Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"My employer will stop my health insurance, and just pay the penalty because would be cheaper."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:50 AM
Original message
"My employer will stop my health insurance, and just pay the penalty because would be cheaper."
When people throw this argument at me, I calmly reply to them that if this were true then why doesn't their employer stop offering insurance right now?
Their employer could do that today and pay no penalty. Zero, zip, nada. That would be even cheaper than paying a penalty. But their employer doesn't do that, do they?

For decades, there has been nothing to legally require employers to offer health insurance, and most don't offer it out of the goodness of their hearts. They offer it because
other employers do, and that if they want to attract the best employees they need to offer competitive benefits.

If employers offer health insurance now, when there is no financial penalty for not offering it, what makes people think that once a penalty is
enacted that employers will stop offering it, en masse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, for one, Helath Insurance provided as a benifit is tax deductable to
the business...

I am sure that penalties would not be deductable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. So you imagine that the tax deductable status of health insurance...
is going to stop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. No way....
The penalties from not providing health care to employees would not be deductable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. My employer pays about 10-15000 per year for me - I guess because otherwise we would leave
and find another job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. They already are
drip by drip. First the employees lost retiree care, then family care (employee only), higher copays and higher deductables. It is already worthless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yes, but Rush, Sean, and Glenn have all told us that the alternative is socialism, whatever that is.
I just know it's bad, because if they say it's bad then it must be.

Thank God I'll be eligible for good old all-American Medicare some day, instead of that socialism health insurance that Obama wants to give us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. They might end up with a better plan. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sftwrngnr Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. As I understand it...
The purpose of the penalty is two fold: 1.) To encourage employers to provide health insurance options for their employees, and 2.) in the event that the employer chooses not to provide health insurance for their employees, the penalty kicks in, and the penalty helps to subsidize the public option which the employees would be eligible for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Although there would be no requirement for them to use the public option.
They could buy insurance from a private insurer if they wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC