|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 08:40 PM Original message |
Neurologica: Mercury Excretion in Infants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
1. Great article! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeanruss (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 09:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. more junk science |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 09:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. So you believe the shills peddling chelation therapy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeanruss (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. no mercury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Of course the rate of serious adverse reactions to Gardasil... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:30 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. WOW! You sure changed the subject fast! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 11:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
92. Studies in the med. lit. have documented the mechanisms of vaccines/mercury causing autism -documen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:44 AM Response to Reply #92 |
101. same bogus links over and over and over and over and over ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 12:09 AM Response to Reply #11 |
95. Vaccine induces Demyelination & Autoimmunity a documented cause of autism- detailed doc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 12:35 AM Response to Reply #95 |
99. I know that issues of citations are completely lost on you, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Do you have ANY links or cites WHATSOEVER... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I think you've been dealing with Mr. Cites a bit too much lately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 11:14 PM Response to Reply #16 |
88. That study poorly done/bogus documented by peer-reviewed studies in post 83, 85 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 11:19 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Additional support by the tests and experience of treatment clinics and the ARI parent survey of tho |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 11:44 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. For Christ's Sake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 12:02 AM Response to Reply #91 |
94. Documented mechanism by which mercury/thimerosl causes schizophrenic behavior in autism/schizophreni |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 12:31 AM Response to Reply #94 |
97. Like I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 09:13 AM Response to Reply #94 |
106. This is what you call a peer reviewed study?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:47 AM Response to Reply #88 |
102. Your sources stink. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #102 |
120. You are wrong; anyone can check that my sources are peer-reviewed and have not been discredited by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #120 |
121. I checked your links-- they are bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 02:16 PM Response to Reply #121 |
122. I don't know what links you are talking about, but I cited hundreds of peer-reviewed studies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 02:18 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. I picked six links that you cited. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #123 |
150. Just not true as anyone who follows the trail can see. All statements and references are accurate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 09:51 AM Response to Reply #150 |
151. Who will believe your fake lab report for Mrs. Sample Patient |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 02:18 PM Response to Reply #102 |
124. Large independent survey finds link between Autism and ADHD with vaccination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chicagomd (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 04:00 PM Response to Reply #124 |
141. Another step into the hole for philb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 12:24 AM Response to Reply #5 |
96. The huge Autism Association/ARI survey of thousands of parents is clear documentation; plus ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 12:37 AM Response to Reply #96 |
100. Bernie! A SURVEY IS NOT SOUND EPIDEMOLOGICAL EVIDENCE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:52 AM Response to Reply #96 |
103. Autism Association is NOT a reliable source. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 12:36 AM Response to Reply #103 |
115. The best evidence the antivax hysterics could possibly present |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 04:41 AM Response to Reply #115 |
116. Public policy? Breakthroughs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Sweet, delicious irony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. It is just easier to ignore facts that don't fit. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Yeah, but these facts were in the damn abstract. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I didn't have any trouble, but then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 11:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
90. You've supplied not a single valid study, all have been demonstrated poorly done, wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:59 AM Response to Reply #90 |
104. Don't need to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 11:42 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. the study |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 12:07 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. From the OP: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 12:24 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I don't think you can reach that conclusion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 12:30 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. But the data doesn't exactly warrant that conclusion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 12:43 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. nothing about any of this is conclusive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 12:45 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Also, note that there is a smaller N... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:46 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. a "lot" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:37 PM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Like I wrote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:33 PM Response to Reply #33 |
75. well if it isn't a lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:34 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. That's why the study's authors discussed the need for follow-up research |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #77 |
81. I understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 10:38 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. That's pretty much the exact opposite conclusion that the scientists came to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #82 |
93. No credible studies support your claims; thats been clearly demonstrated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 12:31 AM Response to Reply #93 |
98. I'm not claiming anything, Bernie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:17 AM Response to Reply #19 |
25. "If mercury is no longer in the blood, where is that mercury coming from?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 11:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
86. More peer-reviewed study documentation and thousands of clinical cases at post 83, 85 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. I took 5 minutes to look up the name of the first scientist listed in this study....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. So your perceived conflict of interest means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Only if the conflict of interest involves big pharma. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
27. No.... no.... but it is a MONSTROUS conflict of interest. The man obviously wants.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:28 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Are you saying that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:36 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. They have cause to because of whom he works for. That's why conflicts of interest are bad..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:39 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. But you admit that there is no evidence of wrongdoing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:41 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. No, how could I say there's no evidence of wrongdoing? I haven't investigated it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. But conflict of interest does not mean that the data is corrupt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:48 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. The manufacturer of the product in question performed his own study. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:59 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. The American Academy of Pediatrics didn't have a problem with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:04 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. The American Academy of Pediatrics is made up of doctors who have had no trouble throughout |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:05 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Ha! They're *all* in on the conspiracy, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:10 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. Nonononono. My nephew is a doctor. Doctors are like everyone..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:13 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Way to change the subject. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:16 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. Soooooooooooooooooooooooo.... what is your tremendous interest in defending this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:29 PM Response to Reply #68 |
73. Way to change the subject again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:17 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. Broad brush smears are sooooo FUN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. That would be an ad hominem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
28. The links are ad hominems? Is it an ad hominem that he admits he's hired by Thimerosal producers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lizerdbits (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Attacking the person instead of the data/argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:34 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Did I? I didn't say, "Dr. so and so is ugly and stupid", I said, "Dr so and so admitted he worked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lizerdbits (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:42 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. I believe that's what that poster meant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:44 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. No, it qualifies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:46 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. I said there's a conflict of interest. It's the manufacturer testing his own product. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lizerdbits (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:55 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. What's the problem with the data or conclusions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:58 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. That the manufacturer has reasons to play with the results so he doesn't lose money on Thimerosal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:59 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. But that doesn't mean that they did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:02 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. It's illogical to TRUST any pharmaceutical company to run their own tests on their own already- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:04 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Thimerosal is neither threatened nor troubled by the science |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:07 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. Oh really? Well, I've been watching the articles that came out BEFORE Eli Stone, and afterwards.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:09 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:14 PM Response to Reply #59 |
66. Well? What part do you play in all this? :-) You've peaked my interest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lizerdbits (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:25 PM Response to Reply #66 |
71. How am I defending it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:30 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. It is all about the people, not about the study |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:33 PM Response to Reply #66 |
76. Does merely pointing out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lizerdbits (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:06 PM Response to Reply #44 |
55. So what's the problem with the conclusions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:43 PM Response to Reply #28 |
37. An ad hominem argument is where you attack the person presenting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:46 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. The manufacturer ran these studies for his own product.. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 08:58 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. There is, of course, a major difference between... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Oh yeah? What's the difference? That in one the CEO himself lies.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:02 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Do you actually have any evidence whatsoever of any wrong-doing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:06 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Yes. You mean, as in having to be arrested? I don't know. Are scientists who sell themselves out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:07 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Oh, you do? Please then, share it with the class. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:11 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. Share what? What exactly are you talking about? And by the way.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:15 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. Forget what we were just talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:18 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. But there's something even more interesting..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:39 PM Response to Reply #70 |
78. I would say the more interesting thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 10:09 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Mr. Kool-Aid, you ask me to trust, but I'm very non-trusting, particularly of studies performed by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. I'm not asking you to trust. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:51 PM Response to Reply #80 |
107. And I'm saying that the probability that this dude was honest in his science is really low nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. And I'm saying you have not even come close to proving your case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. There is no case. A test performed by someone who has a bad reputation, is no test at all nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 11:07 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. The validity of the test depends on your opinion of the tester? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 07:52 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. What if I performed a test? How valid would it be? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 12:51 AM Response to Reply #109 |
111. And you know nothing of the research... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. As long as it's the pharmaceutical company in question that is financing he test, it should be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-07-08 09:06 PM Response to Reply #113 |
114. So you say. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lizerdbits (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:08 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Where's my beemer?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:11 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. Don't you remember at the last Merckenary conference... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. Oh now you're trying to make me seem like I said *ALL* scientists sell themselves to corporations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lizerdbits (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:14 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. No just being humorous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 09:26 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. Humour is lost on this one. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #58 |
137. Peer-reviewed doc. showing clear causality in post 125 and 127, and not discredited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #137 |
138. philb debunked right here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lizerdbits (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. Thanks for posting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-04-08 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
13. Utterly demolishes what little semblance of an "argument" the anti-vax loonies had. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
83. Another poorly done study by researchers not familair with mercury effects and the med. literature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 10:51 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. You're citing parents' subjective ratings of improvement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 11:03 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. I cited peer-reviewed studies that clearly indicate this study is poorly done/bogus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-05-08 11:11 PM Response to Reply #85 |
87. You're changing the subject. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 09:06 AM Response to Reply #83 |
105. Same bogus shit over and over and over and over and over... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 06:09 AM Response to Reply #105 |
117. Its you who can't back up any of your claims; never cite any valid studies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-08-08 08:21 AM Response to Reply #117 |
118. No, it's you who never cites any VALID studies, Bernie/BernieJr. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 02:21 PM Response to Reply #105 |
125. Autoimmune Autism Linked to Thimerosal and Aluminum in Vaccines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 02:24 PM Response to Reply #125 |
126. You need to be familiar with these definitions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #126 |
129. We're very familiar with chemistry and the scientific method; seems that's more than for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #129 |
130. Your behavior is unhealthy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #105 |
127. Another causal mechanism of vaccine/metal caused neurological damage seen in autistic children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #127 |
128. Same link, same obsession, same compulsion, get help. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #128 |
131. Again you have't shown anything, and we know by now you apparently can't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #131 |
132. You were caught red handed using a fake lab report. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #132 |
133. What are you talking about? You are not talking about me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #133 |
134. I caught you red handed--a smoking gun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. Not true; your saying so doesn't make it so; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. You're dodging because I caught you using fake documentation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #136 |
139. Absolutely not true. As I said, I have never deliberately tried to mislead anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #139 |
140. BUSTED!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #140 |
142. I assume this is the same thing as I just explained in the previous post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #142 |
143. You posted six bogus links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 06:02 PM Response to Reply #140 |
144. Your post has no links so I have no clue what you are talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 06:05 PM Response to Reply #144 |
145. The links are yours, and they are BOGUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 06:54 PM Response to Reply #145 |
146. I looked; none of the links are bogus; some of the Gov't agency links have changed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 07:59 PM Response to Reply #146 |
147. You can not justify this fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:20 PM Response to Reply #147 |
148. It does support my postion; the report has the DD reference Hg level for with and w/o amalgam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #148 |
149. LOL! philb=fraud LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
119. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC