faking a hetero life with a woman .So to be complete he has to admit he is gay,and find a man to love.
Likewise a transgender to be complete has to understand what being trans means choose if s/he needs to go through body modifications like gender surgeries and/or hormones ,Going until the trans-person has found a comfortable state of mind and completion... So You must admit an aspect of being GBLT is about self determination, as in YOUR and MY right to have an identity of our own be honest to it,and for it to be reflected in the way we are?
Or is this all a club of a few (gay,bi,lesbians and trans-genders only) acceptable types of people fighting to be called'normal' by the powers that be and nothing more?
You and other hostile snarky people here do not get the point I am making about self identity,freedom and completion and how vital it is.So to call someones path to completion (body mods)crazy or not valid is very stigmatizing,and in the past these sorts of slurs were aimed at gays and still are..And trans-people like it or not ARE body mods, they modify their body outside to match who they are inside,to feel complete.Like I do and am doing but,with a feline twist..
Instead you have made the other point I wasn't even intending to make very clear, that when people make an identity that is out of the mainstream to feel complete and if it gets politicized, the in group basically becomes an exclusionary body,a limit and anyone else,trans or not who may try to expand the definition, or relate other things of what self can be to it,the questioner will get marginalized because of the desire to be more diverse and accepting than the status quo can handle or accept...And some gay people apparently haven't learned how to step out of kissing up to the concept the lie called normalcy yet,desperate to be seen as normal by the holders of power in this pathological society.
Some haven't really grown past the colonialist mindset in the way of reacting and excluding certain people from being included in the fight for self determination identity and being who they are . I am part of GBLT because I am trans, Bi (the excluded parts of me are the asexual,and feline) And while people get that understanding for the need to be complete and whole, but if a person adds in an element that makes some in the in group feel"creepy" they go ape-shit and start splitting hairs as if their entire movement would lose power if it dared expand the focus to understand what the search for self completion might entail .That's what the culturally dominating groups that tell everyone else who to be or not be want people to NOT have,completion,happiness. That is why being gay,,a feline,body mods,and trans issues are an issue at all in this world.It has to do with self empowerment.
I am asking where does sexual preferences end and the topic of self- identity begin. Where does identity begin and end,and why are some identities ok and others not, can you tell or do you rely on consensus or some other person to tell you?
What is normal? Why do people insist on being "normal? And ever wonder whom is defining it for everyone else?
Where does desire come from,why are some desires called crazy when ones that seem pretty unpleasant or intolerable to me,are called normal? Who decides which of these things is acceptable and sees it fit to impose it on others in an unofficial way,what are they protecting ? And why do people follow it? What are they scared of?
I guess you never ASKED those questions.
Is it a dread of losing power,voice, status and acceptance from the dominator class the ones who use norms to keep everyone too scared of who they are to stop covering it up..? So why do GBLT after all we have been through in fighting to be gay identified and not harmed act like a exclusive dominating class to the various scapegoats within our own if they think they've grown past it?
These limits are going to become more problematic in the GBLT community ,if you seek liberation under the auspices of the dominator class's blessings.
I guess my topic was too deep for you to comprehend because the furriness is all you could see.Sad. Still refused to relate because maybe some people are in denial about how important having a right to form an honest self- identity,and the denial of this plays into the culture of power and powerlessness within issues and the political and social power structures.
Fur identity (not the fetishists)challenge people to accept they are not all that special or divine among the animals in this planet we all share as much as our culture's engineers want us to believe and behave.To some being equated with animals upsets their ego.
But some sociologists are asking why are animals seen as less than people?...Why can't GBLT's ask these things about animal/human identities too?
Leslie Irvine
University of Colorado at Boulder, USA
The question of animal selves: Implications for sociological knowledge and practice
The question of whether sociologists should investigate the subjective experience of non-human others arises regularly in discussions of research on animals. Recent criticism of this research agenda as speculative and therefore unproductive is examined and found wanting. Ample evidence indicates that animals have the capacity to see themselves as objects, which meets sociological criteria for self hood. Resistance to this possibility highlights the discipline's entrenched anthropocentric rather than lack of evidence. Sociological study of the moral status of animals, based on the presence of the self, is warranted because our treatment of animals is connected with numerous "mainstream" sociological issues. As knowledge has brought other forms of oppression to light, it has also helped to challenge and transform oppressive conditions. Consequently, sociologists have an obligation to challenge species-ism as part of a larger system of oppression.
http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume6/abstracts.php