Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Low vitamin D levels appear common in healthy children

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:12 AM
Original message
Low vitamin D levels appear common in healthy children
http://www.physorg.com/news131644498.html

Many healthy infants and toddlers may have low levels of vitamin D, and about one-third of those appear to have some evidence of reduced bone mineral content on X-rays, according to a report in the June issue of Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.

Reports of a resurgence of vitamin D deficiency and rickets, the resulting bone-weakening disease, have emerged in several states, according to background information in the article. Vitamin D deficiency also appears to be high in other countries, including Greece, China, Canada and England.

Catherine M. Gordon, M.D., M.Sc., and colleagues at Children's Hospital Boston, studied 380 healthy children ages 8 months to 24 months who visited a primary care center for a physical examination between 2005 and 2007. Parents filled out a questionnaire regarding their nutritional intake and that of their children, and also reported on the use of vitamin D and other supplements, time spent outdoors, socioeconomic status and education level.

Among the 365 children for whom blood samples were available, 12.1 percent (44) had vitamin D deficiency, defined as 20 nanograms per milliliter of blood or less, and 40 percent (146) had levels below the accepted optimal level of 30 nanograms per milliliter. Breastfed infants who did not receive vitamin D and toddlers who drank less milk were at higher risk of deficiency (for each cup of milk toddlers drank per day, blood vitamin D level increased by 2.9 nanograms per milliliter).

Forty children of the 44 with vitamin D deficiency underwent X-rays of the wrist and knee. Thirteen (32.5 percent) had evidence of bone mineral loss, and three (7.5 percent) exhibited changes to their bones suggestive of rickets.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. And in the "olden" days it wasn't a problem because children played outside
in the sun. Parents would do well to take their kids outside and let them run in the sunshine, it's good for their little bodies in innumerable ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Off course make sure they have no. 100 sun block and ten gallon hats, long sleeve shirts
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 07:29 AM by Mountainman
and pants and gloves. Don't want any of those nasty UV rays to touch their skin. Oh forget it, just give them a video game in the basement to play with.

Damned if you do, damned of you don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't have skin cancer and I was raised in the desert before the days
of sun block. In fact as teenagers we used baby oil to get a deeper tan. :wow: (I'm lucky, I didn't get skin cancer, I know)

I have heard that the most dangerous rays are between 10 am to 4 pm. Anytime before or after is supposed to be a safer time to be out sans sunscreen. 15 minutes a day running outside ought to take care of this "epidemic."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. My wife grew up in a nudist family and none of them have skin cancer
I met her at our club 22 years ago and I don't have skin cancer but some members do have it. I think it is not a 100% thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. probably wouldn't help in the Pacific Northwest n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm pretty sure you're right. The poor kids would be wet all the time and still deficient.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC