Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Tiny Bit of Cancer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 06:31 AM
Original message
A Tiny Bit of Cancer
With a Tiny Bit of Cancer, Debate on How to Proceed

In a cancer patient, lymph nodes are the closest thing to a crystal ball. Gaze into them after removing a tumor. The presence of malignant cells may be a sign that the cancer will recur, leading to more tests and intensive treatment.

As biopsies of the lymph nodes grow more sophisticated and sensitive, oncologists and patients face the unsettling question of what to do with a little bit of cancer. It has become a familiar debate, especially for breast cancer, with no clear answer in sight.

“We can pick up things that we could never pick up before,” said Dr. Minetta Liu, an oncologist at the Georgetown University Medical Center. “But do we need to pick them up?”

Without more data to guide them, doctors worry that some women may be given test results that are actually too good, leading to more medical attention than necessary.

NY Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Looking at Molly Ivins and Elizabeth Edwards
I'd say there's no such thing as test results that are too good unless you're not all that interested in finding something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie4629 Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't know how true this is, but
I read once that in every person, including healthy people, cancer cells develop daily, perhaps several times a day, and our immune systems destroy them because that's what it is there to do. It is only when an immune system is weakened that the cancer cells are allowed to grow and spread and overwhelm the immune system.

Considering that cancer treatments are so highly toxic, that they weaken the immune system, and that they are often carcinogenic themselves, maybe it is better to take a "watchful waiting approach" if there are only a few cancer cells, to give the immune system a chance to destroy them.

I say this as a person who is a 22-year cancer survivor. I had chemotherapy and radiation, and am well aware of the long-term side effects of treatment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. My oncologist thinks that most cancers are environmental
And his key word is "most"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC