Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"DOCTORS are HELPING HASTEN the DEATHS of sick CHILDREN" Euthanasia!?!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
theearthisround Donating Member (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 04:29 PM
Original message
"DOCTORS are HELPING HASTEN the DEATHS of sick CHILDREN" Euthanasia!?!
http://www.informationliberation.com/index.php?id=1001

CHICAGO - Researchers in the Netherlands, the first country to legalize euthanasia for terminally ill people, have found that doctors are helping hasten the deaths of sick children in a variety of ways, sometimes at the edges of what the law allows.

......
The new study looked at 64 deaths of ill children during a four-month period. Of those, 42 cases involved medical decisions that could hasten death.

Doctors were given immunity against prosecution and their responses were kept anonymous in the government-sponsored study.

The decisions ranged from withholding life support, a practice accepted in the United States, to administering drugs such as morphine with the intention of ending suffering and hurrying death.

Only one case involved euthanasia in its strictest definition: doctor-assisted death at the patient's request.

(more)
http://www.informationliberation.com/index.php?id=1001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. if they're terminally ill and suffering......
why not? It's the kindest thing to do. You don't let your pets suffer needlessly, why should you let people live in agony for no good reason?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. We're not mere animals
If euthanasia were legalized, the Bushies would have us all put down just for opposing his criminal regime. Be careful what you wish for; you just might get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Bush will just let us all die
in the next storm.

Or starve to death.

Or heck, just shoot us.

He doesn't need to hide behind euthanasia.

Euthanasia - for the right reasons at the right time - is a GOOD thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Many patients in the USA already get sufficient morphia ....
To relieve their suffering when there is absolutely no hope for extending their lives. When a cure or even meaningful survival are out of the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MockSwede Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Mere animals
We ARE just animals. No more special than other animals, intrinsically.

I could do the same study in the US and show that we're doing the same thing here. It's not common and it's not unreasonable.

It's called compassion and each case is different and each minor patient and his/her parents is different in their dire situations.

Whereas, you'll have to shoot me before I shut up about that shit-for-brains, fascist *&^% regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, legal for some time
and compassionate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Giving a child who is dying of cancer a dose of morphine that will relieve
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 04:45 PM by kath
pain and anxiety, but which also might suppress respiratory drive, is not a bad thing to do - it is merciful.
<on edit - I'm referring to situations which are clearly end-stage - where death is imminent and is going to occur within the next day or two.>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vektor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. I am all for assisted suicide, euthanasia, etc.
Try working in an ICU. It gives you a whole new perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. What if people want to live, even with pain?

Many of us don't want to be "put down" like animals.

Most people are scared of the pain they've been conditioned to believe comes with dying, but not all deaths are painful. And drugs can control pain for most patients, if the doctors aren't doing the "Now you don't want to get addicted" routine."

I've had ten or twelve surgeries myself so I can assure you that post-surgical pain can be extreme. But no one argues we should kill post-surgical patients to ease their pain. We give them drugs, although the drugs don't entirely stop the pain.

Find the right drug to ease the particular terminal patient's pain and keep them comfortable until death occurs naturally. The dying have things to resolve in their minds and the process shouldn't be cut short.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. No one is talking FORCED
euthanasia - but

- those of us who don't want to suffer needlessly

- nor have our loved ones suffer needlessly through prolonged death agony
- nor waste valuable resources (bed space, medical attention/ supplies, our families' $$)

should be allowed the OPTION of euthanasia if we want it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I don't think anyone is talking about doing it against people's will.
If they are, then I agree with you that it's completely wrong.

In this case, they are mostly talking about ending treatment when it has become hopeless, and giving sufficient morphine to relieve pain, even if the sufficient dose may also depress respiration and hasten death by a few hours. They generally don't do those things without the consent of the patient. If you don't want morphine, they won't give it to you.

The difference with the pain from your surgery is that you knew that it would eventually get better. If you were in the same degree of pain and knew that it would only get worse, and that your death was imminent, you might have a different attitude towards it. At any rate, I don't believe anyone would be in favor of taking away your choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MockSwede Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. ICU tour
I think everyone should be required to sit in an ICU or CCU or CSU for one solid week. And then decide how they or their relatives should be treated.

50% of our healthcare dollars are spent in the last 3 days of life. Heroics that cannot change the outcome. We just cannot get out of the mindset to 'just do something!" And forget the cost - the human toll in suffering exceeds the money, too.

I'm opting for the 'horse with a broken leg' route. Just shoot me when I think I'm pertty well gone with no good hope of fully functional living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. If you think doctors aren't doing this here in the US
you're fooling yourself.

Neonatal ICU nurses are even given instructions not to respond to a code when it's a seriously disabled baby, to let them die.

It's just not out in the open here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. One of my nursing instructers said that years ago
she witnessed a case where a Down's Syndrome baby was deliberately placed in a room with a baby that had some very serious and contagious illness. The obvious intention was for the baby to contract the illness and be taken off of society's hands. I believe this took place decades ago.

Let's not kid ourselves that we used to honor the sanctity of life back in "the good old days".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC