Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mystery Hill, New Hampshire ................America's Stonehenge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 04:16 AM
Original message
Mystery Hill, New Hampshire ................America's Stonehenge
One of the most spectacular lithic sites in New England sits on a hilltop in southern New Hampshire, known for many years as Mystery Hill, and now called America's Stonehenge. The complex consists of stone chambers, dry-stone walls, underground passageways, standing stones, alignments and inscriptions.
The questionable history of Mystery Hill, subsequent ramsacking of rock from the site for Colonial-era and later building and often poorly managed excavations have left much disagreement in the scientific community as to the site's real antiquity. From more recent and better facilitated digs it would seem that this was not a Colonial-era farm, as has been put forth, although the fanciful names given to some of the structures, i.e. The Oracle Chamber, detract from serious archeological consideration. Now a privately owned tourist site, Mystery Hill continues to be studied today.

In 1826, the wooded rise was owned by a farmer named Jonathan Pattee, who built his house amidst the stone ruins as they stood then. The home burned some thirty years later, and the family moved elsewhere, leaving the site to the weather for decades. Locally the area of stone structures and walls became known as Pattee's Caves, and many people believed that farmer Pattee himself spent his time building all these wondrous chambers, for purposes unknown. This is a debatable point, although evidence for Mr. Pattee's utilization of the stones extant on the site is undeniable. Local history also makes vague reference to Pattee as a moonshiner, and that General Lafayette paid him a visit on his last tour of America. In any case, many stones were removed in later years and can be found in still-existing buildings and structures in the nearby towns of Lawrence and Andover, Massachusetts....cont'd

http://lithic.50g.com/newhamp.htm

__________________________________________________________________

The Mysterious Megaliths of New England

By Paul Tudor Angel

Mystery Hill, the Upton Cave, Calendar I and Calendar II, Gungywamp and Druid’s Hill are just several of the names given some incredibly important historical sites of which many have never heard a whisper. But their existence—and their importance—is becoming harder and harder to hide as more are discovered and interested folk become exposed to their grandeur.
Sometime in the late 1600s or early 1700s, early American colonists began discovering and utilizing underground "root cellars" made of large, but manageable pieces of dressed stone as storage houses for food stuffs. Colonists were also finding numerous stone buildings, usually of "one story, circular or rectangular in form, and up to 30 feet in length and up to 10 feet wide and eight feet high or more." Many included roof slabs or lintels of several tons. Many also had carefully crafted openings in their roofs which allowed a small amount of light to pass through to the interiors.The colonial newcomers were convinced that these so-called root cellars had been constructed by the former Amerind inhabitants of the area—irregardless of the fact that their Indian neighbors showed little hint of an ability to work in large stone or the desire to do so. Before long, the inheritors of these properties thought their own American ancestors had built these cellars—some which were eighty feet deep and lined the entire way with roughly hewn stone.

Simultaneously, hundreds, perhaps thousands, of oddly-inscribed flagstones were being found in the surrounding New England woods, carted off by farmers for use in stone walls or in larger stone structures in the settlements of the growing northeast. The angular cuts on these stones looked much like the marks a plow makes when it strikes a submerged piece of stone—at least they looked that way to most of the simple country farmers of the day. Others believed the markings appearing in rocks all across New England were "the action of the roots of trees." For decades nothing at all was thought of them. As any New Englander can tell you, the entire northeast is strewn with large chunks of striated stone material left from the last era of glacial recession.

But a local Puritan clergyman, Cotton Mather, was not convinced. In 1712 he discovered some strange incisions on an exposed seaside rockface in Dighton, Massachusetts—far from where any plow could have marked it. Winter ice and constant submergence at high tide under the Taunton River began obliterating some of the older markings and Mather was concerned the inscriptions would be lost for posterity...cont'd

http://www.100megsfree4.com/farshores/usmega.htm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wasn't it carbon-dated to 2000 BC?
I've seen it. It looks consistent with similar stone work in Europe at the approximate time.

It's not confusing. It's not really a mystery. It's an Old World colony on the east coast of the Americas that was obviously here for a serious amount of time.

There are a couple of books, probably more than a couple, on the written language they found. Ogham?

I knew it was true the second I remembered the word "papoose." You can figure out its meaning with an indoeuropean word root glossary. An unweaned child. Pap = nipple.

It's hard to believe, but people traveled further and more often than we ever dreamed before Hilton and Motel 6.

And if you really want to see a language with some indoeuropean explaining to do, take a glance at Nahuatl. What were the Aztecs doing with all that Greek?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. The prehistoric origin is disproven

They found some late 18th century brass nails under one of the big stones when they moved it for some reason a few years ago. The structures turn out to resemble one from the same period in Ireland, and iirc they traced the ownership of the land back to two Irish brothers and the time period in which they probably cleared the land and built stuff there to just two or three years, 1768 and 1769.

It's too bad. But the locals keep up the "mystery" in order to keep tourists coming. And it is fun to look at and speculate about. I suspect it's been slightly improved to be a bit more mysterious than the way it was when the present owner bought the land, but who can blame him....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Willy Lee Donating Member (925 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Have you ever heard of Cahokia Mounds?
It is in Illinois, near St. Louis. Hundreds of earthen mounds, some very large, used for burial and worship. It is claimed the site is where the most sophisticated prehistoric Indian civilization north of Mexico lived from AD 700-1400. They have a "Woodhenge" that aligns with the equinox/solstice skies. A very amazing and little known about place.

http://www.state.il.us/hpa/hs/Mounds.htm

I drive past Monks Mound, the largest in the group, on my way home from work every day. On the other side of the highway is a huge landfill mound... our legacy to future generations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC