Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Evidence to Support Psychological Debriefing in Schools Decreases PTSD After Disasters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
steven johnson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 11:53 PM
Original message
No Evidence to Support Psychological Debriefing in Schools Decreases PTSD After Disasters
Psychological interventions intended to prevent the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the early stages after a traumatic experience have not been shown to be effective, Cochrane Researchers have concluded. The evidence now tends to suggest therapy is most effective if aimed at only those individuals showing symptoms of PTSD.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090707201130.htm



ScienceDaily (Jan. 7, 2010) — There is no evidence to support psychological debriefing in schools after traumatic events such as violence, suicides and accidental death, which runs counter to current practice in some Canadian school jurisdictions, according to a commentary in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal).

Recent systematic reviews indicate that psychological debriefing of adults does not prevent post-traumatic stress disorder and it may even increase the risk of this disorder. While there is little research on the effectiveness and safety of these interventions in schools, "the evidence clearly points to the ineffectiveness of these interventions in preventing post-traumatic stress disorder or any other psychiatric disorder in adults," write Magdalena Szumilas of the Sun Life Financial Chair in Adolescent Mental Health Team, Dalhousie University and coauthors.

Two programs, based on the empirically-supported principles of engendering feelings of safety, calmness, sense of self and community efficacy, connectedness and hope, show promise of effectiveness. Providing Psychological First Aid immediately after an incident and providing cognitive behavioural support for students with persistent distress weeks after a school trauma has ended may be helpful.

They urge that psychological debriefing not be performed after traumatic incidents in schools, and that more research is needed to assess psychological and mental health interventions prior to implementation in schools.


No Evidence to Support Psychological Debriefing in Schools, Experts Argue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. just give them each 20000000000 iu of vit D and they'll be fine.
:sarcasm:

"Providing Psychological First Aid immediately after an incident and providing cognitive behavioural support for students with persistent distress weeks after a school trauma has ended may be helpful."

It probably depends on what is done, by whom, how and when.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sarcasm aside.. there is significant study on use of beta blockers
(e.g., propranalol) after major trauma or even years later for PTSD sufferers. By reducing the adrenaline response to the trauma (or remembered trauma), it seems to reduce the chance of permenently "linked" reactions that is the hallmark of PTSD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Which makes a lot of sense. Are they using b blockers post trauma or just studying them?
I first ran across them when I had to go to court for a custody issue, doc told me that they were used by people on stage to prevent the adrenaline issues, and that they wouldn't impact how I felt, just my body's reaction to stress.

Rather like the sense of smell being deeply associated with things, makes sense that the adrenaline fight/flight body's reaction would become emotionally associated.

Thank you for the info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. There are some recent studies, but I'm told by a psychiatrist friend
that some of his colleagues have been using for many years. I'm not sure how wide spread its use is with military PTSD, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. On the other hand, even if there isn't a PTSD risk for someone it rarely hurts to talk about things
Your typical high schooler isn't going to develop PTSD because a student died in a car wreck (or even a homicide or the like), but even so it'd take some work to convince me that talking things out afterwards wouldn't generally be a Good Thing regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The concern is that pushing people to talk about an upsetting experience
Edited on Sun Jan-10-10 03:56 AM by woo me with science
cam actually exercise and strengthen the negative feelings and neural pathways underlying the PTSD response. This is the principle that has made trauma therapy so destructive to some people in the past; it is based on the false assumption that trauma is like a toxin that must be "processed" and "let out" in order for the person to feel better. In fact, current research suggests that the more you push people to focus on the upsetting thoughts and feelings, the more likely those brain pathways are to be activated and strengthened. People pushed to focus on upsetting and traumatic experiences after they experience them are actually MORE likely to show PTSD symptoms a year later than those who are spared such crisis intervention.

Of course, nobody should be prevented from talking about an upsetting experience if they want to. However, we have often told reluctant trauma victims that they SHOULD talk about things in order to feel better when actually that may be the worst possible advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I guess our bodies know best
While people often find it really helpful to talk about a trauma repeatedly, sometimes blocking things out at first is an adaptive response. People should just handle such events in a way that seems natural to them.

I don't think they should stop counseling kids after a disaster. They should just change their technique so they simply support what the kids feel inclined to do to react and cope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC