Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Philadelphia Inquirer: Elizabeth Edwards calls health-care system immoral

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:56 AM
Original message
The Philadelphia Inquirer: Elizabeth Edwards calls health-care system immoral
Elizabeth Edwards calls health-care system immoral
By Melissa Dribben
Inquirer Staff Writer


Speaking knowledgeably and with dollops of relaxed good humor, Edwards told the audience of 200 people at the National Constitution Center that the current health-care system is immoral and "fails everyone except the extremely wealthy."

***

Except for one subtle remark about the "Republican vice presidential candidate's" opposition to stem cell research, Edwards maintained a relatively neutral political stance. Neither presidential candidate is proposing the kind of universal and comprehensive coverage that Americans deserve, she said. But of the two, Edwards said, Democratic Sen. Barack Obama's plan, which would mandate coverage for children, will move the nation more in the right direction.

Republican Sen. John McCain, she said, "wants to take away the tax incentive for employers to provide insurance." Such a move, she said, would drastically increase the number of uninsured and dramatically drive up health-care costs.

***

Edwards noted that McCain has enjoyed terrific health-care benefits as a member of the nation's military under what is essentially the kind of single-payer system that so many fear.

McCain's four melanomas, however, constitute the kind of pre-existing condition that usually disqualifies people from private insurance, she said.

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/world_us/20080917_Elizabeth_Edwards_calls_health-care_system_immoral.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Happy to be the First Rec!
Way to go Elizabeth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. She made some excellent points.
I just wish they could have left out the dirt for once. WTF does her husband's affair have to do with this issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. It's a shame, but otherwise it becomes the elephant in the room
Sadly, whenever most people think of this fiercely courageous and keenly intelligent woman these days, they find it difficult to completely blot out thoughts of that scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. True.
Many qualified candidates will never run for office if they have a skeleton in their closet, or even if they don't. Few will choose to subject themselves and their families to this kind of trauma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. My paper is still on the front walk.
I guess I'd better get off my tush and read this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I wish I still lived in Pennsylvania.
I would kill to have a newspaper worth reading delivered to my doorstep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. well I wouldn't call the system immoral, lacking in a lot of area's yes
but they were able to get her foot out of john's ass, so they can't be all bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes, the system is immoral
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 09:29 AM by RufusTFirefly
I agree with Elizabeth Edwards.

For the richest country in the world to let people suffer and die needlessly is immoral. There's no getting around it. Furthermore, the fact that this suffering and dying is actually making other people wealthy only compounds the immorality.

And I fail to understand the relevance of your other comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think it is a bad idea to cover children for health care
they might get used to it. Then when it is taken away as an adult they won't know what to do.
No, I think it is better if a child has to buy an individual policy immediately after birth. I'd allow the child to remain on their parent's plan for a week. After that they must be on their own policy. Better that they learn when they are young.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah, suck it up, kiddies.
If you can't manage to stay healthy on your own, why should the government step in and save your pathetic little lives?

They have more important things to bail out, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. so good to see someone else here with a normal perspective
none of that goody two shoes for me. No siree. If a kid can't take care of themselves, then as my patron saint Ebeneezer Scrooge once said "let them die and decrease the surplus population."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Why, when I was a kid, I had every disease known to man, chugged formula tainted with melamine,
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 10:19 AM by beam me up scottie
smoked three packs of unfiltered Camels a day, drank heavily, was repeatedly run over by SUV's, choked on small toys, and not only did I survive it all, I loved every minute of it!

By gawd, if it was good enough for me, it's good enough for them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Exactly, hang 'em all , flog 'em all, send 'em all up the chimneys...
We've gotten far too soft on children in the last 200 years! No more of this sentimental rubbish! It's all very well to save the lives of fertilized eggs, but once they're born, they're old enough to stand on their own feet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Absolutely right.
n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. We need to weed out the weak ones anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. She's right, it is
In the process of arguing with right-wingers, I've actually worked this out several times and in several ways.

Year-to-year running costs (discounting set-up costs) using NHS model: Aprox. $600 billion.
Year-to-year running costs (discounting set-up costs) using French model: Aprox. $900 billion (French are generally accepted to have best health system in world).

Amount spent on private healthcare by Americans annually: Aprox. $2.3 trillion.
Medicare cost for year 2002/03: Aprox. $257 billion
Medicaid annual budget: Aprox. $295 billion
Admin costs of NHS: Aprox 6% of budget (including benefits and pensions).
Admin costs of private insurance: Varies but commonly 20-30% of budget.

Now, $600 billion seems like a lot but firstly, it's less that the USA's annual military budget (aprox. $610 billion, not counting either war or the undisclosed intelligence budget) and more importantly, it's still a lot less than the aprox. $2.85 trillion spent by Americans on the combination of Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance. Those three combined still leave millions uninsured.

So national healthcare, even allowing for start-up costs, would be cheaper and covers absolutely everyone. Yes, there are problems with the existing systems but since the US is coming to this late, there's nothing to stop you from setting up a commission to study the existing programs and mix-and-matching parts until you come up with something worthwhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. She's absolutely right.
Health care has been made into a mere commodity and that is completely and absolutely immoral.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Exactly.
Withholding care from people in need is bad enough, but when the "I've got mine" crowd ignore the problem, it's even worse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC