Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China to complete artificial sun

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:06 AM
Original message
China to complete artificial sun


  BEIJING, Jan. 23 --  It was learned from the Hefei Institutes of Physical Science of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) that it will have completed the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) which aims to explore infinite and clean energy resources of nuclear fusion by this March or April.

By then, Hefei will become the first institute in the world to have built an all-superconducting non-circular section nuclear fusion experiment facility, which is generally known as an artificial sun.

The energy resource crisis has begun to threaten the world, as oil, coal and other types of non-renewable energy resources will be used up in a century. Scientists recommend the extraction of deuterium from sea water and the ignition of nuclear fusion of this element in temperatures as high as 100 million degrees Celsius. In nuclear fusion, deuterium abstracted from one kilogram of sea water will be able to produce as much energy as that of 300 liters of gasoline.

Invention of a facility that can withstand the temperature of 100 million degrees Celsius and control deuterium and atomic fusion to ensure steady and continuous energy output is equal to invention of an artificial sun, which can provide infinite and clean energy like the sun, as sea water is virtually inexhaustible.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-01/23/content_4088792.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wish them well.If they manage the fusion, they will make a major change
in global warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. If this works, expect to see China making territorial claims on the Moon.
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 11:56 AM by benburch
Because that is believed to be the most nearby place to find significant quantities of the Helium-3 that is almost certainly required to make a successful power reactor go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Funnily enough, the UN Security Council has a special classified
file on ALL territorial claims to the moon and has established a protocol for dealing with any moon claims since 1967. This includes the rights to prospecting, land allocations, commercial travel-related activities as well as military and quasi-military claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The difference being...
None of the people in that file could go to the moon to physically take it. China soon will be able to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. I have read the lunar helium-3 theory is not taken seriously by physicists
or at least some physicists. But I gather the fusion research community is getting confident that ITER will successfully demonstrate ignition. ITER would model a power plant that would generate its own tritium, needed for fusion. ITER is supposed to lead to DEMO in about 50 years, the first demonstration power plant. Either that or solar photovoltaics will drop in price (and increase in efficiency) to be competitive, by then. Either way, we will get our power from fusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. They educated their child-citizens to the furthest degree that they
'determined' the child could go. Their country has many scientists w/ a very high level of training. They WILL succeed where we fail.

We force those of the non-wealthy class to go through scholarship/loan/job/work-study hurdles. China does not.


They make sure the brightest stay on track.


(You might know what I want to post here - but it sounds so defeatist)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. HA HA HA AMERICA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. But.... it's NOT funny
Really, it's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Wow n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. Well, That's Fascinating
Obviously by a xenophobic American. (No Chinese person would ever write that way.)

It actually does look like Bush is benefitting the Chinese proliteriat more than Mao ever did. Ironic. It remains to be seen whether the US economy will collapse. The same predictions were being made about Japan twenty years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. More like forty years ago, but that talk was around.

Japan Population: 130 Million
China Population: 1.3 Billion

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Wasn't Clear
In the mid- to late-80s, when the Japanese economy was at its zenith, there were widespread predictions that Japan would eclipse the US as the world's major economy. Then Japan went into a long stagnation that it's really never come out of.

So I don't think China's economic victory is inevitable by a long shot. For one thing, they have to consume more domestically to keep growing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. "Mid- to late-80s" Now I recall.

I was referring to the late '60's as electronic products started to show up en-mass.

But you're right about the '80's. They were buying up piles of real estate in the US, too, and I think (ain't sure) that they had to divest quite a bit of it since.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. Meanwhile the U.S. continues to debate whether Intelligence Design
should be taught in Science classes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. this is what happens when scientific debate is allowed
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 07:55 AM by FLDem5
to extend beyond "Creationism: is it Real, or are you a Godless heretic". and "Stem Cell Research: A Cry in the Petri Dish".

This, coupled with the recent "brain drain" article makes me feel like I am living in Rome just before the decline.

http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_3425265

(edited to add link to article)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. How exciting for them. Wish it were US. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. Ahh, the venerable Tokamak
I think that Freeman Dyson had a much better design.

The Tokamak is a disposal headache and has a too short service life to investment ratio. But I wish them well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Why do you say this?
> The Tokamak is a disposal headache and has a too short service life to investment ratio.

Why do you say this? Have you looked at ITER's design with
its Lithium blanket?

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
13. source
Do we have a source for this other than the Chinese state news service?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Three words...

DON'T SCREW UP!!!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. I take these statements with a grain of salt
I've heard a few reports out of russia of big discoveries involving fusion energy that seem to just dissappear...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. One day, we will finish ITER. We have a wide range of fusion experiments
underway. I hope the Chinese can discover something new, but I really doubt they are going to leapfrog.
http://www.iter.org/index.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. We need fusion energy ASAP.
It would make nuclear and fossil fuel power plants obsolete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Don't be so sure.
It remains to be seen if fusion can be reliable!

Any high energy physics device is subject to sudden and complete failure! Often due to seemingly trivial defects.

Trust me on this; I've helped keep them running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. remember, nuclear power was supposed to make fossil fuels obselete
as well. that didn't take so well. Until we succcessfully pull off long term, sustainable and financially reasonable fusion, I won't hold my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I have to say this often, but any fusion technology will depend on fission
technology.

It's the matter of tritium.

The probability of fusion making fission power obsolete is close to nil, at least in this millenium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. ...some time before the real one burns out.
Story parses to: not yet, nor anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-10-06 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
28. Sustained fusion is a ways off...
...and this article by Xinhua is such posturing nonsense. Any plasma physicist would cringe.

The Chinese are nowhere near to a fusion reactor. The first magnetic confinment reactor will come out the work done by ITER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC