Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deadly Immunity from Rolling Stone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:59 PM
Original message
Deadly Immunity from Rolling Stone
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. investigates the government cover-up of a mercury/autism scandal

Even many conservatives are shocked by the government's effort to cover up the dangers of thimerosal. Rep. Dan Burton, a Republican from Indiana, oversaw a three-year investigation of thimerosal after his grandson was diagnosed with autism. "Thimerosal used as a preservative in vaccines is directly related to the autism epidemic," his House Government Reform Committee concluded in its final report. "This epidemic in all probability may have been prevented or curtailed had the FDA not been asleep at the switch regarding a lack of safety data regarding injected thimerosal, a known neurotoxin." The FDA and other public-health agencies failed to act, the committee added, out of "institutional malfeasance for self protection" and "misplaced protectionism of the pharmaceutical industry."
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/7395411/deadly_immunity/

Related video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKjCpkyAbSY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LibinMo Donating Member (364 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was hoping to see RFK Jr up for an Obama cabinet position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. "institutional malfeasance for self protection"
Edited on Thu Nov-20-08 02:26 PM by The Backlash Cometh
Yeah. That's reached epidemic proportions,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's too bad such an intelligent man allies himself with a lost cause
because no investigation has found any link at all between the minute and non bioavailable mercury based preservatives in vaccines and autism.

Research is showing, however, that autism is a congenital condition that presents itself during later infancy.

To all the mercury conspiricists I'd like to ask one question:

Since mercury preservatives have been removed from childhood vaccines for the past few years, why haven't the rates of autism gone down?

Kennedy needs to find a new windmill to tilt at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Mercury is in the flu vaccine and others in trace amounts.
Kennedy and others will be vindicated in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Only in the flu vaccine for children and it's not mandatory
and can be avoided by giving the nasal vaccine.

Pick another windmill. This one's fallen down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It's not mandatory, yet. You said mercury was removed from vaccines which is incorrect.
You also appear to assume that mercury in vaccines is the only vaccine avenue to autism?

However, before recommending the alternative to the mercury laden shot, note that Flumist is not recommended for children under two and/or those with various medical conditions:

Do not administer FluMist to children <24 months of age because of increased risk of hospitalization
and wheezing observed in clinical trials. (5.1)
• FluMist should not be administered to any individuals with asthma or children < 5 years of age with
recurrent wheezing because of the potential for increased risk of wheezing post vaccination. (5.2)
• If Guillain-Barré syndrome has occurred with any prior influenza vaccination, the decision to give
FluMist should be based on careful consideration of the potential benefits and risks. (5.3)
• Administration of FluMist, a live virus vaccine, to immunocompromised persons should be based
on careful consideration of potential benefits and risks. (5.4)
Safety has not been established in individuals with underlying medical conditions predisposing
them to wild-type influenza infection complications.
(5.5)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Actually he said mercury had been removed from all childhood vaccines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Regardless, it's false. Parents are being encouraged to vaccinate children for influenza.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. It's not a mandatory childhood vaccine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Who said
it was? It's being promoted, not mandated. There isn't generally enough to go around, let alone mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. You falsely stated that Warpy said that thimerosal had been removed from all vaccines.
I simply corrected you.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. No I didn't
Edited on Fri Nov-21-08 12:06 AM by mzmolly
I corrected the notion that mercury had been removed from "childhood" vaccines.

Here is the statement I responded to.

"Since mercury preservatives have been removed from childhood vaccines for the past few years, why haven't the rates of autism gone down?"

This statement is false. The Flu vaccine is recommended for children as young as six months, and it's now being recommended for pregnant women.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Post #8 "You said mercury was removed from vaccines which is incorrect."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Note the word "all" is missing, which is why context and comprehension
is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. Note he never said that, which makes your statement false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. Again I defer to the
context and contradictions in posts 3 and 6.

We were discussing mercury in the context of CHILDHOOD vaccines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. Thimerosal has been removed from all mandatory childhood vaccines, not hard to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. The word mandatory was not used, and the case was made that autism
rates should be greatly declining given "mercury has been removed from childhood vaccines."

However, it's also false to say that all mandatory childhood vaccines are mercury free. Some still contain trace amounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. So if the "high" levels of "mercury" were reduced to trace amounts, wouldn't the cases decline?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #53
56. Not if we're mass vaccinating pregnant women and small children with the flu vaccine. However,
Edited on Fri Nov-21-08 12:49 AM by mzmolly
trace amounts may be enough of a catalyst in a vulnerable individual. We also have the potential issue with the MMR vaccine.

I find it curious that the CDC would promote the "mercury has been removed from vaccines" b.s. while at the same time encouraging a vaccine that contains mercury for pregnant women and small children. So if autism does not decline (and mercury remains in vaccines) we'll know why there is little confidence in that talking point eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. So even though children are exposed to far less "mercury" than were previously..
we should expect to see a continuing rise in rates of autism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #58
59. Ridiculous response once again.
I never suggested we'd see a "rise" in autism I said we may or may not see a decline as we don't know the threshold in vulnerable individuals. The talking point about mercury removal is moot given it's false.

However speaking of rising rates of autism, the Minnesota born Somali population is experiencing an autism epidemic ...

http://wcco.com/specialreports/somali.community.autism.2.780309.html

Perhaps if we take an honest look, we'll find the answers?

Good night, I'm done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. Not as ridiculous as your willingness to overlook the obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. I've had more intelligent conversations
with my friends toddler.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #61
62. The toddler didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. Assuming you speak for
those who share your mentality, I'll take your word for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. It's ok we know you can't help it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #52
55. No answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. Sorry I was late in my response.
Life calls from time to time. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #52
66. When the video was recorded .
there were still stores of tainted drugs on the shelves of doctors and pharmacies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
90. So it's like homeopathic mercury?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
65. The supplies may be dwindling ..
there was never an actual RECALL, so some doses were used up from supplies on hand.

What's worse, these unsafe injections are being exported to third world countries. China has seen a sharp increase in autism.

See the youtube link for more info on America exporting autism and how far that will go with our worldly influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #65
87. China has seen a sharp DECREASE in children dying before the age of 5
In the early 1950s before all those evil vaccinations, about 20 percent of Chinese children died in infancy or early childhood. Now it's about a tenth of that (still too high). There are of course other factors besides vaccines involved in the change - but vaccines are generally regarded as one of the more significant ones.

But obviously it's better for a child to die of a preventable disease than to have an eeeeeevil vaccination, isn't it? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #65
88. Go look up what the shelf life of the various vaccines is
I double dog dare you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great interview on Imus.
Thanks for posting. I don't believe I've seen it previously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. This article was discredited THREE AND A HALF YEARS AGO.
When it was released. Next time, try to post something a little more recent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreamnightwind Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Discredited? Not that I've seen
The only discrediting I've seen is ludicrous. It goes something like this: We've removed thimerosol from the vaccines. Yet autism diagnosis continue to rise. Therefore the thimerosol wasn't the problem. Looks ok on its face, so many buy it, but look a little deeper.

People are still becoming conscious about what autism is, and how to identify it. So diagnosis will be rising because of this.

Also there are many other environmental exposures which have been increasing as thimerosol use has decreased.

Also people think thimerosol is not used anymore, well it's just not true. I have a kid and we were conned into vaccines containing it a few times. The health "professionals" were very convincing, not very honest, and gave us little or no reasonable alternatives. Seriously. We cared, and went against the grain with our nurses and doctors, and still ended up with some of the stuff going into our child. Makes me sick to think about it.

Not a complete debinking here, just a few points. If the thimerosol link has been legitimately disproven, post some info, I just want to know the truth. The "evidence" of no linkage I've seen so far has not been credible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well of course not, when you keep your eyes firmly shut.
Which every good anti-vaxer does when confronted with facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
68. At the date the video was recorded ..
thirmerosol is/was being exported to children in other countries! We are exporting autism. It's very sad and alarming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
76. Wow what lies.
Evidence huh..I guess you don't bother to get evidence from SCIENTIFIC institutions like..NIH...
http://www.niaid.nih.gov/factsheets/thimerosalqa.htm
WHO-
http://www.who.int/immunization_safety/ispp/ispp_final_report_thiomersal/en/
But what the hell do scientists know anyway, right?:sarcasm:

As for being "conned" into getting a flu vaccine with thimerosol (the only vaccine that has it) thats bullshit. You are GIVEN an information sheet about a vaccine before administered. If you can't or won't be bothered to READ THE FUCKING PAPER then don't start whining about dishonest doctors and nurses. Your post is dishonest in the extreme btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. This is all the antivax people have
and none of them has answered my question except to lie about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
67. Then kindly post the discredit
right here and now. I'm hardly going to go on your word when I have a public servant heavy weight telling me otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #67
70. LOL
You're new here, aren't you?

Tell you what - you have a star. You can do searches. Search this forum for RFK, "deadly immunity", etc. and find a past thread on it. It's been hashed and rehashed and now recycled once again because the anti-vaxers really have nothing else in the last 4 years they can cling to. This is it. So much like creationists, they simply bring out the same old demolished arguments acting like no one ever disproved them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #70
72. As it stands now
and to my knowledge it has not been disproved. Unless you intend to do that you're just wasting my time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #72
73. Too lazy to do a simple search, huh?
Well I suppose you're not motivated, since it would actually prove you wrong. Can't blame ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #73
82. I can only assume "trotsky" describes your carriage.
Palinesque?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #82
84. Since you have abandoned the topic, I'll consider this your surrender.
Done in by a request to do a DU search. Ah, I had such hopes for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Interesting to note that this piece was written before the US "vaccine court" ruled
Edited on Thu Nov-20-08 05:15 PM by mzmolly
that Hannah Poling is autistic due to vaccination. I know some will take issue with my verbiage but thems the breaks. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is the second time today this 3 year old article by RFKjr has been posted on DU
Edited on Thu Nov-20-08 09:37 PM by glitch
That seems odd to me, although of course I am always happy to see anything written by RFKjr get wider distribution.

Please satisfy my curiosity -- what prompted you to post this now?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. I got my flu vaccine a couple of weeks ago, I think I caught the autism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Why does this matter Jenny McCarthy has discovered a cure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. See I'm responding to my own posts, it must be autism or it could be the concussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. We are all praying that you find the help you need. Good luck!
Try chelation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Trying to decide whether or not go to the ER for the concussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. It's a tough decision, that is true. What if it's worse than a concussion?
If you go they'll tell you it's just a concussion and to go home and rest.
If you don't go God knows what could happen.

Better safe than sorry, err on the side of caution. Free advice from an anonymous internet poster, to you.
Of course if you don't have medical insurance skip it, just visiting ER will cost $1000s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. No worsening of the symptoms, I think I'll be okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
89. What a pity a promising scientist like J. McCarthy wasted her talents...
...to a be a celebutante.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I'm sure the parents of vaccine injured
children are amused. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I doubt it, but they weren't injured by the flu vaccine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. You are asserting that no one has been injured by a flu vaccine?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. No I'm asserting that no one developed autism from a single dose of the flu vaccine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. According to you autism is never a result of
vaccination, correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. A single dose of the flu vaccine has never resulted in autism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. According to you autism is never a result of
vaccination, correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. A single dose of the flu vaccine has never resulted in autism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. No one has ever received lung cancer
from cigarette smoking. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I don't think you can back that statement up scientifically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. That makes two of us.
However, you may wish to familiarize yourself with some of the bought and paid for science by big tobacco.

Here's one example:

http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/welcome/features/20071114_cardio-tobacco/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. Someone else believes the same crap you do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. You don't know what I believe. However RFK Jr. is among those who feel that
mercury is a known neurotoxin and as such it should be removed from ALL vaccines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. You said there were two of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. I see
your running out of relevant things to say, again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. Babies shouldn't be allowed to breastfeed then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. I'm not opposed to mothers milk being tested for mercury
so people can make an informed decision, you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. Yes mothers should be informed that breastfeeding will result in more mercury exposure than vaccines
Edited on Fri Nov-21-08 12:22 AM by Fire_Medic_Dave
Then they'll see how stupid the anti-vax argument is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. "May" result .... However the method of delivery
is different and thimerosal may have an even greater impact on the brain according to primate studies conducted in 2005. I think mercury is a valid concern either way.

I'm particularly concerned about giving flu shots to pregnant women because no one has really identified the threshold dose for which thimerosal can become problematic for tiny fetuses. Certainly, the amount of mercury in a single flu shot is very small and most likely harmless. "It's equivalent to the amount in a small can of tuna fish," says Tom Clarkson, a mercury researcher at the University of Rochester. "Still, we know that high levels of mercury can affect cell division in the developing brain of a fetus, and no one can say with absolute certainty that there's no risk."

The other concern is that the kind of mercury found in vaccines is different from the methyl mercury found in fish. While thimerosal gets flushed from the body much faster than methyl mercury, what remains is more likely to accumulate in the brain, as inorganic mercury, and remain there for a year or more, according to a 2005 University of Washington study of infant monkeys. "We still don't have enough data to say how long this inorganic mercury stays in the brain, but if you can reduce or eliminate your baby's exposure, why wouldn't you do that?"
says Tom Burbacher, a professor of environmental occupational health sciences who led the study.


http://www.usnews.com/blogs/on-women/2008/9/26/an-option-flu-vaccines-without-mercury-based-thimerosal.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #36
85. ...
you perfectly exemplify the idiocy of the anti-intelligent.

As I said previously my comment about lung cancer was :sarcasm:

Perhaps rephrasing in kind will suffice for the party who deleted my original reply? Unless of course it's more PC to call someone a lunatic vs. an idiot? Time will tell I guess. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
69. I'm sure RFK Jr. is a good lawyer
After all, he has prestigious law degrees.

But I prefer to trust medical decisions to doctors. And he doesn't have ANY training in the medical field.

History has proved him wrong on thimerosal. It is time to give up that worn out argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. Most of the "bleeding edge" anti-vaxers already have given up on thimerosal.
And they've gotten smarter - instead of targeting one specific ingredient, they speak of generic "toxins" and of "greening our vaccines." That way they've got their bets covered, and no amount of research can "prove" them wrong because ultimately even the killed virus in a vaccine is a "toxin". The leaders of the anti-vax movement don't ever want to kill their cash cow. They make tons of money as paid professional witnesses, selling books, giving talks, and their dupes swallow everything whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #71
74. Oh yeah. That's it.
Their earnings really rival those of the pharmaceutical companies/federal agencies/medical associations.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #74
75. Red herring.
Do people make money from the anti-vax movement? Yes or no. It doesn't have to be on the order of billions of dollars for money to be a conflict of interest, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #75
79. I know you are but what am I. nt eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. Ah, I see.
I hope you find peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #80
81. Good job trotsky!
You got someone who's argument with you consists of childhood taunts! Pretty funny!:rofl: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #81
83. When they don't have facts on their side, what else is left?
Color me not surprised. I've seen it far too many times in this forum, rather than address the facts, I'm attacked and labeled. I'm a paid shill for big pharma. I'm a doctor who is afraid to see my livelihood impacted by "real" medicine. If I kept track of every ad hom that's been thrown at me I would have filled up my hard drive by now. So a Kindergarten taunt is actually a nice change of pace. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #74
77. Actually the anti-vaxxers are supported by
the holistic medicine/natropathic movement which IS a billion dollar industry. So YES their earnings do rival pharmaceutical companies.
But hey what the fuck does that matter. You know what you know and TO HELL WITH FACTS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #77
86. The shills for Big Snake Oil will never give up!
The get their weekly checks from people like Kevin Trudeau to keep them posting this kind of mis-information.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dropkickpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
78. Oh Noes!!!!!
I'm immune to Rolling Stone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC