Is there ANYTHING corporations won't do for a buck?
DrWeil.com
Question:
I’ve heard that most of the olive oil sold in the United States isn’t really olive oil but something else passed off as “extra-virgin” or whatever. Is this true?
Answer:
Unfortunately, it appears to be true. I've been doing some research lately on the untold olive oil story, which is a scandal in need of widespread exposure and corrective measures. I'll be reporting on what I've learned this week in response to questions that I've been asked on the subject.
..snip..
Most of the olive oil sold in the United States is imported from Italy or Spain. While some Italian and Spanish olive oils are of very high quality, many products sold in the United States as "extra-virgin" may be a lesser grade of olive oil and some may be primarily canola or hazelnut oil to which a small amount of olive oil has been added for color and taste. Some olive oil we get here may come from pomace, the olive pulp left after pressing out the oil. Additional oil can be extracted from pomace by treating it with hexane, a chemical solvent - not a good practice. Even when the bottle contains genuine olive oil, it may not be from Italy or Spain as the labels suggest - both countries import huge quantities of cheaper olive oils from Tunisia, Turkey, Morocco or Libya, bottle them and label them "imported from" Italy or Spain. This is deceptive marketing.
Tomorrow, I'll discuss the loopholes in U.S. laws that allow the sale of substandard olive oils here.
Andrew Weil, M.D.
http://www.drweil.com/u/QA/QA365370/________________________
Question:
Why does the United States allow the import and sale of olive oil products that aren’t really olive oil or aren’t really extra-virgin, even if they say so?
Answer:
A lot of the olive oil imported into the United States may not be olive oil at all, and much of it isn't the high quality "extra-virgin" olive oil as labels claim. The problem has to do with antiquated labeling requirements in this country, which date back to 1948 and use terminology not recognized elsewhere in the world, such as "fancy", "choice" or "standard". Furthermore, the U.S. hasn't established standards for olive oil quality comparable to those existing in Europe. There, extra-virgin olive oil must measure up to strict criteria in order to gain certification from the International Olive Oil Council (IOOC) or certifying bodies in individual countries, particularly Italy, Spain, Greece and France, where much of the olive oil in the European market is produced.
In addition, very little of the olive oil imported into the United States is tested here to see if it truly is olive oil or really is "extra-virgin". The North American Olive Oil Association (NAOOA), which represents olive oil importers, periodically tests imports at random but not in volume. The NAOOA concedes that some substandard olive oil is imported into the U.S. and labeled as extra-virgin but maintains the practice isn't as widespread as has been alleged. I do not agree.
The U.S. could bring olive oil sold in this country into line with European standards simply by joining the IOOC or by adopting its standards. As things now stand, only the California Olive Oil Council (COOC) certifies olive oils in this country. It's a great group, worthy of support, but it deals only with olive oils produced in California. The COOC is a member of the IOOC and adheres to the European standards in certifying California-produced oils. Both the COOC and the NAOOA want the U.S. to modernize its regulations governing imported olive oil. The COOC has petitioned the Department of Agriculture to establish standards in line with those prevailing in Europe and to change labeling requirements so that the term "extra-virgin" can be used only for olive oils that would make the grade in Europe.
The downside to adopting the European standards could be higher prices, particularly for extra-virgin olive oil, but at least U.S. consumers would actually get what we're paying for. Consumers choose olive oil thinking they are getting a healthier product than ordinary vegetable oil. If it isn't, they need to know about it. To make your voice heard in this matter, write your U.S. senators or representatives in Congress. If you don't know who they are, you can find out and get their email addresses by visiting www.congress.org.
In the meantime, here's a tip: To find out if your olive oil is the real thing, put it in the refrigerator. If it clouds up, it really is olive oil. It will clear up when it returns to room temperature.
Tomorrow, I'll discuss how to find and choose high quality olive oil.
Andrew Weil, M.D.
Moderator Dr. Weil Team
Weil Lifestyle, LLC
http://forums.drweil.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=drwQA&msg=1743.1&ctx=0_____________________________
There is a bill, H.R.4167 that just passed the House (in March06) and is now waiting for the Senate committee to decide whether to offer an analagous bill. It is called,
The National Uniformity for Foods Act of 2005.You can read about this orwellian named act at
http://www.afdo.org/afdo/HR4167.cfm . and here is the problem: this is about forcing the states to only put on the labels what the FDA approves and it will probably invalidate all the food safety labelling that the states have passed unless the FDA first approves them. I think we probably all understand that means many
labels about mercury and other things will take forever to be approved. Please write your senators and congressman and letters to the editor and the committee members. There are several websites out there talking about this: google it for more info. This is a bill that has been rejected several times but managed to pass under the radar this time. There is even a website out there (a little edgy...) that claims it is about glutamate, but you can judge:
http://www.truthinlabeling.org /.
The important thing is that it gives food and chemical associations and lobbying unpresidented access to what goes on our food labels and that cannot be a good thing.
To see if your congressional rep co-sponsored HR 4167 see:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR04167:@@...
Major actions on this bill can be viewed at:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR04167:@@...
The final roll call was 283 to 139 (passed). See how the vote went down at
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll032.xml