|
I just emailed this to newspaper, we'll see if it gets published. the second half is in regards to a proposed rezoning of an old church on one of the busiest corners so it can be torn down and turned into a standard video store.
"To the readers of The Fulton Valley News- After reading the editorial "Support majority American opinion" on the American Family Association's boycott of McDonald's, I mused whether to write a response or not. The whole thought seemed preposterous and begged some comment, but I hardly like McDonald's either, so could hardly encourage anyone to run out and buy a Big Mac. Instead, I suggest that readers on both sides of the issue navigate to the web address "http://www.hrc.org/issues/workplace/cei.htm", which is the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index page. The Human Rights Campaign is a civil rights group which focuses on rights for gays and lesbians, and the index grades corporations likewise. While for supporters of equality, reading the index will not be troublesome at all, for opponents, you will have to remember to read the index upside-down, inside-out and backwards. But then again, some of you seem to read everything in that fashion. In regards to the proposed rezoning of the old Congregation Church, I currently oppose it, but do not oppose rezoning the site altogether. What would be great to see would be what is called "adaptive reuse", where an older building, instead of being plowed down and the site used for yet another boring box store, is instead repaired, rezoned, and reused. Imagine if that proposed video store were put inside the current building. It would be very noticeable and a town landmark. Imagine if it were a coffee and book shop, or any other sort of retail or service in that building. The roof only recently had a great deal of work done, with widespread community involvement in raising funds. I cannot believe, that with the recent work done, the remaining repairs would cost any more than the cost of tearing down and building a plain old box store. At the very least, the cost to the community would be incalculable. -thanks for reading, ********** *****, former resident who hopes to come home to stay."
|