Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some areas of S.F. voted to ban same-sex marriage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:00 AM
Original message
Some areas of S.F. voted to ban same-sex marriage


Heather Knight, Chronicle Staff Writer
Friday, November 14, 2008

For all the talk of San Francisco values, a Chronicle analysis of how the city voted on the state's same-sex marriage ban shows a city geographically divided on the issue - and voting trends that turn San Francisco's typical political spectrum on its head.

One in 4 San Franciscans voted in favor of Proposition 8, far fewer than the 52 percent who voted to ban same-sex marriage statewide. But a closer look shows race, age and education influenced voters more than anything else - even among those living in one of the world's most gay-friendly cities.

Voters in 54 of San Francisco's 580 precincts supported the ban, with a high of 65 percent of voters favoring it in parts of Chinatown and downtown. More than half of voters in large swaths of Bayview-Hunters Point, Visitacion Valley, the Excelsior and areas around Lake Merced also voted to ban same-sex marriage.

Neighborhoods including the Marina, Laurel Heights and Mission Bay - which almost always vote more conservatively than neighborhoods such as Bayview and Chinatown - voted overwhelmingly against Prop. 8.

"With the racial and religious overprint that we're seeing, the standard San Francisco politics get thrown out the window on this one," said political consultant David Latterman, who further crunched the precinct-by-precinct voting results that The Chronicle obtained this week from the Department of Elections.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/11/13/MNIQ144185.DTL&type=politics&tsp=1



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well now there's a big shocker for you
San Francisco has a diversity of age, race, religion, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, education level, and political opinion.

Who woulda thunk it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamahaingttta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not surprising...
There were even a few people in the Castro who voted Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yea, it's the equivalent of Jews supporting the Nazi Party.
Probably a bunch of those dumb ass Log Cabin homos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamahaingttta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Or maybe just some old ladies...
..who don't like their neighbors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's eye-opening to me to realize that a lot of supposed "gay supporters" aren't.
If a majority of voters supported Prop 8 in California, imagine how many voters would do so in North Carolina! In Florida, even with its famous "gay-friendly" communities, 63% of voters stripped the rights of gay people to get married or have civil unions.

I don't know the figures in Arkansas and Arizona, but I can imagine.

That guy who owns the ice cream store in Sacramento attended gay pride events. Most of his gay customers probably assumed he wasn't a bigot. I'm sure he smiled and was friendly. But he contributed $20,000 to take away marriage rights from every gay person in his state. Not much of a friend.

It's very discouraging to know that in my day-to-day life there are probably lots of "nice" people who never say anything rude to me, but would deny my rights in a heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. That's why out reach as the answer
or the main answer is just bull sh*t.

If out reach were the answer Dick Cheney would have come out for justice for all people long ago.

And Newt Gingrich.

The worst are the crypto bigots - like the ice cream shop owner. He is so busted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I agree.
Blaming gay people for not being nice enough to people taking away our rights is like blaming the victim of domestic violence for not being a good enough partner. It's just the excuse that the abuser uses to justify his or her behavior.

"You made me hit you because you're always running your mouth!"

"If dinner had been on the table on time I wouldn't have lost my temper - this is your fault."

"Shut up or I'll hit you again."

"If you just tried to get to know people better they wouldn't vote to take away your rights."

"If you're going to be rude I'll stop supporting your rights."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I'm sick to death
of this notion that we have to suck up to bigots and beg them to please, please, please give us our rights. If we stop being so...gay..will you give us a few crumbs? Maybe if I dress in a suit (or a floral print dress and heels for women) and pretend I'm straight will you give me my rights pretty please Mr. Bigot?

They haven't the authority to withhold them from us in the first place. We shouldn't be reduced to groveling at their feet like dogs to get them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ahhh, my city
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 11:29 AM by gaspee
I lived in San Francisco from '90 until 00 -- anyone who has lived there or knows San Francisco could probably have predicted which precincts voted yes.

I think people forget sometimes just how expensive San Francisco is to live in. There are a lot more conservative voters In SF than people who don't know The City would expect there to be.

But money conservatism had nothing to do with this vote. Or am I not supposed to mention that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Seniors. There are a bunch of residence hotels in the purple areas
by Market and by Columbus. Not sure about Visitation Valley. I think there are a lot of older voters in that Sea Cliff dot, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC