Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Women taking 1,000 mg of vitamin C daily are 25% more likely to develop cataracts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:37 AM
Original message
Women taking 1,000 mg of vitamin C daily are 25% more likely to develop cataracts
snip

Researchers followed 25,593 women, aged 49 to 83, for eight years and found that those who took 1,000 mg of vitamin C daily were 25 per cent more likely to develop cataracts than those who did not use supplements.

Among women 65 and older, vitamin C use increased the risk of cataract by 38 per cent. Taking vitamin C in combination with hormone replacement therapy or corticosteroid medication was associated with an even greater risk.

However, getting too little vitamin C may also contribute to cataracts, since vitamin C is a potent antioxidant, protecting from free radicals. Previous research has linked higher blood levels and dietary intakes of vitamin C with a lower risk of cataracts.

The new study showed that multivitamins containing a small amount of vitamin C (60 mg) did not increase cataract risk.



Read more at

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health/high-dose-vitamin-c-can-increase-cataract-risk/article1445734/





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now that's interesting. But don't tell Linus Pauling. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. If this is true so much for the notion that certain vitamins like C aren't
dangerous at high levels because they are water soluble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Dosage is everything with any drug.
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 10:10 AM by bemildred
Too little, you don't get the right effect, too much and it's toxic or you get extra unwanted effects. Even with the right dosage it is common to get extra unwanted effects. And most any isolated chemical nutrient can be viewed as a drug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. And that's why supplements need to be regulated
so a consumer can be confident they are getting the dose they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. As long as they don't start forbidding things, that would be good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Taking any supplement in such a high dosage for eight years
probably causes nutritional imbalances.
Anything in excess is not good for the body, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. well it did not cause cataracts on me.
Edited on Wed Jan-27-10 10:00 AM by newfie11
Maybe I am the only one but I have taken 10 grams of Vit C for 20 years with no problems. I am 63, just saw my eye doctor for yearly exam and to refill my contacts. I always ask about cataracts as I have worked 40 years as an x-ray tech. 15 of those years as a specials tech standing over a c-arm with radiation coming up towards my face. Yes I had a lead apron and thyroid sheild but nothing for eyes.

So blast away. All I can say is it has not happened to me. Also I haven't been sick for many many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Are you sure you don't have cataracts cause you seem to have missed
that this was seen in 25% of women who took that amount. Obviously you would be included among those 75% catagory who did not get cataracts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. MEOWWW!!!!!
Just stating the facts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. This is one of the rudest forums in DU
and that is saying a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. It really is
And this thread is like a group hug compared to many others here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. Anecdote vs data...nt
Edited on Tue Mar-02-10 09:51 AM by SidDithers
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. This makes me laugh
can't people share their personal experience here? (Of course, it's not proof, though!) But why can't people share anecdotal information in regard to topics?

So what?

I take Vitamin C every day, too! So far, no cataracts. I will be sure to check for them, however, at my eye examinations.

Not proof of anything, but sharing my experience.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Of course people can share anecdotes here
However, all too often (as in this case) the single-case anecdote is put forth as if it were a refutation to a formal study, and some readers are happy to latch onto the anecdote while disregarding the rest.

That's how the denial of global warming works, by the way: "We just had a big snow storm, so global warming must be bullshit."


People are welcome to share anecdotes as anecdotes, but they shouldn't be taken as a substitute for real evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. There are a lot of potential confounding exposures that could
provide these findings... Without having the actual study available, it is hard to assess. If the women with cataracts were more likely to have these other risk factors, e.g, obesity, high blood pressure, sun exposure, other dietary issues, etc., etc. this could be erroneous. Nonetheless, I think there is a general truth that natural sources of vitamins/minerals are in most cases superior. Living at altitude in Colorado, the likelihood of NOT developing cataracts is actually pretty low--even if you are meticulous about wearing sunglasses and all the other factors... So the role of excess vitamin C is likely to be very minimal compared to other factors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. 25% of what?
You always have to ask that. I hate these freaking "x% more likely" studies. They're like a cottage industry for getting published in newspapers. Causation, as opposed to correlation, is rarely proved.

I remember a study from some years back that found smokers were such-and-such percent more likely not to wear their seat belts. That doesn't mean smoking causes a person not to wear seat belts, fer chris'sake.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It' s there in B&W. 25% of the 25,593 women, aged 49 to 83,
researchers followed for 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-27-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It absolutely is not
"Researchers followed 25,593 women, aged 49 to 83, for eight years and found that those who took 1,000 mg of vitamin C daily were 25 per cent more likely to develop cataracts than those who did not use supplements."

Not 25% of them; 25% more likely. We need to know what the likelihood is of developing cataracts is in general to see how statistically significant the findings are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. What about the guineau pigs?? Don't forget about the guineau pigs...
Preventive effect of ascorbic acid against glucocorticoid-induced cataract formation of developing chick embryos
Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Hideo Nishigori Corresponding Author Contact Information, Rume Hayashi , Jung W. Lee , Kazuo Maruyama and Motoharu Iwatsuru

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Teikyo University, Sagamiko, Kanagawa, Japan
Received 19 June 1984;
accepted 27 September 1984.
Available online 11 April 2004.

Abstract

Glucocorticoid administration to developing chick embryos is known to promote cataract formation with a decreasing level of glutathione in the lens. To gain further understanding of this process, the level of ascorbic acid, a biological antioxidant, in the lenses was measured during the course of glucocorticoid treatment. When 0·25 μmol of hydrocortisone hemisuccinate sodium (HC) were administered to 15-day-old chick embryos, the level of ascorbic acid in the lens began to decline after 30 hr and became around 40% of the control value at 48 hr after HC treatment. At this time about 90% of the lenses showed opacity in the nuclear region. However, the level of ascorbic acid in the cataractous lens recovered to the control level at 96 hr, a time when the lens has recovered from cataract formation.

A triple application of ascorbic acid (20 μmol/egg) at 3, 10 and 20 hr after HC treatment significantly prevented lens opacification. The administration of ascorbic acid prevented the decline of ascorbic acid content and partially that of glutathione content in the lens caused by HC.

Author Keywords: Author Keywords: glucocorticoid; hydrocortisone; cataract; chick embryo; ascorbic acid; lens; glutathione
Article Outline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. 77,000 nurses agree... lutein prevents cataracts.
http://www.luteininfo.com/eyelutein

Chasan-Taber and co-workers conducted a prospective study of 77,466 female nurses 45-71 years old, from 1980 through 1992. The results showed that nurses with the highest intake of lutein and zeaxanthin had 22 percent lower risk of cataract extraction compared to those in the lowest quintile of intake. This study also showed that high intake of spinach and kale, green vegetables rich in lutein, may reduce the risk of cataract extraction.** 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
finn78 Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
16. It's the old too many vitamins debate
This kind of issue has been around for years. Some studies show that taking too many vitamins can cause problems whilst others say that the body will simply urinate out anything it doesn't need. However, the fact that experts can decide on the answer is in itself enough reason not to go crazy with high doses of vitamins. I always stick to a low dosage multi-vitamin and try to eat healthily.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. That's the way to go
Eat healthy, take a multi for insurance.

Welcome to DU, by the way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC